No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 470, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 61-68

  Parratte, Sebastien ^a   Pauly, Vanessa ^a   Aubaniac, Jean Manuel ^a   Argenson, Jean Noel A ^a,b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b HÔPITAL SAINTE MARGUERITE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHRITIS; BODY MASS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CRUTCH; DISEASE COURSE; DISLOCATION; FEMALE; FIXED BEARING UNILATERAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE BEARING UNILATERAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONVALESCENCE; FRANCE; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME; WEIGHT BEARING;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COHORT STUDIES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FRANCE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84865070038     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1961-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Ahlback S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1968;Suppl 277:7-72.
2. Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: A three to tenyear follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:2235-2239.
3. Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Aubaniac JM, Dennis DA, Northcut EJ, Anderson DT, Agostini S. In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:1049-1054.
4. Argenson JN, O'Connor JJ. Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement. A one to nine-year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:228-232.
5. Argenson JN, Parratte S. The unicompartmental knee: Design and technical considerations in minimizing wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:137-142.
6. Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:999-1006.
7. Bonutti PM, Dethmers DA. Contemporary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Fixed vs mobile bearing. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23:24-27.
8. Clark M, Campbell DG, Kiss G, Dobson PJ, Lewis PL. Reintervention after mobile-bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:576-580.
9. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed tibial bearing unicompartmental knee prosthesis: A prospective randomized trial using a dedicated outcome score. Knee. 2004;11:357-362.
10. Cooke D, Scudamore A, Li J, Wyss U, Bryant T, Costigan P. Axial lower-limb alignment: Comparison of knee geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1997;5:39-47.
11. Emerson RH Jr, Hansborough T, Reitman RD, Rosenfeldt W, Higgins LL. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:62-70.
12. Emerson RH Jr, Higgins LL. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:118-122.
13. Gibson PH, Goodfellow JW. Stress radiography in degenerative arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:608-609.
14. Gleeson RE, Evans R, Ackroyd CE, Webb J, Newman JH. Fixed or mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement? A comparative cohort study. Knee. 2004;11:379-384.
15. Goodfellow JW, O'Connor J. Clinical results of the Oxford knee: Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;205:21-42.
16. Goodfellow JW, Tibrewal SB, Sherman KP, O'Connor JJ. Unicompartmental Oxford meniscal knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:1-9.
17. Insall J, Walker P. Unicondylar knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;120:83-85.
18. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248: 13-14.
19. Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric observation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-481.
20. Kennedy WR, White RP. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;221:278-285.
21. Komistek RD, Allain J, Anderson DT, Dennis DA, Goutallier D. In vivo kinematics for subjects with and without an anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:315-325.
22. Koskinen E, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen P, Pulkkinen P, Remes V. Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: A follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:499-507.
23. Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V. Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: A prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:128-135.
24. Lewold S, Goodman S, Knutson K, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis. A Swedish multicenter survival study. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:722-731.
25. Li MG, Yao F, Joss B, Ioppolo J, Nivbrant B, Wood D. Mobile vs fixed-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: A randomized study on short term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics. Knee. 2006;13:365-370.
26. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: A ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:983-989.
27. Naudie D, Guerin J, Parker DA, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Miller-Galante prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1931-1935.
28. O'Rourke MR, Gardner JJ, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Vittetoe DA, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. The John Insall Award: Unicompartmental knee replacement: A minimum twenty-oneyear followup, end-result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 440:27-37.
29. Ornetti P, Parratte S, Gossec L, Tavernier C, Argenson JN, Roos EM, Guillemin F, Maillefert JF. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in knee osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;16:423-428.
30. Parratte S, Argenson JN, Pearce O, Pauly V, Auquier P, Aubaniac JM. Medial unicompartmental knee replacement in the under-50s. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:351-356.
31. Patil S, Colwell CW Jr, Ezzet KA, D'Lima DD. Can normal knee kinematics be restored with unicompartmental knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:332-338.
32. Petrie A. Statistics in orthopaedic papers. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1121-1136.
33. Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard U. Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;435:171-180.
34. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:45-49.
35. Robertsson O, Lidgren L. The short-term results of 3 common UKA implants during different periods in Sweden. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:801-807.
36. Scott RD. Three decades of experience with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Mistakes made and lessons learned. Orthopedics. 2006;29:829-831.
37. Scott RD. Mobile-versus fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2010;59:57-60.
38. Smith TO, Hing CB, Davies L, Donell ST. Fixed versus mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement: A meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:599-605.
39. Svard UC, Price AJ. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:191-194.
40. Vorlat P, Putzeys G, Cottenie D, Van Isacker T, Pouliart N, Handelberg F, Casteleyn PP, Gheysen F, Verdonk R. The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: An independent 10-year survival analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14: 40-45.
41. Whittaker JP, Naudie DD, McAuley JP, McCalden RW, Mac-Donald SJ, Bourne RB. Does bearing design influence midterm survivorship of unicompartmental arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:73-81.