Using a Cs fountain to test Lorentz invariance

Proceedings of the 20th European Frequency and Time Forum, EFTF 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 189-193

  Wolf, P ^a,b   Chapelet, F ^a   Bize, S ^a   Clairon, A ^a  

^a OBSERVATOIRE DE PARIS   (France)

^b PAVILLON DE BRETEUIL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FOUNTAIN CLOCKS; ATOMIC FREQUENCY; ATOMIC TRANSITION FREQUENCY; LASER-COOLED; LORENTZ; LORENTZ INVARIANCE; ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE; PARAMETER SPACES; STANDARD MODEL EXTENSIONS; ZEEMAN SUBSTATES;

ATOMIC CLOCKS; CESIUM;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 84864842405     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Kostelecký V.A., Samuel S., Phys.Rev.D39, 683, (1989).
2. Damour T., gr-qc/9711060 (1997).
3. Gambini R., Pullin J., Phys. Rev. D59, 124021, (1999).
4. Colladay D., Kostelecký V.A., Phys.Rev.D55, 6760, (1997);
5. Colladay D., Kostelecký V.A., Phys.Rev.D58, 116002, (1998);
6. Kostelecký V.A., Phys.Rev.D69, 105009, (2004).
7. Kostelecký V.A., Lane C.D., Phys.Rev.D60, 116010, (1999).
8. Bluhm R., et al., Phys. Rev. D68, 125008, (2003).
9. Berglund C.J., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1879, (1995);
10. Phillips D.F. et al., Phys. Rev. D63, 111101(R), (2001);
11. Humphrey M.A., arXiv:physics/0103068; Phys. Rev. A62, 063405, (2000).
12. Bear D. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5038, (2000).
13. Hou L.-S., NiW.-T., Li Y.-C.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 201101, (2003);
14. Bluhm R. and Kostelecky V.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1381, (2000).
15. Cané F. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 230801, (2004).
16. Müller H., Phys. Rev. D71, 045004, (2005).
17. Wolf P., et al., Phys. Rev. D70, 051902(R), (2004).
18. Müller H. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 2, 020401, (2003).
19. Lane C.D., Phys. Rev. D72, 016005, (2005).
20. Saathoff G., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 19, 190403, (2003).
21. Bize S., et al., J. Phys. B38, S449, (2005).
22. As discussed in [5] the Schmidt nuclear model only allows an approximate calculation of the SME frequency shift, with more complex models generally leading to dependences on additional SME parameters. Nonetheless, the model is sufficient to derive the leading order terms and has been used for the analysis of most experiments providing the bounds in Tab. I.
23. Vanier J., Audoin C., The Qunatum Physics of Atomic Frequency Standards, Adam Hilger, (1989).
24. Kostelecky A.V. and Mewes M., Phys. Rev. D66, 056005, (2002).
25. Salomon C., et al., C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 2, 1313, (2001).