-
1
-
-
32544451630
-
Automated essay scoring with e-rater V.2
-
Attali, Y. & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated essay scoring with e-rater V.2. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4, 3-30.
-
(2006)
Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment
, vol.4
, pp. 3-30
-
-
Attali, Y.1
Burstein, J.2
-
2
-
-
4944252441
-
Automated essay evaluation: The Criterion online writing system
-
Burstein, J., Chodorow, M., & Leacock, C. (2004). Automated essay evaluation: The Criterion online writing system. AI Magazine, 25, 27-36.
-
(2004)
AI Magazine
, vol.25
, pp. 27-36
-
-
Burstein, J.1
Chodorow, M.2
Leacock, C.3
-
3
-
-
0036960581
-
Validity issues for performance-based tests scored with computer-automated scoring systems
-
Clauser, B., Kane, M. & Swanson, D. (2002). Validity issues for performance-based tests scored with computer-automated scoring systems. Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 413-432.
-
(2002)
Applied Measurement in Education
, vol.15
, pp. 413-432
-
-
Clauser, B.1
Kane, M.2
Swanson, D.3
-
4
-
-
84865044620
-
-
Retrieved November 15, 2011, from
-
College Board (2011). Essay scoring guide: A framework for scoring SAT essays. Retrieved November 15, 2011, from http://professionals.collegeboard.com/ testing/sat-reasoning/scores/essay/guide
-
(2011)
Essay Scoring Guide: A Framework for Scoring SAT Essays
-
-
-
6
-
-
84990352358
-
Rubrics: Heuristics for developing writing strategies
-
de la Paz, S. (2009). Rubrics: Heuristics for developing writing strategies. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 134-146.
-
(2009)
Assessment for Effective Intervention
, vol.34
, pp. 134-146
-
-
De La Paz, S.1
-
7
-
-
79959776458
-
Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension
-
Graesser, A. & McNamara, D. (2011). Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 371-398.
-
(2011)
Topics in Cognitive Science
, vol.2
, pp. 371-398
-
-
Graesser, A.1
McNamara, D.2
-
8
-
-
84865019583
-
Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation
-
Grimes, D. & Warschauer, M. (2010). Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 8, 4-43.
-
(2010)
Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment
, vol.8
, pp. 4-43
-
-
Grimes, D.1
Warschauer, M.2
-
9
-
-
25444451985
-
-
Boston, MA: Bedford/ St. Martin's
-
th Edition. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's.
-
(2009)
th Edition
-
-
Hacker, D.1
-
11
-
-
76849106644
-
Does automated feedback help students learn to write?
-
Kellogg, R. Whiteford, A., & Quinlan, T. (2010). Does automated feedback help students learn to write? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42, 173-196.
-
(2010)
Journal of Educational Computing Research
, vol.42
, pp. 173-196
-
-
Kellogg, R.1
Whiteford, A.2
Quinlan, T.3
-
12
-
-
85068285700
-
Automatic essay assessment
-
Landauer, T., Laham, D., & Foltz, P. (2003). Automatic essay assessment. Assessment in Education, 10, 295-308.
-
(2003)
Assessment in Education
, vol.10
, pp. 295-308
-
-
Landauer, T.1
Laham, D.2
Foltz, P.3
-
13
-
-
34447530839
-
Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback
-
McGarrell, H., & Verbeem, J. (2007). Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback. ELT Journal. 61, 228-236.
-
(2007)
ELT Journal
, vol.61
, pp. 228-236
-
-
McGarrell, H.1
Verbeem, J.2
-
14
-
-
84899245960
-
Coh-Metrix: An automated tool for theoretical and applied natural language processing
-
P. McCarthy & C. Boonthum (Eds.), Hershey, PA: IGI Global
-
McNamara, D. & Graesser, A. (2011). Coh-Metrix: An automated tool for theoretical and applied natural language processing. In P. McCarthy & C. Boonthum (Eds.), Applied natural language processing and content analysis: Identification, investigation, and resolution. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
-
(2011)
Applied Natural Language Processing and Content Analysis: Identification, Investigation, and Resolution
-
-
McNamara, D.1
Graesser, A.2
-
15
-
-
84899299622
-
The Writing-Pal: Natural language algorithms to support intelligent tutoring on writing strategies
-
P. McCarthy & C. Boonthum (eds.), Hershey, PA: IGI Global
-
McNamara, D., Raine, R., Roscoe, R., Crossley, S., Dai, J., Cai, Z., Renner, A., Brandon, R., Weston, J., Dempsey, K., Lam, D., Sullivan, S., Kim, L., Rus, V., Floyd, R., McCarthy, P., & Graesser, A. (2011). The Writing-Pal: Natural language algorithms to support intelligent tutoring on writing strategies. In P. McCarthy & C. Boonthum (eds.), Applied natural language processing and content analysis: Identification, investigation, and resolution. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
-
(2011)
Applied Natural Language Processing and Content Analysis: Identification, Investigation, and Resolution
-
-
McNamara, D.1
Raine, R.2
Roscoe, R.3
Crossley, S.4
Dai, J.5
Cai, Z.6
Renner, A.7
Brandon, R.8
Weston, J.9
Dempsey, K.10
Lam, D.11
Sullivan, S.12
Kim, L.13
Rus, V.14
Floyd, R.15
McCarthy, P.16
Graesser, A.17
-
16
-
-
80052411264
-
Internal usability testing of automated essay feedback in an intelligent writing tutor
-
R. C. Murray & P. M. McCarthy (Eds.), Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press
-
th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) Conference (pp. 543-548). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
-
(2011)
th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) Conference
, pp. 543-548
-
-
Roscoe, R.1
Varner, L.2
Cai, Z.3
Weston, J.4
Crossley, S.5
McNamara, D.6
-
17
-
-
35349005709
-
An evaluation of the IntelliMetric essay scoring system
-
Rudner, L., Garcia, V., & Welch, C. (2006). An evaluation of the IntelliMetric essay scoring system. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4, 3-21.
-
(2006)
Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment
, vol.4
, pp. 3-21
-
-
Rudner, L.1
Garcia, V.2
Welch, C.3
-
19
-
-
33646201009
-
The impact of automated essay scoring on high stakes writing assessments
-
April. Presented at the
-
Shermis, M. D., Burstein, J. C., & Bliss, L. (2004, April). The impact of automated essay scoring on high stakes writing assessments. Presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA.
-
(2004)
Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA
-
-
Shermis, M.D.1
Burstein, J.C.2
Bliss, L.3
-
22
-
-
33646171261
-
Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda
-
Warschauer, M., & Ware, P. (2006). Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research, 10, 1-24.
-
(2006)
Language Teaching Research
, vol.10
, pp. 1-24
-
-
Warschauer, M.1
Ware, P.2
|