Tutor Spotter: Proposing a Feature Set and Evaluating It in a Robotic System

International Journal of Social Robotics

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 131-146

  Lohan, Katrin S ^a   Rohlfing, Katharina J ^a   Pitsch, Karola ^a   Saunders, Joe ^a   Lehmann, Hagen ^a   Nehaniv, Chrystopher L ^a   Fischer, Kerstin ^a   Wrede, Britta ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contingency; Feedback; Human robot interaction; Joint attention; Parent child interaction; Tutoring; Tutoring behavior

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; FEEDBACK; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; MAMMALS; OBJECT DETECTION; SCAFFOLDS; SOCIAL ROBOTS;

CONTINGENCY; JOINT ATTENTION; PARENT-CHILD INTERACTIONS; TUTORING; TUTORING BEHAVIOR;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 84864805735     PISSN: 18754791     EISSN: 18754805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-011-0125-8     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Asada M, Hosoda K, Kuniyoshi Y, Ishiguro H, Inui T, Yoshikawa Y, Ogino M, Yoshida C (2009) Cognitive developmental robotics: A survey. IEEE Trans Auton Ment Dev 1(1): 12-34.
2. Bavelas J, Coates L, Johnson T (2002) Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. J Commun 52(3): 566-580.
3. Bigelow A, Birch S (1999) The effects of contingency in previous interactions on infants' preference for social partners. Infant Behav Dev 22(3): 367-382.
4. Brand R, Baldwin D, Ashburn L (2002) Evidence for 'motionese': modifications in mothers' infant-directed action. Dev Sci 5(1): 72-83.
5. Brugman H, Russel A (2004) Annotating multimedia/multi-modal resources with elan. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on language resources and evaluation. Citeseer, pp 2065-2068.
6. Cangelosi A, Metta G, Sagerer G, Nolfi S, Nehaniv C, Fischer K, Tani J, Belpaeme T, Sandini G, Nori F et al (2009) Integration of action and language knowledge: A roadmap for developmental robotics. IEEE Trans Auton Ment Dev 99: 1.
7. Clark H, Brennan S (1991) Grounding in communication.
8. Csibra G (2010) Recognizing communicative intentions in infancy. Mind Lang 25(2): 141-168.
9. Csibra G, Gergely G (2005) Social learning and social cognition: The case for pedagogy. Processes of change in brain and cognitive development. Atten Perform 21.
10. Csibra G, Gergely G (2009) Natural pedagogy. Trends Cogn Sci 13(4): 148-153.
11. Eliëns A Object-oriented software development.
12. Estigarribia B, Clark E (2007) Getting and maintaining attention in talk to young children. J Child Lang 34(04): 799-814.
13. Fasel I, Butko N, Movellan J (2007) Modeling the embodiment of early social development and social interaction: Learning about human faces during the first six minutes of life. In: Society for Research in Child Development biennial meeting.
14. Fischer K (2011) Interpersonal variation in understanding robots as social actors. In: Proceedings of HRI'11, pp 53-60.
15. Fogel A, Garvey A (2007) Alive communication. Infant Behav Dev 30(2): 251-257.
16. Gergely G, Watson J (1996) The social biofeedback theory of parental affect-mirroring: The development of emotional self-awareness and self-control in inf. Int J Psycho-Anal 77: 1181-1212.
17. Gergely G, Watson J (1999) Early socio-emotional development: Contingency perception and the social-biofeedback model. Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life, pp 101-136.
18. Gogate L, Bahrick L, Watson J (2000) A study of multimodal motherese: The role of temporal synchrony between verbal labels and gestures. Child Dev 71(4): 878-894.
19. Kato H (1999) Artoolkit. http://www. hitl. washington. edu/artoolkit/.
20. Kaye K (1982) The mental and social life of babies: How parents create persons. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
21. Keller H, Lohaus A, Völker S, Cappenberg M, Chasiotis A (1999) Temporal contingency as an independent component of parenting behavior. Child Dev 70(2): 474-485.
22. Kindermann T (1993) Natural peer groups as contexts for individual development: The case of children's motivation in school. Dev Psychol 29(6): 970.
23. Lee J, Kiser J, Bobick A, Thomaz A (2011) Vision-based contingency detection. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human-robot interaction. ACM, New York, pp 297-304.
24. Legerstee M (2005) Infants' sense of people: precursors to a theory of mind. Cambridge Univ Pr, Cambridge.
25. Lohan KS, Gieselmann S, Vollmer AL, Rohlfing K, Wrede B (2010) Does embodiment effect tutoring behavior?.
26. Lohse M, Hanheide M, Pitsch K, Rohlfing K, Sagerer G (2009) Improving HRI design by applying systemic interaction analysis (SINA). Interact Stud 10(3): 298-323.
27. Machines S (2009) faceapi.
28. Markova G, Legerstee M (2006) Contingency, imitation, and affect sharing: Foundations of infants' social awareness. Dev Psychol 42(1): 132.
29. Matatyaho D, Gogate L (2008) Type of maternal object motion during synchronous naming predicts preverbal infants' learning of word-object relations. Infancy 13(2): 172-184.
30. Metta G, Fitzpatrick P, Natale L (2006) Yarp: yet another robot platform. Int J Adv Robotics Syst 3(1): 43-48.
31. Mondloch C, Lewis T, Budreau D, Maurer D, Dannemiller J, Stephens B, Kleiner-Gathercoal K (1999) Face perception during early infancy. Psychol Sci 10(5): 419.
32. Movellan J (2005) An infomax controller for real time detection of social contingency.
33. Muir D, Lee K (2003) The still-face effect: Methodological issues and new applications. Infancy 4(4): 483-491.
34. Nagai Y (2005) Joint attention development in infant-like robot based on head movement imitation. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on imitation in animals and artifacts, pp 87-96.
35. Nehaniv C, Dautenhahn K (2001) Like me?-measures of correspondence and imitation. Cybern Syst 32(1): 11-51.
36. Okanda M, Itakura S (2006) Development of contingency: How infants become sensitive to contingency? In: Proc of the XVth biennial international conference on infant studies, Kyoto, Japan.
37. Pascalis O, Kelly D (2009) The origins of face processing in humans: Phylogeny and ontogeny. Perspectives Psychol Sci 4(2): 200.
38. Pitsch K, Koch B (2010) How infants perceive the toy robot pleo. An exploratory case study on infant-robot-interaction.
39. Pitsch K, Vollmer A, Fritsch J, Wrede B, Rohlfing K, Sagerer G (2009) On the loop of action modification and the recipient's gaze in adult-child interaction. In: Gesture and speech in interaction, Poznan, Poland.
40. Regan D, Beverley K (1978) Looming detectors in the human visual pathway. Vis Res 18(4): 415-421.
41. Rohlfing K, Fritsch J, Wrede B, Jungmann T (2006) How can multimodal cues from child-directed interaction reduce learning complexity in robots? Adv Robot 20(10): 1183-1199.
42. Schegloff E (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge Univ Pr, Cambridge.
43. Senju A, Csibra G (2008) Gaze following in human infants depends on communicative signals. Curr Biol 18(9): 668-671.
44. Shotton J, Fitzgibbon A, Cook M, Sharp T, Finocchio M, Moore R, Kipman A, Blake A Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images.
45. Slater A, Quinn P, Kelly D, Lee K, Longmore C, McDonald P, Pascalis O (2010) The shaping of the face space in early infancy: Becoming a native face processor. Child Dev Perspectives 4(3): 205-211.
46. Striano T, Henning A, Stahl D (2005) Sensitivity to social contingencies between 1 and 3 months of age. Dev Sci 8(6): 509-518.
47. Sumioka H, Yoshikawa Y, Asada M (2008) Development of joint attention related actions based on reproducing interaction contingency. In: 7th IEEE international conference on development and learning, 2008, ICDL 2008, pp 256-261.
48. Sumioka H, Yoshikawa Y, Asada M (2010) Reproducing interaction contingency toward open-ended development of social actions: Case study on joint attention. IEEE Trans Auton Ment Dev 2(1): 40-50.
49. Tanaka F, Cicourel A, Movellan J (2007) Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proc Nat Acad Sci 104(46): 17, 954.
50. Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behav Brain Sci 28(05): 675-691.
51. Tomasello M, Farrar M (1986) Joint attention and early language. Child Dev 57(6): 1454-1463.
52. Tronick E (1978) The structure of face-to-face interaction and its developmental functions. Sign Lang Stud.
53. Vollmer AL, Pitsch K, Lohan KS, Fritsch J, Rohlfing K, Wrede B (2010) Developing feedback: How children of different age contribute to an interaction with adults. In: International conference on development and learning.
54. Watson J (1985) Contingency perception in early social development. In: Social perception in infants, pp 157-176.
55. Wrede B, Rohlfing K, Hanheide M, Sagerer G (2009) Towards learning by interacting. In: Creating brain-like intelligence: from basic principles to complex intelligent systems, pp 139-150.
56. Wrede S, Hanheide M, Bauckhage C, Sagerer G (2004) An active memory as a model for information fusion. In: Proc int conf on information fusion, Citeseer, vol 1, pp 198-205.
57. Yamazaki A, Yamazaki K, Kuno Y, Burdelski M, Kawashima M, Kuzuoka H (2008) Precision timing in human-robot interaction: coordination of head movement and utterance. In: Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 131-140.
58. Zukow-Goldring P, Arbib M (2007) Affordances, effectivities, and assisted imitation: Caregivers and the directing of attention. Neurocomputing 70(13-15): 2181-2193.