Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Garcia, Julio ^a,b   Marrufo, Oscar R ^c   Rodriguez, Alfredo O ^c   Larose, Eric ^a   Pibarot, Philippe ^a   Kadem, Lyes ^b  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Aortic Stenosis; Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; Effective Orifice Area; Particle Image Velocimetry; Potential Flow Theory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY;

ADULT; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84865116365     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-23     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bonow, RO, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to. Circulation 118:15 (2008), e523–661 PubMed PMID: 18820172 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190748.
2. Baumgartner, H, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography 22:1 (2009), 1–23 quiz 101-2 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029.
3. Johnson, MA, Moss, RR, Munt, B, Determining aortic stenosis severity: what to do when measuring left ventricular outflow tract diameter is difficult. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography 22:5 (2009), 452–453 10.1016/j.echo.2009.03.018.
4. Dumesnil, JG, Pibarot, P, Carabello, B, Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment. European heart journal 31:3 (2010), 281–289 PubMed PMCID 2814220, PMID: 19737801 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp361.
5. Gleeson, TG, Mwangi, I, Horgan, SJ, Cradock, A, Fitzpatrick, P, Murray, JG, Steady-state free-precession (SSFP) cine MRI in distinguishing normal and bicuspid aortic valves. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI 28:4 (2008), 873–878 PubMed PMID: 18821622 10.1002/jmri.21547.
6. John, AS, et al. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis How does it compare to current diagnostic standards?. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:3 (2003), 519–526 PubMed PMID: 12906983 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00707-1.
7. Sondergaard, L, et al. Valve area and cardiac output in aortic stenosis: quantification by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Am H J 126:5 (1993), 1156–1164 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90669-Z.
8. Cawley, PJ, Maki, JH, Otto, CM, Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for valvular heart disease: technique and validation. Circulation 119:3 (2009), 468–478 PubMed PMID: 19171869 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742486.
9. Pibarot, P, Larose, E, What our eyes see is not necessarily what our heart feels. Cardiology 109:2 (2008), 122–125 PubMed PMID: 17713327 10.1159/000105553.
10. Caruthers, SD, et al. Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography. Circulation 108:18 (2003), 2236–2243 PubMed PMID: 14568899 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095268.47282.A1.
11. Haghi, D, et al. A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography: comparison to right heart catheterization and standard echocardiography. Clinical research in cardiology: official journal of the German Cardiac Society 95:3 (2006), 162–167 10.1007/s00392-006-0355-1.
12. Yap, S-C, et al. A simplified continuity equation approach to the quantification of stenotic bicuspid aortic valves using velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 9:6 (2007), 899–906 10.1080/10976640701693717.
13. Garcia, J, Kadem, L, Larose, E, Clavel, M.-A, Pibarot, P, "Comparison between Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography for the Estimation of Effective Orifice Area in Aortic Stenosis.". Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 13(1), 2011, 25 10.1186/1532-429X-13-25.
14. Kadem, L, et al. A new experimental method for the determination of the effective orifice area based on the acoustical source term. Experiments in Fluids 39:6 (2005), 1051–1060 10.1007/s00348-005-0038-0.
15. Ensley, AE, et al. Fluid mechanic assessment of the total cavopulmonary connection using magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping and digital particle image velocimetry. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 28:10 (2000), 1172–1183 PubMed PMID: 11144978 10.1114/1.1317533.
16. Elkins, C, Markl, M, Pelc, N, Eaton, J, 4D Magnetic resonance velocimetry for mean velocity measurements in complex turbulent flows. Experiments in Fluids 34:4 (2003), 494–503 10.1007/s00348-003-0587-z.
17. Elkins, CJ, Alley, MT, Saetran, L, Eaton, JK, Three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocimetry measurements of turbulence quantities in complex flow. Experiments in Fluids 46:2 (2008), 285–296 10.1007/s00348-008-0559-4.
18. Elkins, CJ, Alley, MT, Magnetic resonance velocimetry: applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the measurement of fluid motion. Experiments in Fluids 43:6 (2007), 823–858 10.1007/s00348-007-0383-2.
19. Iaccarino, G, Elkins, CJ, Towards Rapid Analysis of Turbulent Flows in Complex Internal Passages. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 77:1-4 (2006), 27–39 10.1007/s10494-006-9035-5.
20. Cape, EG, Jones, M, Yamada, I, VanAuker, MD, Valdes-Cruz, LM, Turbulent/viscous interactions control Doppler/catheter pressure discrepancies in aortic stenosis. The role of the Reynolds number. Circulation 94:11 (1996), 2975–2981 PubMed PMID: 8941129 10.1161/01.CIR.94.11.2975.
21. Sturm, C, Li, W, Woodard, J, Hwang, N, "Fluid mechanics of left ventricular assist system outflow housings.". ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs: 1992) 38:3 (1992), M225–7 10.1097/00002480-199207000-00025.
22. Nichols, W, O'Rourke, M, McDonald's blood flow in arteries: theoretical, experimental and clinical principles, 4, 1998, Arnold, London.
23. Zamir, M, The physics of pulsatile flow, 2000, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 10.1007/978-1-4612-1282-9.
24. Borisyuk, A, Experimental study of noise produced by steady flow through a simulated vascular stenosis. Journal of Sound and Vibration 256:3 (2002), 475–498 10.1006/jsvi.2002.5001.
25. Mulder, MM, Hansen, AC, Mohammad, SF, Olsen, DB, In vitro investigation of the St. Jude Medical Isoflow centrifugal pump: Flow visualization and hemolysis studies. Artificial organs 21:8 (1997), 947–953 PubMed PMID: 9247185 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1997.tb00255.x.
26. Yap, CH, Saikrishnan, N, Tamilselvan, G, Yoganathan, AP, "Experimental measurement of dynamic fluid shear stress on the aortic surface of the aortic valve leaflet.". Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology 11:1-2 (2012), 231–244 PubMed PMCID 4390397, PMID: 21465260 10.1007/s10237-011-0306-2.
27. Saxena, R, Lemmon, J, Ellis, J, Yoganathan, AP, An in vitro assessment by means of laser Doppler velocimetry of the medtronic advantage bileaflet mechanical heart valve hinge flow1. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 126:1 (2003), 90–98 PubMed PMID: 12878943 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00581-6.
28. Garcia, J, Kadem, L, Pibarot, P, "Silicone Rubber Trileaflet Valve Assessment Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging". 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE-EMBS, 2010, 5169–5172.
29. Kadem, L, Rieu, R, Dumesnil, JG, Durand, L-G, Pibarot, P, Flow-dependent changes in Doppler-derived aortic valve effective orifice area are real and not due to artifact. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 47:1 (2006), 131–137 PubMed PMID: 16386676 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.100.
30. Lighthill, MJ, On Sound Generated Aerodynamically. I. General Theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 211:1107 (1952), 564–587 10.1098/rspa.1952.0060.
31. Powell, A, Theory of Vortex Sound. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 36:1 (1964), 177–195 10.1121/1.1918931.
32. Howe, M, Theory of Vortex Sound, 2002, 230 Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511755491.
33. Pibarot, P, Dumesnil, JG, Low-flow, low-gradient, normal ejection fraction aortic stenosis. Current cardiology reports 12:2 (2010), 108–115 PubMed PMID: 20425164 10.1007/s11886-010-0090-0.
34. Pibarot, P, Dumesnil, JG, "Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: when the gradient does not fit with the valve area.". Heart (British Cardiac Society) 96:18 (2010), 1431–1433 10.1136/hrt.2010.195149.
35. Hachicha, Z, Dumesnil, JG, Bogaty, P, Pibarot, P, Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 115:22 (2007), 2856–2864 PubMed PMID: 17533183 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681.
36. Sondergaard, L, Ståhlberg, F, Thomsen, C, Stensgaard, A, Lindvig, K, Henriksen, O, Accuracy and precision of MR velocity mapping in measurement of stenotic cross-sectional area, flow rate, and pressure gradient. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI 3:2 (1993), 433–437 PubMed PMID: 8448407 10.1002/jmri.1880030220.
37. Shandas, R, Kwon, J, Valdes-Cruz, L, Real-time 3-dimensional volumetric ultrasound imaging of the vena contracta for stenotic valves with the use of echocardiographic contrast imaging: in vitro pulsatile flow studies. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography 12:7 (1999), 541–550 10.1016/S0894-7317(99)70001-5.
38. Omran, H, et al. Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. The Lancet 361 (2003), 1241–1246 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12978-9.
39. Chambers, J, Bach, D, Dumesnil, J, Otto, CM, Shah, P, Thomas, J, Crossing the Aortic Valve in Severe Aortic Stenosis: No Longer Acceptable?. Journal of Heart Valve Disease 13 (2004), 344–346 PubMed PMID: 15222279.
40. Salfity, MF, Huntley, JM, Graves, MJ, Marklund, O, Cusack, R, Beauregard, Da, "Extending the dynamic range of phase contrast magnetic resonance velocity imaging using advanced higher-dimensional phase unwrapping algorithms.,". Journal of the Royal Society, Interface/the Royal Society 3:8 (2006), 415–427 PubMed PMCID 1578755, PMID: 16849270 10.1098/rsif.2005.0096.
41. Chavez, S, Xiang, Q-S, An, L, Understanding phase maps in MRI: a new cutline phase unwrapping method. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 21:8 (2002), 966–977 PubMed PMID: 12472269 10.1109/TMI.2002.803106.
42. Zhou, K, Zaitsev, M, Bao, S, Reliable two-dimensional phase unwrapping method using region growing and local linear estimation. Magnetic resonance in medicine: official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 62:4 (2009), 1085–1090 10.1002/mrm.22074.
43. Yang GZ, Burger P, Kilner PJ, Karwatowski SP, Firmin DN: "Dynamic range extension of cine velocity measurements using motion-registered spatiotemporal phase unwrapping". Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI. 6 (3): 495-502.