The cognitive neuroscience of crossmodal correspondences

i-Perception

Volumn 3, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 410-412

  Spence, Charles ^a   Parise, Cesare V ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^c BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive neuroscience; Crossmodal correspondence; ERP; TMS; Ventriloquism effect

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865148641     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20416695     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/i0540ic     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bien, N., ten Oever, S., Goebel, R., & Sack, A. T. (2012). The sound of size: Crossmodal binding in pitch-size synesthesia: A combined TMS, EEG, and psychophysics study. NeuroImage, 59, 663-672. doi:10.1016/j. neuroimage.2011.06.095
2. Bremner, A., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., de Fockert, J., Linnell, K., & Spence, C. (in Press). Bouba and Kiki in Namibia? Western shape-symbolism does not extend to taste in a remote population. Manuscript submitted for publication
3. Ernst, M. O. (2007). Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch. Journal of Vision, 7(5), 7.1-14. doi:10.1167/7.5.7
4. Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2006). Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1191-1203. doi:10.3758/BF03193720
5. Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Liveright
6. Kovic, V., Plunkett, K., & Westermann, G. (2009). The shape of words in the brain. Cognition, 114, 19-28. doi:10.2298/PSI0901005K
7. Marks, L. E. (2004). Cross-modal interactions in speeded classification. In G. A. Calvert, C. Spence., & B. E. Stein (Eds.), Handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 85-105). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
8. Muggleton, N., Tsakanikos, E., Walsh, V., & Ward, J. (2007). Disruption of synaesthesia following TMS of the right posterior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1582-1585. doi:10.1016/j. neuropsychologia.2006.11.021
9. Oberman, L. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2008). Preliminary evidence for deficits in multisensory integration in autism spectrum disorders: The mirror neuron hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 3, 348-355. doi:10.1080/17470910701563681
10. Parise, C. V., & Spence, C. (2009). When birds of a feather flock together: Synesthetic correspondences modulate audiovisual integration in non-synesthetes. PLoS One, 4(5), e5664. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0005664
11. Parise, C. V., & Spence, C. (in press). Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences. To appear in J. Simner & E. Hubbard (Eds.), Oxford handbook of synaesthesia. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
12. Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2003). Hearing colors, tasting shapes. Scientific American, 288, 43-49. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0503-52
13. Ramachandran, V. S., & Oberman, L. M. (2006). Broken mirrors. Scientific American, 295(5), 62-69. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0503-52
14. Sadaghiani, S., Maier, J. X., Noppeney, U. (2009). Natural, metaphoric, and linguistic auditory direction signals have distinct influences on visual motion processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 6490-6499. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5437-08.2009
15. Seo, H.-S., Arshamian, A., Schemmer, K., Scheer, I., Sander, T., Ritter, G., et al. (2010). Cross-modal integration between odors and abstract symbols. Neuroscience Letters, 478, 175-178. doi:10.1016/j. neulet.2010.05.011
16. Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 971-995. doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7
17. Spence, C. (2012). Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 37-54. doi:10.1016/j. jcps.2011.09.004