Performance of computed radiography and direct digital radiography in a screening setting: Effect on the screening indicators

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7361 LNCS, Issue , 2012, Pages 189-196

  Van Ongeval, Chantal ^a   Postema, Sandra ^a   Van Steen, André ^a   Putte, Gretel Vande ^b   Van Limbergen, Erik ^b   Zanca, Federica ^a   Bosmans, Hilde ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

breast cancer screening; digital imaging; mammography

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER SCREENING; CANCER DETECTION; COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL IMAGING; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU; FILM-SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY; FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHIC; MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEM; P-VALUES; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; RECALL RATE; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; TECHNICAL ASPECTS;

DISEASES; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 84864835433     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_25     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Tabar, L., Vitak, B., TonyChen, H.H., Yen, M.F., Duffy, S.W., Smith, R.A.: Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91(9), 1724-1731 (2001
2. Skaane, P., Skjennald, A.: Screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with softcopy reading: randomized trial in population-based screening program -The Oslo II study. Radiology 232, 197-204 (2004
3. Vigeland, E., Klaasen, H., Klingen, T.A., et al.: Full-field digital mammography compared to screen-film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening program: the Vestfold County Study. Eur. Radiol. 18, 183-191 (2008
4. Vinnicombe, S., Pereira, P., McCormack, F., et al.: Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK Breast Screening Program and Systematic review of published data. Radiology 251, 347-358 (2009
5. Karssemeijer, N., Bluekens, A.M., Beijerinck, D., Deurenberg, J.J., Beekman, M., Visser, R., van Engen, R., Bartels-Kortland, A., Broeders, M.J.: Breast Cancer Screening Results 5 Years after Introduction of Digital Mammography in a Population-based Screening Program. Radiology 253(2), 353-358 (2009
6. Del Turco, M.R., Mantellini, P., Ciatto, S., et al.: Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR 189, 860-866 (2007
7. Marshall, N.W., Monnin, P., Bosmans, H., Bochud, F.O., Verdun, F.R.: Image quality assessment in digital mammography: Part I. Technical characterization of the systems. Phys. Med. Biol. 56(14), 4201-4220 (2011
8. Bick, U., Diekmann, F.: Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know? Eur. Rad. 17(8), 1931-1942 (2007
9. Heddson, B., Rönnow, K., Olsson, M., Millder, D.: Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program. Eur. J. Rad. 64, 419-425 (2007
10. Hendrick, R.E., Cole, E.B., Pisano, E.D., et al.: Accuracy of Soft-Copy Digital Mammography versus that of Screen-Film Mammography according to Digital Manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST Retrospective Multireader Study. Radiology 247(1), 38-48 (2008
11. Schueller, G., Riedl, C., Mallek, R., Eibenberger, K., Langenberger, H., Kaindl, E., Kulinna-Cosentini, C., Rudas, M., Helbich, T.: Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates. Eur. J. Radiol. 67(3), 487-496 (2008
12. Schulz-Wendtland, R., Lell, M., Wenkel, E., Böhner, C., Dassel, M.S., Bautz, W.: DR (a-Se) versus CR (DLR) -is an improvement of the accuracy possible? A retrospective histologic analysis (n = 100). Röntgenpraxis 56(4), 129-135 (2007) (in German
13. Van Ongeval, C., Van Steen, A., Vande Putte, G., Zanca, F., Bosmans, H., Marchal, G., Van Limbergen, E.: Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography? Eur. Radiol. 20(10), 2307-2314 (2010
14. van Engen, R., Young, K., Bosmans, H., Thijssen, M.: The European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening. Part B: Digital mammography. In: Fourth Edition of the European Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening (2005), http://www.euref.org
15. Vlaams Agentschap Zorg en Gezondheid, Afdeling Preventie, Belgium. Draaiboek Vlaams bevolkingsonderzoek naar borstkanker, http://www.zorg-en- gezondheid.be
16. Thierens, H., Bosmans, H., Buls, N., De Hauwere, A., Bacher, K., Jacobs, J., Clerinx, P.: Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems for screening within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme. Eur. J. Radiol. 70(3), 539-548 (2009
17. Perry, N., Broeders, M., de Wolf, C., Törnberg, S., Holland, R., von Karsa, L.: European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening, 3rd edn. European Commission, Luxembourg (2006
18. Skaane, P.: Digital Mammography in European population-based screening programs. In: Bick, U., Diekmann, F. (eds.) Medical Radiology -Diagnostic Imaging (2009) ISBN 978-3-540-78449-4;
19. Baert, A.L., Reiser, M.F., Hricak, H., Knauth, M. (eds) Digital Mammography.
20. Warren, L.M., Mackenzie, A., Cooke, J., Given-Wilson, R., Wallis, M.G., Chakraborty, D.P., Dance, D.R., Young, K.C.: Investigating the relationship between calcification cluster detection in digital mammography and threshold gold thickness measurements. In: Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 8313, pp. 8313-8318 (2012)