What has happened to mode 2?

British Journal of Management

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 555-558

  Bartunek, Jean M ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860412357     PISSN: 10453172     EISSN: 14678551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00773.x     Document Type: Note

References (22)

1. van Aken, J. E. (2005). 'Management research as a design science: articulating the research products of Mode 2 knowledge production in management', British Journal of Management, 16, pp. 19-36.
2. Avenier, M. (2010). 'Shaping a constructivist view of organizational design science', Organization Studies, 31, pp. 1229-1255.
3. Bartunek, J. M. (2007). 'Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: towards a relational scholarship of integration', Academy of Management Journal, 50, pp. 1323-1333.
4. Burgoyne, J. and K. T. James (2006). 'Towards best or better practice in corporate leadership development: operational issues in Mode 2 and design science research', British Journal of Management, 17, pp. 303-316.
5. Church, A. H. (2011). 'Bridging the gap between the science and practice of psychology in organizations: state of the practice reflections', Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, pp. 125-128.
6. Gibbons, M. L., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartman, P. Scott and M. Trow (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
7. Hodgkinson, G. P. (2001). 'Editorial', British Journal of Management, 12, pp. S1-S2.
8. Hodgkinson, G. P. and D. M. Rousseau (2009). 'Bridging the rigour-relevance gap in management research: it's already happening!', Journal of Management Studies, 46, pp. 534-546.
9. Hodgkinson, G. P., P. Herriot and N. Anderson (2001). 'Re-aligning the stakeholders in management research: lessons from industrial, work and organizational psychology', British Journal of Management, 9, pp. S41-S48.
10. Kieser, A. and L. Leiner (2009). 'Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable', Journal of Management Studies, 46, pp. 516-533.
11. MacLean, D., R. MacIntosh and S. Grant (2002). 'Mode 2 management research', British Journal of Management, 13, pp. 189-207.
12. Pettigrew, A. M. (2001). 'Management research after modernism', British Journal of Management, 12, pp. S61-S70.
13. Romme, A. G. L. (2003). 'Making a difference: organization as design', Organization Science, 14, pp. 558-573.
14. Rousseau, D. M. (in press). Handbook of Evidence-Based Management: Companies, Classrooms, and Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Rynes, S. L., J. M. Bartunek and R. L. Daft (2001). 'Across the great divide: knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics', Academy of Management Journal, 44, pp. 340-355.
16. Starkey, K. and P. Madan (2001). 'Bridging the relevance gap: aligning stakeholders in the future of management research', British Journal of Management, 12, pp. S3-S26.
17. Starkey, K., A. Hatchuel and S. Tempest (2009). 'Management research and the new logics of discovery and engagement', Journal of Management Studies, 46, pp. 547-558.
18. Swan, J., M. Bresnen, M. Robertson, S. Newell and S. Dopson (2010). 'When policy meets practice: colliding logics and the challenges of 'Mode 2' initiatives in the translation of academic knowledge', Organization Studies, 31, pp. 1311-1340.
19. Tenkasi, R. (2011).'Integrating theory to inform practice: insights from the practitioner-scholar', In. S. A. Mohrman and E. E. Lawler (eds), Useful Research: Advancing Theory and Practice, pp. 211-232. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
20. Tranfield, D. (2002). 'Future challenges for management research', European Management Journal, 20, pp. 409-413.
21. Tranfield, D. and K. Starkey (1998). 'The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: towards policy', British Journal of Management, 9, pp. 341-353.
22. Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.