Centrifugal Pump and Roller Pump in Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Artificial Organs

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 668-676

  Saczkowski, Richard ^a   Maklin, Michelle ^a   Mesana, Thierry ^a   Boodhwani, Munir ^a   Ruel, Marc ^a  

^a ROYAL COLUMBIAN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cardiopulmonary bypass; Centrifugal pump; Meta analysis; Roller pump; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL HEART; BLOOD PRESSURE; CELLS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; ROLLERS (MACHINE COMPONENTS);

BLOOD LOSS; CARDIAC-SURGERY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; FIXED EFFECTS; LENGTH OF STAY; META-ANALYSIS; POST-OPERATIVE DAYS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROLLER PUMPS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

BLOOD;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CENTRIFUGAL PUMP; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUMP DESIGN; ROLLER PUMP; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84864821606     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2012.01497.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Jakob HG, Hafner G, Thelemann C, Stürer A, Prellwitz W, Oelert H. Routine extracorporeal circulation with a centrifugal or roller pump. ASAIO Trans 1991;37:M487-9.
2. Klein M, Dauben HP, Schulte HD, Gams E. Centrifugal pumping during routine open heart surgery improves clinical outcomes. Artif Organs 1998;22:326-36.
3. Triveldi U, Timberlake N, Bennywith O, Chambers D, Venn G, Newman S. The impact of centrifugal and roller pump in CABG on microemboli and neuropsychological outcomes. Perfusion 1997;12:67.
4. DeBois WJ, Brennan R, Wein E, Isom OW, Gold JP. Centrifugal pumping: the patient outcome benefits following coronary artery bypass surgery. J Extra Corpor Technol 1995;27:77-80.
5. Baker RA, Wilcox TW. Australian and New Zealand perfusion survey: equipment and monitoring. J Extra Corpor Technol 2006;38:220-9.
6. Salo M, Perttila J, Puikki K, etal. Proimflammatory mediator response in coronary bypass surgery using a centrifugal or a roller pump. J Extra Corpor Technol 1995;27:146-51.
7. Wahba A, Philip A, Bauer MF, Kaiser M, Aebert H, Birnbaum DE. The blood saving potential of vortex versus roller pump with and without aprotinin. Perfusion 1995;10:333-41.
8. Perttilä J, Salo M, Peltola O. Comparison of the effects of centrifugal versus roller pump on the immune response in open-heart surgery. Perfusion 1995;10:249-56.
9. Baufreton C, Intrator L, Jansen PG, etal. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass using roller or centrifugal pumps. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:972-7.
10. Hansbro SD, Sharpe DA, Catchpole R, etal. Haemolysis during cardiopulmonary bypass: an in vivo comparison of standard roller pumps, nonocclusive roller pumps and centrifugal pumps. Perfusion 1999;14:3-10.
11. Andersen KS, Nygreen EL, Grong K, Leirvaag B, Holmsen H. Comparison of the centrifugal and roller pump in elective coronary artery bypass surgery-a prospective, randomised study with special emphasis upon platelet activation. Scand Cardiovasc J 2003;37:356-62.
12. Valeri CR, MacGregor H, Ragno G, Healey N, Fonger J, Khuri SF. Effects of centrifugal and roller pumps on survival of autologous red cells in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Perfusion 2006;21:291-6.
13. Moen O, Fosse E, Dregelid E, etal. Centrifugal pump and heparin coating improves cardiopulmonary bypass biocompatibility. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1134-40.
14. Ashraf S, Butler J, Tian Y, etal. Inflammatory mediators in adults undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison of centrifugal and roller pumps. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:480-4.
15. Wheeldon D, Bethune D, Gill R. Vortex pumping for routine cardiac surgery: a comparative study. Perfusion 1990;5:135-43.
16. Keyser A, Hilker M, Diez C, Philipp A, Foltan M, Schmid C. Prospective randomized clinical study of arterial pumps used for routine on pump coronary bypass grafting. Artif Organs 2011;35:534-42.
17. Kon N, Stump D, Hammon J, etal. The effect of centrifugal and roller pumps, patient demographics and embolic load on neurobehavioural outcome following cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 1997;12:54.
18. Scott DA, Silbert BS, Doyle TJ, etal. Centrifugal versus roller head pumps for cardiopulmonary bypass: effect on early neuropsychologic outcomes after coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002;16:715-22.
19. Göbel C, Eilers R, Reul H, Schwindke P, Jörger M, Rau G. A new blood pump for cardiopulmonary bypass: the HiFlow centrifugal pump. Artif Organs 1997;21:841-5.
20. Yoshikai M, Hamada M, Takarabe K, Okazaki Y, Ito T. Clinical use of centrifugal pumps and the roller pump in open heart surgery: a comparative evaluation. Artif Organs 1996;20:704-6.
21. Nishida H, Yamaki F, Nakatani H, etal. Development of the Terumo Capiox centrifugal pump and its clinical application to open heart surgery: a comparative study with the roller pump. Artif Organs 1993;17:323-7.
22. Nishinaka T, Nishida H, Endo M, Miyagishima M, Ohtsuka G, Koyanagi H. Less blood damage in the impeller centrifugal pump: a comparative study with the roller pump in open heart surgery. Artif Organs 1996;20:707-10.
23. Nishinaka T, Nishida H, Endo M, Koyanagi H. Less platelet damage in the curved vane centrifugal pump: a comparative study with the roller pump in open heart surgery. Artif Organs 1994;18:687-90.
24. Berki T, Gurbuz A, Isik O, Akkaya H, Bayezid O, Yakut C. Cardiopulmonary bypass using centrifugal pump. Vasc Surg 1992;26:123-34.
25. Moen O, Fosse E, Braten J, etal. Differences in blood activation related to roller/centrifugal pumps and heparin coated/uncoated surfaces in a cardiopulmonary bypass model. Perfusion 1996;11:113-23.
26. Steines D, Westphal D, Göbel C, Reul H, Rau G. Platelet function and hemolysis in centrifugal pumps: in vitro investigations. Int J Artif Organs 1999;22:559-65.
27. Ninomiya J, Shoji T, Tanaka S, etal. Clinical evaluation of a new type of centrifugal pump. Artif Organs 1994;18:702-5.
28. Alamanni F, Parolari A, Zanobini M, etal. Centrifugal pump and reduction of neurological risk in adult cardiac surgery. J Extra Corpor Technol 2001;33:4-9.
29. Parolari A, Alamanni F, Naliato M, etal. Adult cardiac surgery outcomes: role of pump type. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:575-82.
30. Dickinson TA, Prichard J, Rieckens F. A comparison of benefits of roller pump versus constrained vortex pump in adult open-heart operations utilizing outcomes research. J Extra Corpor Technol 1994;26:108-13.
31. Linneweber J, Chow TW, Kawamura M, etal. In vitro comparison of blood pump induced platelet microaggregates between a centrifugal and roller pump during cardiopulmonary bypass. Int J Artif Organs 2002;25:549-55.
32. Lindholm L, Westerberg M, Bengtsson A, etal. A closed perfusion system with heparin coating and centrifugal pump improves cardiopulmonary bypass biocompatibility in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:2131-8.
33. Zirbel GM, Letson ME, Kauffman JN, etal. Hematologic derangements of cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison of two perfusion systems. J Extra Corpor Technol 1990;22:15-9.
34. Driessen JJ, Fransen G, Rondelez L, etal. Comparison of the standard roller pump and a pulsatile centrifugal pump for extracorporeal circulation during routine coronary artery bypass grafting. Perfusion 1991;6:303-11.
35. Remadi JP, Rakotoarivelo Z, Marticho P, etal. Prospective randomized study comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with the new mini-extracorporeal circulation Jostra System or with a standard cardiopulmonary bypass. Am Heart J 2006;151:198.e1-198.e7.
36. Klein M, Mahoney CB, Probst C, etal. Blood product use during routine open heart surgery: the impact of the centrifugal pump. Artif Organs 2001;25:300-5.
37. Morgan I, Codispoti M, Sanger K, etal. Superiority of centrifugal pump over roller pump in pediatric cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:526-32.
38. Jense E, Andresson S, Bengtsson A, etal. Influence of two different perfusion systems on inflammatory response in pediatric heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:919-25.
39. González C, Luna P, Molina J, etal. Hematological differences between the effects of roller vs. centrifugal pump. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex 1996;66:29-37.
40. Macey MG, McCarthy DA, Trivedi UR, etal. Neutrophil adhesion molecule expression during cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparative study of roller and centrifugal pumps. Perfusion 1997;12:293-301.
41. Ashraf S, Bhattacharya K, Zacharias S, etal. Serum S100 beta release after coronary artery bypass grafting: roller versus centrifugal pump. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1958-62.
42. Babin-Ebell J, Misoph M, Müllges W, etal. Reduced release of tissue factor by application of a centrifugal pump during cardiopulmonary bypass. Heart Vessels 1998;13:147-51.
43. Hyde JA, Riddington DW, Hutton P, etal. Prevention of remote organ injury in cardiopulmonary bypass: the impact of flow generation technique. Artif Organs 1997;21:825-9.
44. Mahoney C. Heparin bonded circuits: clinical outcomes and costs. Perfusion 1998;13:192-204.
45. Cross J. Economics of cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999;3:227.
46. Ferraris V, Ferraris S, Singh A. Operative outcomes and hospital cost. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:593.
47. Ferraris V, Ferraris S. Risk factors for postoperative morbidity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:731.
48. Lazar H, Fitzgerald C, Gross S, etal. The determinates of length of stay after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 1995;9:20-4.
49. Wesselink R, de Boer A, Morshuis W, etal. Cardio-pulmonary-bypass time has important independent influence on morbidity and mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:1141-5.
50. Hogue C, Gottesman R, Sterns J. Mechanisms of cerebral injury from cardiac surgery. Crit Care Clin 2008;24:83-93.
51. Selnes O, Grega M, Borowicz L. Cognitive outcomes three years after coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison of on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery and non-surgical controls. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:1201.
52. Warren O, Smith A, Alexiou C. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: part 1-mechanisms of pathogenesis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009;23:223-31.
53. Osborn JJ, Cohn K, Hait M, etal. Hemolysis during perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1962;43:459-64.
54. Salamas A, Hugo F, Heinrich D, etal. Deposition of terminal C5b-9 complement complexes on erythrocytes and leukocytes during cardiopulmonary bypass. N Engl J Med 1985;318:408-14.
55. Hiroyama T, Herlitz H, Jonsson O, etal. Deformability and electrolyte changes of erythrocytes in connection with open heart surgery. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;20:253-4.
56. Rawn DJ, Harris HK, Riley JB, etal. An under-occluded roller pump is less hemolytic than a centrifugal pump. J Extra Corpor Technol 1997;29:15-8.
57. Tamari Y, Lee-Sensiba K, Leonard EF, etal. The effects of pressure and flow on hemolysis caused by bio-Medicus centrifugal pumps and roller pumps: guidelines for choosing a blood pump. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:997-1007.
58. Head LR, Coenen JP, Angola E, etal. Operation of the roller pump for extracorporeal circulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1958;35:747-50.
59. Ferraris V, Ferraris SP, Saha SP, etal. Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgery and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:S27-86.
60. Sedrakyan A, Treasure T, Elefteriadies JA. Affect of aprotinin on clinical outcomes in coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:442-8.
61. Parolari A, Antona C, Gerometta P, etal. The effect of "high dose" aprotinin and other factors on bleeding and revisions for bleeding in adult coronary and valve operations: an analysis of 2190 patients during a five-year period (1987-1991). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995;5:77-82.
62. Guerrio C, Cairns J, Perel P, etal. Cost-effectiveness analysis of administering tranexamic acid to bleeding trauma patients using evidence from the CRASH-2 trial. PLoS ONE 2011;6.