Towards integrating technology supported peer-to-peer assessments into mathematics education: Experiences with iPad mobile tablet technology

CSEDU 2012 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Supported Education

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages 119-125

  Isabwe, Ghislain Maurice Norbert ^a   Reichert, Frank ^a   Nyberg, Svein Olav ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Formative assessment; Mobile technology; Peer assessment

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING EDUCATION; HAND HELD COMPUTERS; PEER TO PEER NETWORKS;

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGY; LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; LEARNING PROCESS; MATHEMATICS EDUCATION; MOBILE TECHNOLOGY; PEER ASSESSMENT; PEER TO PEER ASSESSMENT; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84864878588     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. AL-Smadi, M., Guetl, C., and Kappe, F. (2010). Peer assessment system for modern learning settings: Towards a flexible e-assessment system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 5.
2. th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, (AAEE 2009), Adelaide, Australia, pp.765-770.
3. Chen, C. (2010) The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system. Computers and Education, 55, pp.229-236.
4. Clauss, A. (2011). iCab Mobile - Web Browser. Available on http://www.icab-mobile.de/. Last accessed: December 2011.
5. De-Marcos, L., Hilera, J. R., Barchino, R., Jimenez, L., Martines, J. J., Gutierrez, J. A., Gutierrez, J.M., Oton, S. (2010). An experiment for improving students performance in secondary and tertiary education by means of m-learning auto-assessment. Computers and Education, 55, pp.1069-1079.
6. Egodawatte, G. (2010) A rubric to self-assess and peer-assess mathematical problem solving tasks of college students. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 3(1), pp.75-88.
7. Falchikov, N. (2003). Involving students in assessment. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 3(32), pp. 102-108.
8. Isabwe, G. M. N., Oysaed, H., and Reichert, F. (2011). On the Mobile Technology Enabled Peer-Evaluation: A User Centric Approach. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Computing and ICT Research (ICCIR11), Makerere, Uganda, pp.272-285.
9. Nielsen, J. and Landauer, T. K. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In Proceedings of ACM INTERCHI'93 Conference, pages 206-213.
10. Nielsen, J. (1994). Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 41:385-397.
11. Pearson Plc (2011). Fronter Learning Management System. Available http://com.fronter.info/. Last accessed December 2011.
12. Wen, M. L., and Tsai, C. (2008). Online peer assessment in an inservice science and mathematics teacher education course. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), pp. 55-67.