Incorporating published univariable associations in diagnostic and prognostic modeling

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  A Debray, Thomas P ^a   Koffijberg, Hendrik ^a   Lu, Difei ^b   Vergouwe, Yvonne ^a,b   Steyerberg, Ewout W ^b   M Moons, Karel G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HUMAN; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RISK FACTORS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84864822196     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-121     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker. Moons KGM, Kengne AP, Woodward M, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, Altman DG, Grobbee DE, Heart 2012 683 690 [doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301246]
2. Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice. Moons KGM, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, Royston P, Br Med J 2009 338 606 10.1136/bmj.b606
3. Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L, New England J Med 1985 313 13 793 799 10.1056/NEJM198509263131306 (Pubitemid 15232315)
4. Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Reilly BM, Evans AT, Ann Internal Med 2006 144 3 201 209 (Pubitemid 46780691)
5. Steyerberg EW, Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating New York: Springer 2009
6. Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data. Stewart LA, Stat Med 1995 14 19 2057 2079 10.1002/sim.4780141902 8552887
7. Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting. Riley RD, Lambert PC, Abo-Zaid G, Br Med J 2010 340 221 10.1136/bmj.c221
8. To IPD or not to IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data. Stewart LA, Tierney JF, Eval Health Professions 2002 25 76 97 10.1177/0163278702025001006 (Pubitemid 34157785)
9. Commentary: meta-analysis of individual participants' data in genetic epidemiology. Ioannidis JPA, Rosenberg PS, Goedert JJ, O'Brien TR, A J Epidemiol 2002 156 3 204 210 10.1093/aje/kwf031 (Pubitemid 34810473)
10. Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hlatky MA, Greenland P, Arnett DK, Ballantyne CM, Criqui MH, Elkind MSV, Go AS, Harrell FEJ, Hong Y, Howard BV, Howard VJ, Hsue PY, Kramer CM, McConnell JP, Normand SLT, O'Donnell CJ, Smith SCJ, Wilson PWF, Circulation 2009 119 17 2408 2416 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192278 19364974
11. Criteria for scientific evaluation of novel markers: a perspective. Moons KGM, Clin Chem 2010 56 4 537 541 10.1373/clinchem.2009.134155 20133890
12. Prognostic markers in cancer: the evolution of evidence from single studies to meta-analysis, and beyond. Riley RD, Sauerbrei W, Altman DG, Br J Cancer 2009 100 8 1219 1229 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604999 19367280
13. Review of analytical methods for prospective cohort studies using time to event data: single studies and implications for meta-analysis. Bennett DA, Stat Methods Med Res 2003 12 4 297 319 10.1191/0962280203sm319ra 12939098 (Pubitemid 36992597)
14. Doing new research? Don't forget the old. Clarke M, PLoS Med 2004 1 2 35 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010035 15578106 (Pubitemid 40412706)
15. The increasing body of research data in clinical medicine has led to the need for evidence synthesis studies. Preface. Falagas ME, Infectious Dis Clinics North Am 2009 23 2 iii 10.1016/j.idc.2009.02.002
16. Where Next for Evidence Synthesis of Prognostic Marker Studies? Improving the Quality and Reporting of Primary Studies to Facilitate Clinically Relevant Evidence-Based Results. Riley R, Abrams K, Lambert P, Sutton A, Altman D, Advances in Statistical Methods for the Health Sciences, Auget J, Balakrishnan N, Mesbah M, Molenberghs G, 2007 39 58 [Statistics for Industry and Technology]
17. Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research. Sutton AJ, Cooper NJ, Jones DR, BMC Med Res Methodology 2009 9 29 10.1186/1471-2288-9-29
18. Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature. Greenland S, Epidemiologic Rev 1987 9 1 30
19. Prognostic models based on literature and individual patient data in logistic regression analysis. Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Van Houwelingen JC, Lee KL, Habbema JD, Stat Med 2000 19 2 141 160 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000130) 19:2<141::AID-SIM334>3.0.CO;2-O 10641021 (Pubitemid 30051239)
20. Evidence synthesis combining individual patient data and aggregate data: a systematic review identified current practice and possible methods. Riley RD, Simmonds MC, Look MP, J Clin Epidemiol 2007 60 5 431 439 17419953
21. Evidence-Based Assessment and Application of Prognostic Markers: The Long Way from Single Studies to Meta-Analysis. Sauerbrei W, Holländer N, Riley R, Altman D, Commun Stat Theory Methods 2006 35 7 1333 1342 10.1080/ 03610920600629666 (Pubitemid 44229796)
22. Perioperative mortality of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. A clinical prediction rule based on literature and individual patient data. Steyerberg EW, Kievit J, de Mol Van Otterloo JC, van Bockel JH, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD, Arch Internal Med 1995 155 18 1998 2004 10.1001/archinte.1995. 00430180108012
23. Closed Form and Dually Consistent Methods for Inference on Strict Collapsibility in 2 x 2 x K and 2 x J x K Tables. Greenland S, Mickey RM, J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat) 1988 37 3 335 343
24. Some Surprising Results about Covariate Adjustment in Logistic Regression Models. Robinson LD, Jewell NP, Int Stat Rev / Revue Internationale de Statistique 1991 59 2 227 240 10.2307/1403444
25. Davison A, Hinkley D, Bootstrap Methods App. No. 1 in Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997
26. On the existence of maximum likelihood estimates in logistic regression models. Albert A, Anderson J, Biometrika 1984 71 1 10 10.1093/biomet/71.1.1
27. Partial separation in Logistic Discrimination. Lesaffre E, Albert A, J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 1989 51 109 116
28. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR, J Clin Epidemioly 1996 49 12 1373 1379 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3 (Pubitemid 27028925)
29. A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. Gelman A, Jakulin A, Pittau MG, Su YS, Ann Appl Stat 2008 2 4 1360 1383 10.1214/08-AOAS191
30. Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting. Normand SL, Stat Med 1999 18 3 321 359 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990215)18:3<321:: AID-SIM28>3.0.CO;2-P 10070677
31. Fixed- and Random-Effects Models in Meta-Analysis. Hedges LV, Vevea JL, Psychological Methods 1998 3 4 486 504 (Pubitemid 128459639)
32. The design of simulation studies in medical statistics. Burton A, Altman DG, Royston P, Holder RL, Stat Med 2006 25 24 4279 4292 10.1002/sim.2673 16947139 (Pubitemid 46023772)
33. Collinearity, Power, and Interpretation of Multiple Regression Analysis. Mason CH, Perreault WDJ, J Marketing Res 1991 28 268 280 10.2307/3172863
34. Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Greenland S, Am J Epidemiol 1994 140 3 290 296 8030632
35. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Br Med J 2003 327 7414 557 560 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 (Pubitemid 37088507)
36. Aggregating published prediction models with individual participant data: a comparison of different approaches. Debray TPA, Koffijberg H, Vergouwe Y, Moons KGM, Steyerberg EW, Stat Med 2012 31 23 Accepted for publication [doi:10.1002/sim.5412]