Australian and New Zealand perfusion survey: Equipment and monitoring

Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 220-229

  Baker, Robert A ^a,c   Willcox, Timothy W ^b  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AUCKLAND CITY HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^c FLINDERS MEDICAL CENTRE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cardiopulmonary bypass; Questionnaire; Survey

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; E-MAIL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FILTER; HEALTH SURVEY; HEART SURGERY; HEMATOCRIT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROBUBBLE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEW ZEALAND; OXYGEN SATURATION; OXYGENATOR; PERFUSION; QUESTIONNAIRE; APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; INSTRUMENTATION; MONITORING; STANDARD; TEMPERATURE;

ADULT; AUSTRALIA; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NEW ZEALAND; PERFUSION; QUESTIONNAIRES; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 39049194134     PISSN: 00221058     EISSN: 29698960     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/ject/200638220     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Wajon PR, Walsh RG, Symons NLP. A survey of cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion practices in Australia in 1992. Anaesth Intens Care. 1993;21:814-21.
2. Jenkins OF, Morris M, Simpson JM. Australasian perfusion incident survey. Perfusion. 1997;12:279-88.
3. Silvay G, Ammar T, Reich DL, Vela-Cantos F, Joffe D, Ergin AM. Cardiopulmonary bypass for adult patients: A survey of equipment and techniques. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1995;9:420-4.
4. Stammers AH, Mejak BL, Rauch ED, Vang SN, Viessman TW. Factors affecting perfusionists' decisions on equipment utilization: Results of a United States survey. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:4-10.
5. Lilley A. The selection of priming fluids for cardiopulmonary bypass in the UK and Ireland. Perfusion. 2002;17:315-20.
6. Cecere G, Groom R, Forest R, Quinn R, Morton J. A 10-year review of pediatric perfusion practice in North America. Perfusion. 2002;17:83-9.
7. Charriere JM, Durand C, Mandon N, et al. French national survey of the use of monitoring devices during cardiopulmonary bypass in 2001. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2003;22:414-20.
8. Groom RC, Froebe S, Martin J, et al. Update on pediatric perfusion practice in North America: 2005 Survey. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:343-50.
9. Australasian Society of Cardiovascular Perfusionists Inc. Standards of practice in clinical perfusion within Australasia. Available at www.perfusion.com.au. Accessed March 23, 2006.
10. Cockroft SJ. Use of monitoring devices during anesthesia for cardiac surgery: A survey of practices at public hospitals within the United Kingdom and Ireland. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1994;8:382-5.
11. Feneck RO. Standards of monitoring. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1994;8:379-91.
12. Recommendations for Standards of Monitoring and Alarms during Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Available at www.sopgbi.org, www.acta.org.uk, and www.scts.org. Accessed March 23, 2006.
13. Grocott HP, Newman MF, Croughwell ND, White WD, Lowry E, Reves JG. Continuous jugular venous versus nasopharyngeal temperature monitoring during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9:312-6.
14. Johnson RI, Fox MA, Grayson A, Jackson M, Fabri BM. Should we rely on nasopharyngeal temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass? Perfusion. 2002;17:145-51.
15. Marino M, Cheng W, Romagnoli A, Walding D, Nussmeier N. Temperature bias: Jugular bulb venous temperature versus conventional sites. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1792.
16. Shann KG, Likosky DS, Murkin JM, Baker RA, Baribeau YR, DeFoe GR, Dickinson TA, Gardner TJ, Grocott HP, O'Connor GT, Rosinski DJ, Selke FW, Willcox TW. An evidence-based approach to improving the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults. A focus on neurological injury, glycemic control, hemodilution and the inflammatory response. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (in press).