Like me?- measures of correspondence and imitation

Cybernetics and Systems

Volumn 32, Issue 1-2, 2001, Pages 11-51

  Nehaniv, Chrystopher L ^a   Dautenhahn, Kerstin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012876250     PISSN: 01969722     EISSN: 10876553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/019697201300001803     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Billard, A. 1999. DRAMA, a connectionist modelfor robot learning: Experiments on grounding communication through imitation in autonomous robots. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh
2. Billard, A., and K. Dautenhahn. 1997. Grounding communication in situated, social robots. In Proc. “Towards Intelligent Mobile Robots” TIMR UK 97. Technical Report Series of the Department of Computer Science, Manchester University, Manchester, UK.
3. Billard, A., and K. Dautenhahn. 1998. Grounding communication in autonomous robots: An experimental study. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, SpecialIssue on “Scientific Methods in Mobile Robotics” 24 1/2: 71-81.
4. Billard, A., and G. Hayes. 1997. Learning to communicate through imitation in autonomous robots. In Proceedings of Seventh International Conferences on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN97), eds. W. Gerstner et al., 763-768. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Breazeal, C. 1999. Imitation as social exchange between humans and robots. In Proceedings of the AISB’99 Symposium on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts, eds. K. Dautenhahn and C. L. Nehaniv, 96-104. Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour, Edinburgh, Scotland.
6. Breazeal, C. 2000. Sociable machines: Expressive social exchange between humans and robots. Sc.D. dissertation, Engineering and Computer Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
7. Breazeal, C., and B. Scassellati. Issues in building robots that imitate people. In Imitation in animals and artifacts, eds. K. Dautenhahn and C. L. Nehaniv. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (in press).
8. Brooks, R. 1996. Behavior-based humanoid robotics. In Proc. 1996 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 96, 1-8.
9. Brooks, R. A., C. Breazeal, M. Marjanovic, B. Scassellati, and M. M. Williamson. 1999. The Cog project: Building a humanoid robot. In Computation for metaphors, analogy, and agents, ed. C. L. Nehaniv, 53-87. Springer LNAI, 1562.
10. Brooks, R. A., and L. A. Stein. 1994. Building brains for bodies. Autonomous Robots 1:7-25.
11. Byrne, R. W. 1999. Imitation without intentionality: Using string parsing to copy the organization of behavior. Anim. Cogn. 2:63-72.
12. Byrne, R. W., and A. E. Russon. 1997. Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Brain and Behavioral Sciences. 21:667-709.
13. Call, J., and M. Carpenter. Three sources of social learning. In Imitation in animals and artifacts, eds. K. Dautenhahn and C. L. Nehaniv, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (in press).
14. Crutchfield, J. P. 1994. Observing complexity and the complexity of observation. In Inside versus outside, H. Atmanspacher, ed., 234-272. New York: Springer-Verlag.
15. Cypher, A. 1993. Watch what I do: Programming by demonstration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Dautenhahn, K. 1994. Trying to imitate-a step towards releasing robots from social isolation. In Proc. From Perception to Action Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland, September 7-9, eds. P. Gaussier and J.-D. Nicould. 290-301. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Computer Society Press.
17. Dautenhahn, K. 1995. Getting to know each other-artificial social intelligence for autonomous robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 16:333-356.
18. Dautenhahn, K. 1997a. Biologically inspired robotic experiments on interaction and dynamic agent-environment couplings. In Proc. Workshop SOAVE’97, Selbstorganization von Adaptivem Verhalten, Ilmenau, September, 14-24.
19. Dautenhahn, K. 1997b. I could be you-the phenomenological dimension of social understanding. Cybernetics and Systems 25(8):417-453.
20. Dautenhahn, K. 1999. Embodiment and interaction in socially intelligent life-like agents. In Computation for metaphors, analogy and agents, C. L. Nehaniv, ed., 105-147. Springer LNAI, 1562.
21. Dautenhahn, K. and I. Werry. Issues of robot-human interaction dynamics in the rehabilitation of children with autism. In Proc. From Animals to Animats: The Sixth International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (SAB2000), 11-15 September, Paris, France, J. A. Meyer, A. Berthoz, D. Floreano, H. Roitblat and S. W. Wilson, eds., 519-528. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Demiris, J., and G. Hayes. 1997. Do robots ape? In Socially Intelligent Agents: Papers of the AAAI Fall Symposium, Cambridge, MA, November, 28-30. American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
23. Eilenberg, S. 1976. Automata, languages andmachines, B. New York: Academic Press.
24. Gaussier, P., S. Moga, J. P. Banquet, andM. Quoy. 1998. From perception-action loops to imitation processes: A bottom-up approach of learning by imitation. Applied Artificial Intelligence: An International Journal, SpecialIssue on “Socially Intelligent Agents,” 12(7-8):701-729.
25. Gibson, J. J. 1977. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
26. Hayes, G., and J. Demiris. 1994. A robot controller using learning by imitation. In Proc. 2nd International Symposium on Intelligent Robotic Systems, A. Borkowski and J. L. Crowley, eds., 198-204. Grenoble, France, LIFTA-IMAG.
27. Herman, L. M. Vocal, social, and self imitation by bottlenosed dolphins. In Imitation in animals and artifacts, K. Dautenhahn and C. L. Nehaniv, eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (in press).
28. Heyes, C. M., and B. G. Galef Jr., eds. 1996. Social learning in animals: The roots of culture. New York: Academic Press.
29. Heyes, C. M., and E. Ray. 2000. What is the significance of imitation in animals? Advances in the Study of Behaviour 29:215-245.
30. Hinde, R. A., and J. Fisher. 1951. Further observations on the opening of milk bottles by birds. Brit. Birds 44:393-396.
31. Jones, J. L., and A. M. Flynn. 1993. Mobile robots: Inspiration to implementation. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters Ltd.
32. Lieberman, H. ed. 2000. Special section on “Programming by Example.” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 43(3):72-114.
33. McNeill Alexander, R. 1992. Exploring biomechanics: Animals in motion. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Company.
34. Mitchell, R. W. 1987. A comparative-developmental approach to understanding imitation. Perspectives in Ethology 7:183-215.
35. Nehaniv, C. L. 1996. From relation to emulation: The covering lemma for transformation semigroups. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 107:75-87.
36. Nehaniv, C. L. ed. 1999a. Computation for metaphors, analogy, and agents. Springer LNAI, 1562.
37. Nehaniv, C. L. 1999b. Meaning for observers and agents. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control: Intelligent Systems & Semiotics, 435-440. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Cambridge, MA.
38. Nehaniv, C., and K. Dautenhahn. 1998a. Embodiment and memories-algebras of time and history for autobiographic agents. In Cybernetics and Systems Research 98, Proc. 14th European Workshop on Cybernetics and Systems Research-14-17 April, Vienna, Austria, Volume 2, 651-656. Austrian Society for Cybernetics Studies.
39. Nehaniv, C., and K. Dautenhahn. 1998b. Semigroup expansions for autobiographic agents. in Proceedings of the First Symposium on Algebra, Languages and Computation, University of Aizu, Japan, 30 October-1 November, 77-84. Osaka University.
40. Norman, D. A. 1992. The psychology of everyday things. London: Harper Collins.
41. Sammut, C., S. Hurst, D. Kedzier, and D. Michie. 1992. Learning to fly. In Proc. Ninth International Conference on Machine Learning, Aberdeen, Scotland, 385-393, Morgan Kaufman.
42. Thorndike, E. L. 1898. Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative process in animals. Psychol. Rev. Monogr. 2:551-553.
43. Tomasello, M. 1990. Cultural transmission in the tool use and communicatory signalling of chimpanzees? In “Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes: Comparative developmental perspectives, S. Parker and K. Gibson. London: Cambridge University Press.
44. Tomasello, M., and J. Call. 1997. Primate cognition. Oxford University Press.
45. Visalberghi, E., and D. Fragaszy. “Do monkeys ape?” Ten years after. In Imitation in animals and artifacts, eds. K. Dautenhahn and C. L. Nehaniv. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (in press).
46. Whiten, A. Imitation of sequential and hierarchical structure in action: Experimental studies with children and chimpanzees. In Proceedings of the AISB’99 Symposium on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts, eds. K. Dautenhahn and C. L. Nehaniv, 38-46. Society for the Study of Artihcial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour. Also in: Imitation in animals and artifacts, eds. K. Dautenhahn and C. L. Nehaniv. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (in press).
47. Zentall, T. R. 1996. An analysis of imitative learning in animals. In Social learning in animals: The roots of culture, eds. C. M. Heyes and B. G. Galef Jr., 221-243. New York: Academic Press.
48. Zentall, T. R. 2001. Imitation and other forms of social learning in animals. Evidence, function, and mechanisms. Cybernetics and Systems, SpecialIssue on Imitation in Natural and Artihcial Systems. In this issue.