Gendered travel mode choice: a focus on car deficient households

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 24, Issue , 2012, Pages 250-261

  Scheiner, Joachim ^a   Holz Rau, Christian ^a  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Car deficient households; Car use; Gender; Intra household car allocation; Travel mode choice

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE; GENDER DISPARITY; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84865158205     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Aiken Leona.S., West Stephen.G. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park.
2. Anggraini R., Arentze T.A., Timmermans H.J.P. Car allocation between household heads in car deficient households: a decision model. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 2008, 8(4):301-319.
3. Atkins S. Women, travel and personal security. Gender, Transport and Employment: the Impact of Travel Constraints 1989, 169-189. Aldershot, Avebury. M. Grieco, L. Pickup, R. Whipp (Eds.).
4. Beckmann K.J., Holz-Rau C., Rindsfüser G., Scheiner J. Mobilität älterer Menschen - Analysen und verkehrsplanerische Konsequenzen. Strategien zur Sicherung der Mobilität älterer Menschen 2005, 43-71. Köln, TüV. W. Echterhoff (Ed.).
5. Beckmann K.J., Chlond B., Kuhnimhof T., von der Ruhren S., Zumkeller D. Multimodale Verkehrsmittelnutzer im Alltagsverkehr. Internationales Verkehrswesen 2006, 58(4):138-145.
6. Berry W.D., Feldman S. Multiple Regression in Practice 1985, Sage, Newbury Park.
7. Best H., Lanzendorf M. Division of labour and gender differences in metropolitan car use: an empirical study in Cologne, Germany. Journal of Transport Geography 2005, 13(2):109-121.
8. Blumen O. Gender differences in the journey to work. Urban Geography 1994, 15(3):223-245.
9. Borneman E. Das Patriarchat 1975, Fischer, Frankfurt/Main.
10. Brennecke, J., 1994. Alltagsmobilität Wiesbadener Frauen. In: Bracher, T. et al. (Eds.), Handbuch der kommunalen Verkehrsplanung. Kap. 2.2.1.3. Heidelberg: Wichmann.
11. Camstra R. Commuting and gender in a lifestyle perspective. Urban Studies 1996, 33(2):283-300.
12. Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L., Handy S.L. Cross-sectional and quasi-panel explorations of the connection between the built environment and auto ownership. Environment and Planning A 2007, 39(4):830-847.
13. Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L., Handy S.L. The relationship between the built environment and nonwork travel: a case study of Northern California. Transportation Research A 2009, 43(5):548-559.
14. Cervero R. Built environments and mode choice. Toward a normative framework. Transportation Research D 2002, 7(4):265-284.
15. Chlond B., Kuhnimhof T. Panelhandbuch. Das Deutsche Mobilitätspanel: Informationen sowie Anleitung und Anregungen zur Datennutzung 2005, Universität, Karlsruhe.
16. Clark W.A.V., Wang W.W. Job access and commute penalties: balancing work and residence in Los Angeles. Urban Geography 2005, 26(7):610-626.
17. Coulter P.B. Measuring Inequality. A Methodological Handbook 1989, Westview Press, Boulder.
18. Crane R. Is there a quiet revolution in women's travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association 2007, 73(3):298-316.
19. Cresswell T., Uteng T.P. Gendered mobilities: towards an holistic understanding. Gendered mobilities 2008, 1-12. Ashgate, Aldershot. T.P. Uteng, T. Cresswell (Eds.).
20. Dargay J., Hanly M. Volatility of car ownership, commuting mode and time in the UK. Transportation Research A 2007, 41(10):934-948.
21. England K. Suburban pink collar ghettos: the spatial entrapment of women?. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1993, 83(2):225-242.
22. Ettema D., Van der Lippe T. Weekly rhythms in task and time allocation of households. Transportation 2009, 36(2):113-129.
23. Forschungsgruppe Wahlen, 2011. Wahlanalyse Rheinland-Pfalz. <> (14.4.11). http://www.forschungsgruppewahlen.de/Aktuelles/Wahl_Rheinland-Pfalz/.
24. Frändberg L., Vilhelmson B. More or less travel: personal mobility trends in the Swedish population focusing gender and cohort. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19(6):1235-1244.
25. Garson, G.D., 2010. Generalized Linear Models and Generalized Estimating Equations. <> (31.03.11). http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/gzlm_gee.htm.
26. Giuliano G. Public transportation and the travel needs of women. Traffic Quarterly 1979, 33(4):607-615.
27. Giuliano G. Getting there: Women and transportation. The Technological Woman. Interfacing with Tomorrow 1983, 102-112. Praeger, New York. J. Zimmermann (Ed.).
28. Gordon P., Kumar A., Richard H.W. Gender differences in metropolitan travel behavior. Regional Studies 1989, 23(6):499-510.
29. Gender, Transport and Employment: the Impact of Travel Constraints 1989, Avebury, Aldershot. M. Grieco, L. Pickup, R. Whipp (Eds.).
30. Hakim C. Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory 2000, University Press, Oxford.
31. Hall D. Towards a gendered transport geography. Journal of Transport Geography 2004, 12(3):245-247.
32. Hamilton, K., 2005. Women and transport. Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, 3-5 October, 2005.
33. Hamilton K., Jenkins L. A gender audit for public transport: a new policy tool in the tackling of social exclusion. Urban Studies 2000, 37(10):1793-1800.
34. Hanson S., Johnston I. Gender differences in work-trip length: explanations and implications. Urban Geography 1985, 6(3):193-219.
35. Hanson S., Pratt G. Spatial dimensions of the gender division of labor in a local labor market. Urban Geography 1988, 9(2):180-202.
36. Hartmann H. Capitalism, patriarchy, and job segregation by sex. Capitalist Patriarchy 1979, 206-247. Monthly Review Press, New York. Z.R. Eisenstein (Ed.).
37. Hedeker D., Gibbons R.D., Flay B.R. Random-effects regression models for clustered data with an example from smoking prevention research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1994, 62(4):757-765.
38. Hjorthol R. Daily mobility of men and women - a barometer of gender equality?. Gendered Mobilities 2008, 193-210. Ashgate, Aldershot. T.P. Uteng, T. Cresswell (Eds.).
39. Kézdi G. Robust standard error estimation in fixed-effects panel models. Hungarian Statistical Review, Special 2004, 9:96-116.
40. Law R. Beyond 'women and transport': towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility. Progress in Human Geography 1999, 23(4):567-588.
41. Lewis-Beck, M. S., 1980. Applied Regression: An Introduction. Sage University Paper 22. Newbury Park: Sage.
42. Limtanakool N., Dijst M., Schwanen T. The influence of socioeconomic characteristics, land use and travel time considerations on mode choice for medium- and longer-distance trips. Journal of Transport Geography 2006, 14(5):327-341.
43. MacDonald H.I. Women's employment and commuting: explaining the links. Journal of Planning Literature 1999, 13(3):267-283.
44. Mas-Colell A., Whinston M.D., Green J. Microeconomic Theory 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
45. Matthies E., Kuhn S., Klöckner C.A. Travel mode choice of women: the result of limitation, ecological norm or weak habit?. Environment and Behavior 2002, 34(2):163-177.
46. Næss P. Gender differences in the influences of urban structure on daily travel. Gendered Mobilities 2008, 173-192. Ashgate, Aldershot. T.P. Uteng, T. Cresswell (Eds.).
47. Nichols, A., Schaffer, M., 2007. Clustered Errors in Stata. <> (18.01.11). http://www.docstoc.com.
48. Nobis, C., Lenz, B., 2005. Gender differences in travel patterns. role of employment status and household structure. In: Transportation Research Board (Ed), Research on Women's Issues in Transportation Vol. 2: Technical Papers. Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings 35. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, pp. 114-123.
49. Noble, B., 2005. Women's travel: can the circle be squared? In: Transportation Research Board (Ed), Research on Women's Issues in Transportation Vol. 2: Technical Papers. Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings 35. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, pp. 196-209.
50. özkan T., Lajunen T. What causes the differences in driving between young men and women? The effects of gender roles and sex on young drivers' driving behaviour and self-assessment of skills. Transportation Research F 2006, 9:269-277.
51. Petersen, E., Vovsha, P., 2005. A framework for a joint mode choice-household car allocation model. Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, 3-5 October 2005.
52. Pickup L. Women's gender-role and its influence on travel behavior. Built Environment 1984, 10(1):61-68.
53. Polk M. The influence of gender on daily car use and on willingness to reduce car use in Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography 2004, 12(3):185-195.
54. Prashker J., Shiftan Y., Hershkovitch-Sarusi P. Residential choice location, gender and the commute trip to work in Tel Aviv. Journal of Transport Geography 2008, 16(5):332-341.
55. Roorda M.J., Carrasco J.A., Miller E.J. An integrated model of vehicle transactions, activity scheduling and mode choice. Transportation Research B 2009, 43(2):217-229.
56. Rosenbloom S. Editorial: The need for study of women's travel issues. Transportation 1978, 7(4):347-350.
57. Rosenbloom, S., 2006. Understanding women's and men's travel patterns: the research challenge. In: Transportation Research Board (Ed), Research on Women's Issues in Transportation Vol. 1: Conference Overview and Plenary Papers. Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings 35. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, pp. 7-28.
58. Schad H., Funke C., Rommerskirchen S., Vödisch M. Konstanz und Variabilität des Mobilitätsverhaltens im Wochenverlauf 2001, Prognos, Basel.
59. Scheiner J. Does individualisation of travel behaviour exist? Determinants and determination of travel participation and mode choice in West Germany, 1976-2002. Die Erde 2006, 137(4):355-377.
60. Scheiner J. Social inequalities in travel behaviour: trip distances in the context of residential self-selection and lifestyles. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18(6):679-690.
61. Schendera C. Regressionsanalyse mit SPSS 2008, Oldenbourg, München.
62. Schwanen T. Gender differences in chauffeuring children among dual-earner families. The Professional Geographer 2007, 59(4):447-462.
63. Simma A., Axhausen K.W. Structures of commitment in mode use: a comparison of Switzerland, Germany and Great Britain. Transport Policy 2001, 8(4):279-288.
64. Simma A., Axhausen K.W. Interactions Between Travel Behaviour, Accessibility and Personal Characteristics: The Case of the Upper Austria Region 2003, ETH, Zürich.
65. Turner J., Grieco M. Gender and time poverty: the neglected social policy implications of gendered time, transport and travel. Time and Society 2000, 9(1):129-136.
66. Turner T., Niemeier D. Travel to work and household responsibility: new evidence. Transportation 1997, 24(4):397-419.
67. Van Acker V., Witlox F. Car ownership as a mediating variable in car travel behaviour research using a structural equation modelling approach to identify its dual relationship. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18(1):65-74.
68. Van der Lippe T., de Ruijter J., de Ruijter E., Raub W. Persistent inequalities in time use between men and women: a detailed look at the influence of economic circumstances, policies, and culture. European Sociological Review 2011, 27(2):164-179.
69. Vance C., Iovanna R. Gender and the automobile: analysis of nonwork service trips. Transportation Research Record 2007, 2013:54-61.
70. Vance, C., Buchheim, S., Brockfeld, E., 2005. Gender as a determinant of car use: evidence from Germany. In: Transportation Research Board (Ed.), Research on Women's Issues in Transportation Vol. 2: Technical Papers. Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings 35. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, pp. 59-67.
71. Walby S. Theorizing Patriarchy 1990, Blackwell, London.
72. Wen C.-H., Koppelman F.S. A conceptual and methodological framework for the generation of activity-travel patterns. Transportation 2000, 27(1):5-23.
73. Wooldridge J.M. Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics. The American Economic Review 2003, 93(2):133-138.