The value of a positive margin for invasive carcinoma in breast-conservative treatment in relation to local recurrence is limited to young women only

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 724-731

  Jobsen, Jan J ^a   Van Der Palen, Job ^a   Ong, Francisca ^a   Meerwaldt, Jacobus H ^a  

^a MEDISCH SPECTRUM TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Age; Breast cancer; Local recurrence; Margin status

Indexed keywords

CARCINOGENS; MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; PATIENT TREATMENT; STATISTICAL METHODS; SURGERY;

DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL (DFS);

ONCOLOGY;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER CONTROL; CANCER HORMONE THERAPY; CANCER INVASION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0141615689     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00644-8     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Recht A. Selecting patients for breast-conserving therapy. Semin Breast Dis. 4:2001;198-206.
2. Borger J., Kemperman H., Hart A., et al. Risk factors in breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 12:1994;653-660.
3. Schnitt S.J., Connolly J.L. Pathological risk factors for local recurrence in patients with invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Semin Breast Dis. 2:1999;230-239.
4. Fourquet A., Campana F., Zafrani B., et al. Prognostic factors of breast recurrence in the conservative management of early breast cancer A 25-year follow-up . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 17:1989;719-725.
5. Smitt M.C., Nowels K.W., Zdeblick M.J., et al. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer. 76:1995;259-267.
6. Kini V.R., Vicini F.A., Frazier R., et al. Mammographic, pathologic, and treatment-related factors associated with local recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 43:1999;341-346.
7. Renton S.C., Gazet J.C., Ford H.T., et al. The importance of the resection margin in conservative surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 22:1996;17-22.
8. Solin L.J., Fowble B.L., Schultz D.J., et al. The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 21:1991;279-287.
9. Touboul E., Buffat L., Belkacémi Y., et al. Local recurrences and distant metastases after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 43:1998;25-38.
10. Tartter P.I., Kaplan J., Bleiweiss I., et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 179:2000;81-85.
11. Magee B., Swindell R., Harris M., et al. Prognostic factors for breast recurrence after conservative surgery and radiotherapy Results from a randomized trial . Radiother Oncol. 39:1996;223-227.
12. Bijker N., Peterse J.L., Duchateau L., et al. Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ; analysis of EORTC trial 10853. J Clin Oncol. 19:2001;2263-2271.
13. Intercooled Stata 7.0 for Windows. College Station: Stata Press; 2001.
14. Park C.C., Mitsumori M., Nixon A., et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer Influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence . J Clin Oncol. 18:2000;1668-1675.
15. Voogd A.C., Peterse J.L., Crommelin M.A., et al. Histologic determinants for different types of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy of invasive breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 35:1999;1828-1837.
16. Obedian E., Haffty B.G. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients. Cancer J Sci Am. 6:2000;28-33.
17. de Jong J.S., van Diest P.J., Baak J.P. Hot spot microvessel density and the mitotic activity index are strong additional prognostic indicators in invasive breast cancer. Histopathology. 36:2000;306-312.
18. Freedman G., Fowble B., Hanlon A. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 44:1999;1005-1015.
19. Cowen D., Houvenaeghel G., Bardou V.-J., et al. Local and distant failures after limited surgery with positive margins and radiotherapy for node-negative breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 47:2000;305-312.
20. Schnitt S.J., Abner A., Gelman R. The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer. 74:1994;1746-1751.
21. Jobsen J.J., van der Palen J., Meerwaldt J.H. The impact of age on local control in women with pT1 breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Eur J Cancer. 37:2001;1820-1827.
22. Bartelink H., Horiot J.C., Poortemans P., et al. Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. N Engl J Med. 19:2001;1378-1387.
23. Nixon A.J., Neuberg D., Hayes D.F., et al. Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and the prognosis for patients with stage I and II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 12:1994;888-894.