Generating a future land use change scenario with a modified population-coupled Markov Cellular Automata model

Journal of Environmental Informatics

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 108-119

  Tong, S T Y ^a   Sun, Y ^a   Yang, Y J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

CA Markov; Land use modeling; Markov; Multi criteria evaluation; Population growth; Urbanization

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FUTURE PROSPECT; LAND USE CHANGE; MARKOV CHAIN; MODEL VALIDATION; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POPULATION GROWTH; PREDICTION; URBAN PLANNING; URBANIZATION; WATERSHED;

EAST FORK LITTLE MIAMI RIVER; LITTLE MIAMI BASIN; OHIO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84865113261     PISSN: 17262135     EISSN: 16848799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3808/jei.201200213     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abdalla, M. M., Setoodeh, S., and Gurdal, Z. (2006). Cellular automata paradigm for topology optimization, IUTAM Symposium on Topological Design Optimization of Structures, Machines and Materials Springer, Nertherland, 169-180, 2006.
2. Bell, E.J. (1974). Markov analysis of land use change-An application of stochastic processes to remotely sensed data. Socio Econ. Plan. Sci. 8(6), 31l-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-01-21(74) 90034-2
3. Brown, L.A. (1970). On the use of Markov chains in movement. Econ. Geogr. 46, 393-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/143152
4. Cabral, P., and Zamyatin, A. (2006). Three land change models for urban dynamics analysis in Sintra-Cascais area, 1st EARsel Workshop of the SIG Urban Remote Sensing Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, March 2006.
5. Carver, S.J. (1991). Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 5(3), 321-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02693799108927858
6. de Almeida, C.M., Batty, M., Monteiro, A.M.V., Camara, G., Soares-Filho, B.S., Cerqueira, G.G., and Pennachin, C.L. (2003). Stochastic cellular automata modeling of urban land use dynamics: Empirical development and estimation. Comput. Environ. Urban 27(5), 481-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00042-X
7. Debrewer, L.M., Rowe, G.I., Reutter, D.C., Moore, R.C., Hambrook, J.A., and Baker, N.T. (2000). Environmental Setting and Effects on Water Quality in the Great and Little Miami River Basins, Ohio and Indiana Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4201, National Water-Quality Assessment Program, U.S. Geological Survey, Columbus, OH.
8. East Fork LMR Watershed Collaborative. (2007). An Innovative Approach to Identifying Key Priorities for Improving Water Quality in the East Fork Little Miami River: A National Demonstration Project for Watershed Management Final Grant Report, Clermont Office of Environmental Quality, Ohio.
9. Eastman, J.R. (2006). IDRISI Andes Tutorial Clark Labs, Worcester, MA.
10. IDRISI. (2008). IDRISI. Clark Lab, Clark University. http://www. clarklabs.org (accessed August 1, 2008).
11. Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Aegelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., Coomes, O. T., Dirzo, R., Fischer, G., Folke, C., George, P. S., Homewood, K., Imbernon, J., Leemans, R., Li, X., Moran, E. F., Mortimore, M., Ramakrishnan, P. S., Richards, J. F., Skanes, H., Steffen, W., Stone, G. D., Svedin, U., Veldkamp, T. A., Vogel, C., and Xu, J. (2001). The causes of land use and land cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environ. Change 11(4), 261-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3
12. Lerch, N.K., Hale, W.F., and Milliron, E.L. (1975). Soil Survey of Clermont County Department of Agriculture, Ohio.
13. Li, L., Sato, Y., and Zhu, H. (2003). Simulating spatial urban expansion based on a physical process. Landscape Urban Plan. 64(1-2), 67-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00201-3
14. Li, X., and Yeh, A.G. (2002). Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 16(4), 323-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/136588102101 37004
15. Liu, J., Zhan, J., and Deng X. (2005). Spatio-temporal patterns and driving forces of urban land expansion in China during the economic reform era. Ambio 34(6), 450-455.
16. NRCS. (2008). Ohio NRCS technical resources. http://www.oh.nrcs. usda.gov/technical/ (accessed November 19, 2008).
17. Ohio Department of Development. (2010). Population Projection Methodology Population Series, Office of Strategic Research, Ohio.
18. Paegelow, M., and Olmedo, M.T.C. (2005). Possibilities and limits of prospective GIS land cover modeling-a compared case study: Garrotxes (France) and Alta Alpujarra Granadina (Spain). Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 19(6), 697-722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1365881 0500076443
19. Parker, D.C., Manson, S.M., Janssen, M.A., Hoffmann, M.J., and Deadman, P. (2003). Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land use and land cover change: A review. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 93(2), 314-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.9302004
20. Pereira, J.M., and Duckstein, L. (1993). A multiple criteria decisionmaking approach to GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 7(5), 407-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0269379 9308901971
21. Pielke, R., Prins, G., Rayner, S., and Sarewitz, D. (2007). Lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature 445, 597-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.10 38/445597a
22. Pontius, R.G.J. (2000). Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S. 66(8), 1011-1016.
23. Pontius, R.G.J. (2002). Statistical methods to partition effects of quantity and location during comparison of categorical maps at multiple resolutions. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S. 68(10), 1041-1049.
24. Pontius, R.G.J., and Malanson, J. (2005). Comparison of the structure and accuracy of two land use change models. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 19(2), 243-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1365881041000171 3434
25. Pontius, R.G.J., and Schneider, L.C. (2001). Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 85(1-3), 239-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00187-6
26. Pontius, R.G.J., Boersma, W., Castella, J-C., Clarke, K., de Nijs, T., Dietzel, C., Duan, Z., Fotsing, E., Goldstein, N., Kok, K., Koomen, E., Lippitt, C.D., McConnell, W., Sood, A.M. Pijanowski, B., Pithadia, S., Sweeney, S., Trung, T.N., Veldkamp, A.T., and Verburg, P.H. (2008). Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. Ann. Regional Sci. 42(1), 11-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0138-2
27. Proctor, W. (2001). Multi-Criteria Analysis and Environmental Decision-Making: A Case Study of Australia's Forests Ph.D. Thesis, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
28. Saaty, T.L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 15(3), 234-281. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
29. Schneider, W.J. (1957). Relation of geology of streamflow in the Upper Little Miami Basin. The Ohio Journal of Science 57(1), 11.
30. Silva, E.A., and Clarke, K.C. (2002). Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal. Comput. Environ. Urban 26(6), 525-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00014-X
31. Sun, H., Forsythe, W., and Waters, N. (2007). Modeling urban land use change and urban sprawl: Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Netw. Spat. Econ. 7(4), 353-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11067-007-9030-y
32. Tang, J., Wang, L., and Yao, Z. (2007). Spatio-temporal urban landscape change analysis using the Markov chain model and a modified genetic algorithm. Int. J. Remote. Sens. 28(15), 3255-3271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160600962749
33. Thapa, R.B., and Murayama, Y. (2011). Urban growth modeling of Kathmandu metropolitan region, Nepal. Comput. Environ. Urban 35(1), 25-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.07. 005
34. Tobler W.R. (1970). Computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ. Geogr. 46, 234-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.23 07/143141
35. Tong, S.T.Y. (1990). The hydrologic effects of urban land use: A case study of the Little Miami River Basin. Landscape Urban Plan. 19(1), 99-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(90)90037-3
36. Tong, S.T.Y., and Chen, W. (2002). Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality. J. Environ. Manage. 66(4), 377-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jema.2002.0593
37. Tong, S.T.Y., and Naramngam, S. (2007). Modeling the impacts of farming practices on water qualities in the Little Miami River basin. Environ. Manage. 39(6), 853-866. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007 /s00267-006-0307-6
38. Tong, S.T.Y., Liu, A.J., and Goodrich, J.A. (2008). Assessing the water quality impacts of future land-use changes in a rapidly urbanizing watershed. Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 26(1), 3-18. http://dx. doi.org/10.1080/10286600802003393
39. Tong, S.T.Y., Sun, Y., Ranatunga, T., He, J., and Yang, Y.J. (2011). Predicting plausible impacts of sets of climate and land use change scenarios on water resources. Appl. Geogr. 32(2), 477-489. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.06.014
40. US Census Bureau. (2010). United States Census 2000. Bureau of the Census. http://www.census.gov (accessed August 1, 2009).
41. Wang, X. (2001). Integrating water-quality management and land-use planning in a watershed context. J. Environ. Manage. 61(1), 25-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0395
42. Ward, D.P., Murray, A.T., and Phinn, S.R. (2000). A stochastically constrained cellular model of urban growth. Comput. Environ. Urban 24(6), 539-558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(00) 00008-9
43. White, R., and Engelen G. (1993). Cellular automata and fractal urban form: A cellular modeling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environ. Plann. A 1993 (25), 1175-1199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a251175
44. Wolfram, S. (1984). Computation theory of cellular automata. Commun. Math. Phys. 96(1), 15-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF012 17347
45. Wu, F. (2002). Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban land conversions. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 16(8), 795-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658810210157769
46. Ye, B., and Bai, Z. (2008). Simulating land use/cover changes of Nenjiang County based on CA-Markov model. Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture 1(258), 321-329. http://dx. doi. org/10.1007/978-0-387-77251-6_35
47. Zhang, Y.A., Peterman, M.R., Aun, D.L., and Zhang, Y. (2008). Cellular automata: Simulating Alpine tundra vegetation dynamics in response to global warming. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 40(1), 256-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1657/1523-0430(06-048)[ZHANG]2.0.CO;2