Can a tablet device alter undergraduate science students' study behavior and use of technology?

American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 97-107

  Morris, Neil P ^a   Ramsay, Luke ^a   Chauhan, Vikesh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Improving classroom teaching; Interactive learning environments; Pedagogical issues; Postsecondary science education; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864950318     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: 15221229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00104.2011     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arbaugh J. Managing the on-line classroom. A study of technological and behavioral characteristics of web-based MBA courses. J High Technol Manage Res 13: 203-223, 2002.
2. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. Harnessing Technology Schools Survey: Learner Report, 2010 (online). http:// dera.ioe.ac.uk/1555/ [6 February 2012].
3. Conole G, Delaat M, Dillon T, Darby J. Disruptive technologies, pedagogical innovation: What's new: findings from an in-depth study of students' use and perception of technology. Comput Educ 50: 511-524, 2008.
4. Corrin L, Lockyer L, Bennett S. Technological diversity: an investigation of students' technology use in everyday life and academic study. Learn Media Technol 35: 387-401, 2010.
5. Douwes M, Dekraker H, Blatter B. Validity of two methods to assess computer use: self-report by questionnaire and computer use software. Int J Industr Ergonom 37: 425-431, 2007.
6. Evans C. The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Comput Educ 50: 491-498, 2008.
7. Franklin T, Harmelen M. Web 2.0 for content for learning and teaching in higher education. Teach High Educ: 1-29, 2007.
8. Johnson L, Smith R, Willis H, Levine A, Haywood K. The Horizon Report. 2011 Edition (online). http://csn.edu/PDFFiles/OTS/Website%20documents/ getconnected/HR2011.pdf [6 February 2012].
9. Jones C, Ramanau R, Cross S, Healing G. Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university? Comput Educ 54: 722-732, 2010.
10. Judd T, Kennedy G. A five-year study of on-campus Internet use by undergraduate biomedical students. Comput Educ 55: 1564-1571, 2010.
11. Kennedy G, Dalgarno B, Gray K, Judd T, Waycott J, Bennett S, Maton K, Bishop A, Chang R, Churchward A. The Net Generation Are Not Big Users of Web 2.0 Technologies: Preliminary Findings (online). http:// content.imamu.edu.sa/Scholars/it/net/kennedy.pdf [6 February 2012].
12. Kennedy GE, Judd TS, Churchward A, Gray K. First year students' experiences with technology: are they really digital natives? Austr J Educ Technol 24: 108-122, 2008.
13. Margaryan A, Littlejohn A, Vojt G. Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies. Comput Educ 56: 429-440, 2011.
14. Marmarelli T, Ringle M. The Reed College iPad Study (online). http:// 134.10.15.75/cis/about/ipad_pilot/Reed_ipad_report.pdf [6 February 2012].
15. Mary B, Gawelek A, Spataro M, Komarny P. On iPads why mobile? EDUCAUSE Rev 46: 28-31, 2011.
16. Mayes T, Morrison D, Mellar H, Bullen P, Oliver M. Transforming Higher Education Through Technology Enhanced Learning (online). http:// www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/learningandtech/transforming_he_ through_technology_enhanced_learning [6 February 2012].
17. McKinney D, Dyck JL, Luber ES. iTunes University and the classroom: can podcasts replace professors? Comput Educ 52: 617-623, 2009.
18. Morris NP. Podcasts and mobile assessment enhance student learning experience and academic performance. Biosci Educ e-J 16: 1, 2010.
19. Motiwalla L. Mobile learning: a framework and evaluation. Comput Educ 49: 581-596, 2007.
20. Naismith L, Lonsdale P, Vavoula G, Sharples M. Literature review in mobile technologies and learning. Technology 11: 48, 2004.
21. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. Part 1. On the Horizon 9: 1-6, 2001.
22. Redecker C. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Learning 2.0: the Impact of Web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe. Final Report (online). http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC55629.pdf [6 February 2012].
23. Selwyn N. An investigation of differences in undergraduates' academic use of the internet. Active Learn High Educ 9: 11-22, 2008.
24. Sharpe R, Benfield G, Roberts G, Francis R. The Undergraduate Experience of Blended e-Learning: a Review of UK Literature and Practice (online). http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/research/literature_reviews/ blended_elearning_full_review.pdf.
25. Smith SD, Caruso JB. ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Technology, 2010 (online). http://www.educause.edu/ers1006 [6 February 2010].
26. Sun PC, Tsai RJ, Finger G, Chen YY, Yeh D. What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Comput Educ 50: 1183-1202, 2008.
27. Vogel D, Kennedy D, Kwok RCW. Does using mobile device applications lead to learning? J Interact Learn Res 20: 469-485, 2009.
28. Wang M, Shen R, Novak D, Pan X. The impact of mobile learning on students' learning behaviours and performance: report from a large blended classroom. Br J Educ Technol 40: 673-695, 2009.