Reintervention after mobile-bearing oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 468, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 576-580

  Clark, Marcia ^a   Campbell, David G ^a   Kiss, Greg ^a   Dobson, Peter J ^a   Lewis, Peter L ^a  

^a Wakefield Orthopaedic Clinic   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROSCOPY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE ENDOPROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OXFORD 3 PROSTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; AGED; FEMALE; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 76249105636     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1089-y     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. AOA National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide, Australia: Australian Orthopaedic Association; 2007:1-223. Available at: http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/publications.jsp. Accessed August 28, 2009.
2. RH Emerson Jr LL Higgins 2008 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 118 122 10.2106/JBJS.F.00739 18171965
3. TJ Gioe KK Killeen DP Hoeffel JM Bert TK Comfort K Scheltema S Mehle K Grimm 2003 Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry Clin Orthop Relat Res. 416 111 119 10.1097/01.blo.0000093004. 90435.d1 14646749
4. RE Gleeson R Evans CE Ackroyd J Webb JH Newman 2004 Fixed or mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement? A comparative cohort study Knee. 11 379 384 10.1016/j.knee.2004.06.006 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvktlyitw%3D%3D 15351413 (Pubitemid 39194791)
5. WG Hamilton MB Collier E Tarabee JP McAuley CA Engh Jr GA Engh 2006 Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 21 6 suppl 2 98 107 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.010 16950070 (Pubitemid 44293256)
6. E Koskinen P Paavolainen A Eskelinen P Pulkkinen V Remes 2007 Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1, 819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register Acta Orthop. 78 128 135 10.1080/17453670610013538 17453404 (Pubitemid 46570269)
7. JP McAuley GA Engh DJ Ammeen 2001 Revision of the failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 392 279 282 10.1097/00003086- 200111000-00036 11716396
8. DW Murray JW Goodfellow JJ O'Connor 1998 The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study J Bone Joint Surg Br. 80 983 989 10.1302/0301-620X.80B6.8177 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FmvVekug%3D%3D 9853489
9. H Pandit C Jenkins K Barker CA Dodd DW Murray 2006 The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach J Bone Joint Surg Br. 88 54 60 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.17114 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2Mnnslejuw%3D%3D 16365121 (Pubitemid 43125314)
10. C Rajasekhar S Das A Smith 2004 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 2- to 12-year results in a community hospital J Bone Joint Surg Br. 86 983 985 10.1302/0301-620X.86B7.15157 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvnvVCisw%3D%3D 15446523 (Pubitemid 39255861)
11. UC Svard AJ Price 2001 Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a survival analysis of an independent series J Bone Joint Surg Br. 83 191 194 10.1302/0301-620X.83B2.10966 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3hslGiug%3D%3D 11284563
12. R Verdonk D Cottenie KF Almqvist P Vorlat 2005 The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: a 2-14 year follow-up Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 13 163 166 10.1007/s00167-004-0522-8 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2M7ptFWrsg%3D%3D 15168007 (Pubitemid 40569095)