Multidetector ct fluoroscopy and cone-beam ct-guided percutaneous transthoracic biopsy: Comparison based on patient doses

Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Volumn 151, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 162-165

  Strocchi, S ^a   Colli, V ^a   Conte, L ^b  

^a OSPEDALE DI CIRCOLO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; LUNG; LUNG DISEASE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; LUNG; LUNG DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84864960182     PISSN: 01448420     EISSN: 17423406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncr464     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Cheung, J. Y., Kim, Y., Shim, S. S. and Lim, S. M. Combined fluoroscopy and CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy using a C-arm cone beam CT system: comparison with fluoroscopy-guided biopsy. Korean J. Radiol. 12(1), 89-96 (2011).
2. Kim, G. R. et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy versus conventional CT-guided lung biopsy: a prospective controlled study to asses radiation doses and diagnostic performance. Eur. Radiol. [Published online 22 August 2010] DOI 10.1007/s00330-101-1936-y.
3. Jin, K. N., Park, C. M., Goo, J. M., Lee, H. J., Lee, Y., Kim, J. I., Choi, S. Y. and Kim, H. C. Initial experience of percutaneous tranthoracic needle biopsy of lung nodules using C-arm cone beam CT systems. Eur. Radiol. 20, 2108-2115 (2010).
4. Jones, D. G. and Shrimpton, P. C. Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part III: normalised organ doses for X-ray computed tomography calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. Report 250 of the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) (1991).
5. http://www.impactscan.org.
6. ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Valentin, J. Ed. Ann. ICRP Publication 103 (Elsevier) (2008).
7. http://rsb.info.nih.gov.
8. Vite, C., Mangini, M., Strocchi, S., Novario, R., Tanzi, F., Carrafiello, G., Conte, L. and Fugazzola, C. Dosimetric and image quality assessment of different acquisition protocols of a novel 64 slices CT scanner. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Optics and Photonics. Flynn, M. J. and Hsieh, J. Eds. (SPIE Publications) SPIE 6142 61423G (2006).
9. Colli, V., Strocchi, S., Vite, C., Cacciatori, M., Rizzi, E., Marzoli, L. and Conte, L. Dosimetric and image quality comparison of different 64-slice CT scanners. In: Proceedings of World Congress 2009 of International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, WC 2009 IFMBE, 25/II, Doessel, O. and Schlegel, W. C. Eds. (Springer) pp. 197-200 (2009).
10. http://www.stuk.fi/pcxmc.
11. Khelassi-Toutaoui, N., Berkani, Y., Toutaoui, A. E., Merad, A., Frahi-Amroun, A. and Brahimi, Z. Experimental evaluation of PCXMC and PREPARE codes used in conventional radiology. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 131(3), 374-378 (2008).