Anatomy and morphology in developing vegetative buds on detached Norway spruce branches in controlled conditions before bud burst

Tree Physiology

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1457-1465

  Sutinen, Sirkka ^a   Partanen, Jouni ^a   Viher Aarnio, Anneli ^a   Hkkinen, Risto ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bud development; Forcing; Microscopy; Picea abies; Temperature

Indexed keywords

AIR TEMPERATURE; BUD; CONIFEROUS TREE; MICROSCOPY; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CYTOLOGY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; LIPID METABOLISM; PLANT STEM; SEASON; SPRUCE; TEMPERATURE;

LIPID METABOLISM; PICEA; PLANT STEMS; SEASONS; TEMPERATURE;

PICEA ABIES;

EID: 74549127218     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: 17584469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpp078     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ahas, R., A. Aasa, A. Menzel, V.G. Fedotova and H. Scheifinger. 2002. Changes in European spring phenology. Int. J. Climatol. 22:1727-1738.
2. Beuker, E. 1994. Adaptation to climatic changes of the timing of bud burst in populations of Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies (L.) Karst. Tree Physiol. 14:961-970.
3. Bílková, J., J. Albrechtováand J. Opatrná. 1999. Histochemical detection and image analysis of nonspecific esterase activity and the amount of polyphenols during annual bud development in Norway spruce. J. Exp. Bot. 35:1129-1138.
4. Bolin, B., B.R. Döös, J. Jäger and R.A. Warrick. 1986. The greenhouse effect, climatic change and ecosystems. SCOPE 29. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 541 p.
5. Cajander, A.K. 1949. Forest types and their significance. Acta For. Fenn. 56:1-71.
6. Campbell, R.K and A.I. Sugano. 1975. Phenology of bud burst in Douglas-fir related to provenance, photoperiod, chilling, and flushing temperature. Bot. Gaz. 136:290-298.
7. Cannell, M.G.R. and R.I. Smith. 1983. Thermal time, chill days and prediction of budburst in Picea sitchensis. J. Appl. Ecol. 23:177-191.
8. Carter, T., M. Posch and H. Tuomenvirta. 1995. SILMUSCEN and CLIGEN users guide; guidelines for the construction of climatic scenarios and use of a stochastic weather generator in the Finnish Research Programme of Climate Change (SILMU). Publications of the Academy of Finland, 5/95, 62 p.
9. Doorenbos, J. 1953. Review of the literature on dormancy In buds of woody plants. Meded. van de Landbouwhogesch. Wageningen, Nederland 53:1-23.
10. de Faÿ , E., V. Vacher and F. Humbert. 2000. Water-related phenomena in winter buds and twigs of Picea abies L. (Karst.) until bud-burst: a biological, histological and NMR study. Ann. Bot. 86:1097-1107.
11. Fuchigami, L.H., C.J. Weiser, K. Kobayashi, R. Timmis and L.W. Gusta. 1982. A degree growth stage (°GS) model and cold acclimation in temperate woody plants. In Plant Cold Hardiness and Freezing Stress. Mechanisms and Crop Implications. Vol.2. Eds. P.H. Li and A. Sakai. Academic Press, New York, pp 93-116.
12. Guzicka, M. and A. Woźny. 2003. Mid-winter ultrastructural changes in the vegetative embryonic shoot of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.]. Ann. For. Sci. 60:461-466.
13. Gyllenstrand, N., D. Clapham, T. Källman and U. Lagercrantz. 2007. A Norway spruce flowering locus T homolog is implicated in control of growth rhythm in conifers. Plant Physiol. 144:248-257.
14. Häkkinen, R., T. Linkosalo and P. Hari. 1998. Effects of dormancy and environmental factors on timing of bud burst in Betula pendula. Tree Physiol. 18:707-712.
15. Hannerz, M. 1999. Evaluation of temperature models for predicting bud burst in Norway spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 29:9-19.
16. Hänninen, H. 1990. Modelling bud dormancy release in trees from cool and temperate regions. Acta For. Fenn. 213: 1-47.
17. Hänninen H. 1991. Does climatic warming increase the risk of frost damage in northern trees? Plant Cell Environ. 14: 449-454.
18. Hänninen, H. 1995. Effects of climatic change on trees from cool and temperate regions: an ecophysiological approach to modelling of bud burst phenology. Can. J. Bot. 73:183-199.
19. Heide, O.M. 1985. Physiological aspects of climatic adaptation in plants with special reference to high-latitude environments. In Plant Production in the North. Eds. Å. Kaurin, O. Junttila and J. Nilsen. Norwegian University Press, Tromsø, pp 1-22.
20. Heide, O.M. 1993a. Daylength and thermal time responses of budburst during dormancy release in some northern deciduous trees. Physiol. Plant. 88:531-540.
21. Heide, O.M. 1993b. Dormancy release in beech buds (Fagus sylvatica) requires both chilling and long days. Physiol. Plant. 89:187-191.
22. Heide, O.M. 2003. High autumn temperature delays spring bud burst in boreal trees, counterbalancing the effect of climatic warming. Tree Physiol. 23:931-936.
23. Hejnowicz, A. and E. Obarska. 1995. Structure and development of vegetative buds, from the lower crown of Picea abies. Ann. Sci. For. 52:433-447.
24. Jarvis, P.G. and S. Linder. 2000. Constraints to growth of boreal forests. Nature 405:904-905.
25. Jordy, M. 2004. Seasonal variation of organogenetic activity and reserves allocation in the shoot apex of Pinus pinaster Ait. Ann. Bot. 93:25-37.
26. Kalberer, S.R., M. Wisniewski and R. Arora. 2006. Deacclimation and reacclimation of cold-hardy plants: current understanding and emerging concepts. Plant Sci. 171:3-16.
27. Kellomäki, S., H. Hänninen and M. Kolström. 1995. Computations on frost damage to Scots pine under climatic warming in boreal conditions. Ecol. Appl. 5:42-52.
28. Kivimäenpää, M., A.M. Jönsson, I. Stjernquist, G. Selldén and S. Sutinen. 2004. The use of light and electron microscopy to assess the impact of ozone on Norway spruce needles. Environ. Pollut. 127:441-453.
29. Kobayashi, K.D. and L.H. Fuchigami. 1983. Modelling temperature effects in breaking rest in red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea L.). Ann. Bot. 52:205-215.
30. Kupila-Ahvenniemi, S., A. Lindfors and H. Häggman. 1987. Seasonal variations in the properties of ribosome assemblies from vegetative buds of Scots pine. Physiol. Plant. 71:55-60.
31. Lang, G.A., J.D. Early, G.C. Martin and R.L. Darnell. 1987. Endo- para- and ecodormancy: physiological terminology and classification for dormancy research. Hortic. Sci. 22:371-377.
32. Linkosalo, T., T.R. Carter, R. Häkkinen and P. Hari. 2000. Predicting spring phenology and frost damage risk of Betula sp. under climatic warming: a comparison of two models. Tree Physiol. 20:1175-1182.
33. Lipavská, H., H. Svobodováand J. Albrechtová. 2000. Annual dynamics of the content of non-structural saccharides in the context of structural development of vegetative buds of Norway spruce. J. Plant Physiol. 157:365-373. (Pubitemid 30805774)
34. Partanen, J., V. Koski and H. Hänninen. 1998. Effects of photoperiod and temperature on the timing of bud burst In Norway spruce (Picea abies). Tree Physiol. 18:811-816.
35. Partanen, J., I. Leinonen and T. Repo. 2001. Effect of accumulated duration of the light period on bud burst In Norway spruce (Picea abies) of varying ages. Silva Fenn. 35:111-117.
36. Perry, T.O. 1971. Dormancy of trees in winter. Science 171: 29-36.
37. Romberger, J.A. 1963. Meristems, growth and development In woody plants. USDA For. Serv. Tech. Bull. 1293, 214 p.
38. Samish, R.M. 1954. Dormancy in woody plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 5:183-204.
39. Sarvas, R. 1972. Investigations on the annual cycle of development of forest trees. Active period. Comm. Inst. For. Fenn. 76:1-110.
40. Sarvas, R. 1974. Investigations on the annual cycle of development of forest trees II. Autumn dormancy and winter dormancy. Comm. Inst. For. Fenn. 84:1-101.
41. Schneider, S.H. 1989. The greenhouse effect: science and policy. Science 243:771-781.
42. Slaney, M., G. Wallin, J. Medhurst and S. Linder. 2007. Impact of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and temperature on bud burst and shoot growth of boreal Norway spruce. Tree Physiol. 27:301-312.
43. Smith, H. and N.P. Kefford. 1964. The chemical regulation of the dormancy phases of bud development. Am. J. Bot. 51:1002-1012.
44. Soikkeli, S. 1980. Ultrastructure of the mesophyll in Scots pine and Norway spruce: seasonal variation and molarity of fixative buffer. Protoplasma 103:241-252.
45. Sudachkova, N.E., I.L. Milyutina, L.I. Romanova and G.P. Semenova. 2004. The annual dynamics of reserve compounds and hydrolytic enzymes activity in the tissues of Pinus sylvestris L. and Larix sibirica Ledeb. The metabolism of reserve compounds in the tissues of Siberian conifers. Eurasian J. For. Res. 7-1:1-10.
46. Sutinen, S., M. Vuorinen and R. Rikala. 2006. Developmental disorders in buds and needles of mature Norway spruce, Picea abies (L.) Karst., in relation to boron concentrations. Trees 20:559-570.
47. Sutinen, S., P.J. Aphalo and T. Lehto. 2007. Does timing of boron application affect needle and bud structure in Scots pine and Norway spruce seedlings? Trees 21:661-670.
48. Svobodová, H., H. Lipavskáand J. Albrechtová. 2000. Nonstructural carbohydrate status in Norway spruce buds in the context of annual bud structural development as affected by acidic pollution. Environ. Exp. Bot. 43:253-265.
49. Weiser, C.J. 1970. Cold resistance and injury in woody plants. Science 169:1269-1278.
50. Yakovlev, I.A., D.K.A. Asante, C.G. Fossdal, J. Partanen, O. Junttila and Ø. Johnsen. 2008. Dehydrins expression related to timing of bud burst in Norway spruce. Planta 228:459-472.