Prompt-gamma compensation in Rb-82 myocardial perfusion 3D PET/CT

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 247-253

  Esteves, Fabio P ^a   Nye, Jonathan A ^a   Khan, Akbar ^a   Folks, Russell D ^a   Halkar, Raghuveer K ^a   Garcia, Ernest V ^a   Schuster, David M ^a   Lerakis, Stamatios ^a   Raggi, Paolo ^a   Votaw, John R ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attenuation and scatter correction; Coronary artery disease; Image reconstruction; Myocardial perfusion imaging: PET; PET CT imaging

Indexed keywords

RUBIDIUM 82;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE REPERFUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIUM; PERFUSION; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RUBIDIUM RADIOISOTOPES; SCATTERING, RADIATION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77953324366     PISSN: 10713581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-009-9170-1     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Di Carli MF, Dorbala S, Meserve J, El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Moore SC. Clinical myocardial perfusion PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2007;48:783-93.
2. Go RT, Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ, Saha GB, Neumann DR, Underwood DA, et al. A prospective comparison of rubidium-82 PET and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 1990;31:1906-8.
3. Stewart RE, Schwaiger M, Molina E, Popma J, Gacioch GM, Kalus M, et al. Comparison of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 SPECT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:1303-10.
4. Bateman TM, Heller GV, McGhie AI, Friedman JD, Case JA, Bryngelson JR, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: Comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99 m sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:24-33.
5. Marwick TH, Nemec JJ, Stewart WJ, Salcedo EE. Diagnosis of coronary artery disease using exercise echocardiography and positron emission tomography: Comparison and analysis of discrepant results. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1992;5:231-8.
6. Grover-McKay M, Ratib O, Schwaiger M, Wohlgelernter D, Araujo L, Nienaber C, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease with positron emission tomography and rubidium 82. Am Heart J 1992;123:646-52.
7. Demer LL, Gould KL, Goldstein RA, Kirkeeide RL, Mullani NA, Smalling RW, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease severity by positron emission tomography. Comparison with quantitative arteriography in 193 patients. Circulation 1989;79:825-35.
8. Gould KL, Goldstein RA, Mullani NA, Kirkeeide RL, Wong WH, Tewson TJ, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VIII. Clinical feasibility of positron cardiac imaging without a cyclotron using generator-produced rubidium-82. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:775-89.
9. Santana CA, Folks RD, Garcia EV, Verdes L, Sanyal R, Hainer J, et al. Quantitative (82)Rb PET/CT: Development and validation of myocardial perfusion database. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1122-8.
10. Sampson UK, Dorbala S, Limaye A, Kwong R, Di Carli MF. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1052-8.
11. Lederer CM, Shirley VS. Table of isotopes. 7th ed. New York: Wiley; 1978.
12. Martin CC, Christian BT, Satter MR, Nickerson LH, Nickles RJ. Quantitative PET with positron emitters that emit prompt gamma rays. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1995;14:681-7.
13. Lubberink M, Schneider H, Bergström M, Lundqvist H. Quantitative imaging and correction for cascade gamma radiation of 76Br with 2D and 3D PET. Phys Med Biol 2002;47:3519-34.
14. Cherry SR, Dahlbom M, Hoffman EJ. 3D PET using a conventional multislice tomograph without septa. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:655-68.
15. Nye JA, Esteves F, Votaw JR. Minimizing artifacts resulting from respiratory and cardiac motion by optimization of the transmission scan in cardiac PET/CT. Med Phys 2007;34:1901-6.
16. Watson CC, Newport D, Casey ME. A single scatter simulation technique for scatter correction in 3D PET. In: Grangeat P, Amans JL, editors. 1995 International meeting on fully three-dimensional image reconstruction in radiology and nuclear medicine. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996.
17. Beattie BJ, Finn RD, Rowland DJ, Pentlow KS. Quantitative imaging of bromine-76 and yttrium-86 with PET: A method for the removal of spurious activity introduced by cascade gamma rays. Med Phys 2003;30:2410-23.
18. Van Train KF, Areeda J, Garcia EV, Cooke CD, Maddahi J, Kiat H, et al. Quantitative same-day rest-stress technetium-99 m-sestamibi SPECT: Definition and validation of stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality. J Nucl Med 1993;34:1494-502.
19. Votaw JR, White M. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cardiac 82Rb PET studies. J Nucl Med 2001;42:701-6.
20. Knesaurek K, Machac J, Krynyckyi BR, Almeida OD. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional 82Rb myocardial perfusion PET imaging. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1350-6.
21. Esteves FP, Sanyal R, Nye JA, Santana CA, Verdes L, Raggi P. Adenosine stress rubidium-82 PET/computed tomography in patients with known and suspected coronary artery disease. Nucl Med Commun 2008;29:674-8.