Bioprospecting metagenomics for new glycoside hydrolases

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 908, Issue , 2012, Pages 141-151

  Gilbert, Jack ^a   Li, Luen Luen ^b   Taghavi, Safiyh ^c   McCorkle, Sean M ^b   Tringe, Susannah ^d   Van Der Lelie, Daniel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^d DOE JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

16S rRNA; Biomass decay community; Cellulase; Glycoside hydrolase; Metagenomics

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; GLYCOSIDASE; RNA 16S;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; DATA MINING; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; METAGENOMICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR CLONING; OPEN READING FRAME;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BIOMASS; CLONING, MOLECULAR; DATA MINING; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENETIC VARIATION; GLYCOSIDE HYDROLASES; METAGENOMICS; OPEN READING FRAMES; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S;

EID: 84864863043     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-956-3_14     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Himmel M E ( ed) (2008) Biomass recalcitrance -deconstructing the plant cell wall for bioenergy. Blackwell, London
2. Himmel ME (ed) et al (1997) Fuels and chemicals from biomass. American Chemical Society Symposium Series, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
3. Bayer EA, Shimon LJ et al (1998) Cellulosomesstructure and ultrastructure. J Struct Biol 124:221-234
4. Bayer EA, Belaich J-P et al (2004) The cellulosomes: multienzyme machines for degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Annu Rev Microbiol 58:521-554 (Pubitemid 39551996)
5. Ferrer M, Golyshina OV et al (2005) Novel hydrolase diversity retrieved from a metagenome library of bovine rumen micro fl ora. Environ Microbiol 7:1966-2010
6. Feng Y, Duan C et al (2007) Cloning and identi fi cation of novel cellulase genes from uncultured microorganisms in rabbit cecum and characterization of the expressed cellulases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 75:319-328 (Pubitemid 46866527)
7. Flint HJ, Bayer EA et al (2008) Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:121-131
8. Singh B, Gautam SK et al (2008) Metagenomics in animal gastrointestinal ecosystem: potential biotechnological prospects. Anaerobe 14: 138-144
9. Warnecke F, Luginbuhl P et al (2007) Metagenomic and functional analysis of hindgut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite. Nature 450:560-565. (Pubitemid 350190243)
10. Ohkuma M (2008) Symbioses of fl agellates and prokaryotes in the gut of lower termites. Trends Microbiol 16:345-352.
11. Scharf ME, Tartar A (2008) Termite digestomes as sources for novel lignocellulases. Biofuels, Bioprod Bioref 2:540-552.
12. Zachary A, Colwell RR (1979) Gut-associated micro fl ora of Limnoria tripunctata in marine creosote-treated wood pilings. Nature 282: 716-717.
13. Yu H, Zeng G et al (2007) Microbial community succession and lignocellulose degradation during agricultural waste composting. Biodegradation 18:793-802. (Pubitemid 47624342)
14. Schluter A, Bekel T et al (2008) The metagenome of a biogas-producing microbial community of a production-scale biogas plant fermenter analysed by the 454-pyrosequencing technology. J Biotechnol 136:77-90.
15. Allgaier M, Reddy A et al (2010) Targeted discovery of glycoside hydrolases from a switchgrass-adapted compost community. PLoS ONE 5:e8812.
16. Whitman WB, Coleman DC et al (1998) Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:6578-6583. (Pubitemid 28278022)
17. Amann RJ, Binder BL et al (1990) Combination of 16S rRNA targeted oligonucleotide probes with fl ow-cemetry for analysing mixed microbial populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1910-1925.
18. Tyson GW, Chapman J et al (2004) Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment. Nature 428:37-43. (Pubitemid 38332350)
19. Daniel R (2005) The metagenomics of soil. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:470-478. (Pubitemid 40716173)
20. Lorenz P, Eck J (2005) Metagenomics and industrial applications. Nature 3:510-516. (Pubitemid 40716178)
21. Li LL, McCorkle S et al (2009) Bioprospecting metagenomes: glycosyl hydrolases for converting biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels 2:10.
22. Lesaulnier C, Papamichail D et al (2008) Elevated atmospheric CO 2 affects soil microbial diversity associated with trembling aspen. Environ Microbiol 10:926-941. (Pubitemid 351406090)
23. Costello EK, Lauber CL et al (2009) Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 326:1694-1697.
24. Foster JS, Green SJ et al (2009) Molecular and morphological characterization of cyanobacterial diversity in the stromatolites of Highborne Cay, Bahamas. ISME J 3:573-587.
25. Caporaso JG, Field D et al. Everything is everywhere: a 19th century hypothesis con fi rmed with 21st century science. ISME J (in Press)
26. Gilbert JA, Field D et al (2009) The seasonal structure of microbial communities in the Western English Channel. Environ Microbiol 11:3132-3139.
27. Suen G, Scott JJ et al (2010) An insect herbivore microbiome with high plant biomassdegrading capacity. PLoS Genet 6(9)
28. Gianoulis TA, Raes J et al (2009) Quantifying environmental adaptation of metabolic pathways in metagenomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:1374-1379.
29. van der Lelie D, Taghavi S, McCorkle SM, Li L-L, Malfatti SA, Monteleono D, Donohoe BS, Ding S-Y, Adney WS, Himmel ME, Tringe SG (2012) The metagenome of an anaerobic microbial community decomposing poplar wood chips, PLoS One 7(5)
30. Gilbert JA, Field D et al (2010) The taxonomic and functional diversity of microbes at a temperate coastal site: a 'multi-omic' study of seasonal and diel temporal variation. PLoS One 5:e15545.
31. Noguchi H, Park J et al (2006) MetaGene: prokaryotic gene fi nding from environmental genome shotgun sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 34:5623-5630. (Pubitemid 44742449)
32. Henrissat B (1991) A classi fi cation of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities. Biochem J 280:309-316.
33. Claudel-Renard C, Chevalet C, Faraut T, Kahn D (2003) Enzyme-speci fi c pro fi les for genome annotation: PRIAM. Nucleic Acids Res 31:6633-6639.
34. Bateman A, Coin L, Durbin R, Finn RD, Hollich V, Grif fi ths-Jones S, Khanna A, Marshall M, Moxon S, Sonnhammer EL, Studholme DJ, Yeats C, Eddy SR (2004) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 32(Database issue):D138-D141. (Pubitemid 38081623)
35. Rost B, Yachdav G, Liu J (2004) The PredictProtein Server. Nucleic Acids Res 32(Web Server issue):W321-W326. (Pubitemid 39004075)
36. Selengut JD, Haft DH, Davidsen T, Ganapathy A, Gwinn-Giglio M, Nelson WC, Richter AR, White O (2007) TIGRFAMs and Genome Properties: tools for the assignment of molecular function and biological process in prokaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 35(Database issue):D260-D264. (Pubitemid 46056210)
37. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM et al (2009) The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 37(suppl 1):D233-238.
38. Li L-L, Taghavi S, McCorkle SM, Zhang Y-B, Blewitt MG, Brunecky R , Adney WS, Himmel ME, Brumm P, Drinkwater C, Mead DA, Tringe SG, van der Lelie D (2011) Biopros pecting metagenomics of decaying wood: mining for new glycoside hydrolases. Biotech Biofuels 4(23)