메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 466-471

Developing pedagogically-guided threshold algorithms for intelligent automated essay feedback

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

EID: 84865035365     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper
Times cited : (11)

References (22)
  • 2
    • 4944252441 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Automated essay evaluation: The Criterion online writing system
    • Burstein, J., Chodorow, M., & Leacock, C. (2004). Automated essay evaluation: The Criterion online writing system. AI Magazine, 25, 27-36.
    • (2004) AI Magazine , vol.25 , pp. 27-36
    • Burstein, J.1    Chodorow, M.2    Leacock, C.3
  • 3
    • 0036960581 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Validity issues for performance-based tests scored with computer-automated scoring systems
    • Clauser, B., Kane, M. & Swanson, D. (2002). Validity issues for performance-based tests scored with computer-automated scoring systems. Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 413-432.
    • (2002) Applied Measurement in Education , vol.15 , pp. 413-432
    • Clauser, B.1    Kane, M.2    Swanson, D.3
  • 4
    • 84865044620 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Retrieved November 15, 2011, from
    • College Board (2011). Essay scoring guide: A framework for scoring SAT essays. Retrieved November 15, 2011, from http://professionals.collegeboard.com/ testing/sat-reasoning/scores/essay/guide
    • (2011) Essay Scoring Guide: A Framework for Scoring SAT Essays
  • 6
    • 84990352358 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rubrics: Heuristics for developing writing strategies
    • de la Paz, S. (2009). Rubrics: Heuristics for developing writing strategies. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 134-146.
    • (2009) Assessment for Effective Intervention , vol.34 , pp. 134-146
    • De La Paz, S.1
  • 7
    • 79959776458 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension
    • Graesser, A. & McNamara, D. (2011). Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 371-398.
    • (2011) Topics in Cognitive Science , vol.2 , pp. 371-398
    • Graesser, A.1    McNamara, D.2
  • 8
    • 84865019583 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation
    • Grimes, D. & Warschauer, M. (2010). Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 8, 4-43.
    • (2010) Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment , vol.8 , pp. 4-43
    • Grimes, D.1    Warschauer, M.2
  • 9
    • 25444451985 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Boston, MA: Bedford/ St. Martin's
    • th Edition. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's.
    • (2009) th Edition
    • Hacker, D.1
  • 10
    • 34547538509 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the writing skills of college students
    • Kellogg, R. & Raulerson, B. (2007). Improving the writing skills of college students. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 237-242.
    • (2007) Psychonomic Bulletin and Review , vol.14 , pp. 237-242
    • Kellogg, R.1    Raulerson, B.2
  • 13
    • 34447530839 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback
    • McGarrell, H., & Verbeem, J. (2007). Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback. ELT Journal. 61, 228-236.
    • (2007) ELT Journal , vol.61 , pp. 228-236
    • McGarrell, H.1    Verbeem, J.2
  • 22
    • 33646171261 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda
    • Warschauer, M., & Ware, P. (2006). Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research, 10, 1-24.
    • (2006) Language Teaching Research , vol.10 , pp. 1-24
    • Warschauer, M.1    Ware, P.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.