Positive margin rates following breast-conserving surgery for stage I-III breast cancer: Palpable versus nonpalpable tumors

Journal of Surgical Research

Volumn 177, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 109-115

  Atkins, Jordan ^a   Mushawah, Fatema Al ^a   Appleton, Catherine M ^b   Cyr, Amy E ^a   Gillanders, William E ^a   Aft, Rebecca L ^a   Eberlein, Timothy J ^a   Gao, Feng ^b   Margenthaler, Julie A ^a  

^a Campus Box 8109 ^*  (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Margin status; Needle localization

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER GRADING; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LYMPH VESSEL METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEEDLE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PALPATION; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICS; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

AGED; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; PALPATION;

EID: 84865092795     PISSN: 00224804     EISSN: 10958673     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.03.045     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. R. Siegel, D. Naishadham, and A. Jemal Cancer statistics, 2012 CA Cancer J Clin 62 2012 10
2. B. Cady, M.D. Stone, and J.G. Schuler The new era in breast cancer. Invasion, size, and nodal involvement dramatically decreasing as a result of mammographic screening Arch Surg 131 1996 301
3. L. Tabár, C.J. Fagerberg, and A. Gad Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare Lancet 1 1985 829
4. M. Morrow, J. White, and J. Moughan Factors predicting the use of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma J Clin Oncol 19 2001 2254
5. B. Fisher, S. Anderson, and J. Bryant Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer N Engl J Med 347 2002 1233
6. U. Veronesi, N. Cascinelli, and L. Mariani Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer N Engl J Med 347 2002 1227
7. J.A. Van Dongen, A.C. Voogd, and I.S. Fentiman Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial J Natl Cancer Inst 92 2000 1143
8. R. Arriagada, M.G. Lê, and F. Rochard Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. Institut Gustave-Roussy Breast Cancer Group J Clin Oncol 14 1996 1558
9. J.A. Jacobson, D.N. Danforth, and K.H. Cowan Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer N Engl J Med 332 1995 907
10. F. Meric, N.Q. Mirza, and G. Vlastos Positive surgical margins and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence predict disease-specific survival after breast-conserving therapy Cancer 97 2003 926
11. C.C. Park, M. Mitsumori, and A. Nixon Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: Influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence J Clin Oncol 18 2000 1668
12. S.E. Singletary Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy Am J Surg 184 2002 383
13. G. Freedman, B. Fowble, and A. Hanlon Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44 1999 1005
14. M. Blichert-Toft, C. Rose, and J.A. Anderson Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: Six years of life table analysis J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 11 1992 19
15. L. Jacobs Positive margins: The challenge continues for breast surgeons Ann Surg Oncol 15 2008 1271
16. R.G. Pleijhuis, M. Graafland, and J. De Vries Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: Current modalities and future directions Ann Surg Oncol 16 2009 2717
17. A.R. Miller, G. Brandao, and T.J. Prihoda Positive margins following surgical resection of breast carcinoma: Analysis of pathologic correlates J Surg Oncol 86 2004 134
18. J.J. Jobsen, J. Van Der Palen, and F. Ong The value of a positive margin for invasive carcinoma in breast-conservative treatment in relation to local recurrence is limited to young women only Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 2003 724
19. J. Kurtz, J. Jacquiemier, and R. Amalric Breast-conserving therapy for macroscopically multiple cancers Ann Surg 212 1990 38
20. E.D. Kurniawan, M.H. Wong, and I. Windle Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program Ann Surg Oncol 15 2008 2542
21. A.B. Chagpar, R.C. Martin, and L.J. Hagendoorn Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique Am J Surg 188 2004 399
22. M.F. Dillon, A.A. Maguire, and E.W. McDermott Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery Mod Pathol 21 2007 39
23. H.A. Frank, F.M. Hall, and M.L. Steer Preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions demonstrated by mammography N Engl J Med 295 1976 259
24. D.B. Kopans, and C.A. Swann Preoperative imaging-guided needle placement and localization of clinically occult breast lesions AJR Am J Roentgenol 152 1989 1
25. C. Mazouni, R. Rouzier, and C. Balleyguier Specimen radiography as predictor of resection margin status in non-palpable breast lesions Clin Radiol 61 2006 789
26. L. Fortunato, R. Penteriani, and M. Farina Intraoperative ultrasound is an effective and preferable technique to localize non-palpable breast tumors Eur J Surg Oncol 34 2008 1289
27. O. Olsha, D. Shemesh, and M. Carmon Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery Ann Surg Oncol 18 2011 447
28. N. Besic, A. Kramaric, and B. Podnar Factors correlated to successful surgical treatment of 181 non-palpable invasive breast carcinomas Breast 18 2009 294
29. M. Thompson, R. Henry-Tillman, and A. Margulies Hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) breast lumpectomy Ann Surg Oncol 14 2007 148
30. S. Van Esser, M.G. Hobbelink, and P.H. Peeters The efficacy of 'radio guided occult lesion localization' (ROLL) versus 'wire-guided localization' (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial - ROLL study BMC Surg 8 2008 9
31. N.M. Krekel, B.M. Zonderhuis, and H.B. Stockmann A comparison of three methods for nonpalpable breast cancer excision Eur J Surg Oncol 37 2011 109
32. N.M. Krekel, B.M. Zonderhuis, and H.W. Schreurs Ultrasound-guided breast-sparing surgery to improve cosmetic outcomes and quality of life: A prospective multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial comparing ultrasound-guided surgery to traditional palpation-guided surgery (COBALT trial) BMC Surg 11 2011 8
33. A. Kobbermann, A. Unzeitig, and X.J. Xie Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates Ann Surg Oncol 18 2011 1349
34. H.Z. Malik, W.D. George, and E.A. Mallon Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: Analysis and follow-up of 543 patients Eur J Surg Oncol 25 1999 464
35. M. Noguchi, M. Minami, and M. Earashi Pathologic assessment of surgical margins on frozen and permanent sections in breast conserving surgery Breast Cancer 2 1995 27
36. S. Weber, F.K. Storm, and J. Stitt The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery Cancer J Sci Am 3 1997 273
37. V.S. Klimberg, K.C. Westbrook, and S. Korourian Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer Ann Surg Oncol 5 1998 220
38. E.K. Valdes, S.K. Boolbol, and J.M. Cohen Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy? Ann Surg Oncol 14 2007 1045