Differences between willingness to pay and willingness to accept for visits by a family physician: A contingent valuation study

BMC Public Health

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Martín Fernndez, Jess ^a   Del Cura Gonzlez, Ma Isabel ^b,c   Gámez Gascán, Toms ^d,e   Oliva Moreno, Juan ^f,g   Domínguez Bidagor, Julia ^h   Beamud Lagos, Milagros ^b,e   Pérez Rivas, Francisco Javier ^e,h  

^a San Martín de Valdeiglesias Health Center   (Spain)

^b Research Unit   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^d Puerta Bonita II Health Center   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^g CIBER EPIDEMIOLOGÍA Y SALUD PÚBLICA CIBERESP   (Spain)

^h Madrid Health Service   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; COST; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIAL CLASS; SPAIN; URBAN POPULATION; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COST SHARING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; FINANCING, PERSONAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OFFICE VISITS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIAL CLASS; SPAIN; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 84864763946     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-236     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. The value of health care: a matter of discussion in Germany. F Porzsolt M Ackermann V Amelung, BMC Health Serv Res 2007 7 1 10.1186/1472-6963-7-1 17199886
2. Aggregation rules for cost-benefit analysis: a health economics perspective. J Borghi, Health Econ 2008 17 863 875 10.1002/hec.1304 17992709
3. Assessing the value of a new pharmaceutical. A feasibility study of contingent valuation in managed care. BJ O'Brien R Goeree A Gafni GW Torrance MV Pauly H Erder J Rusthoven J Weeks M Cahill B LaMont, Med Care 1998 36 370 384 10.1097/00005650-199803000-00013 9520961
4. Effects of study design characteristics on the WTA-WTP disparity: A meta analytical framework. S Sayman A Onculer, Journal of Economic Psychology 2005 26 289 312 10.1016/j.joep.2004.07.002 (Pubitemid 40190050)
5. The economic value of informal care: a study of informal caregivers' and patients' willingness to pay and willingness to accept for informal care. B Van den Berg H Bleichrodt L Eeckhoudt, Health Econ 2005 14 363 976 10.1002/hec.980 15744739
6. WTP and WTA: do people think differently? DK Whynes TH Sach, Soc Sci Med 2007 65 946 957 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.014 17499410
7. Willingness to Accept versus Willingness to Pay in a Discrete Choice Experiment. JP Grutters AG Kessels CD Dirksen D van Helvoort-Postulart LJ Anteunis MA Joore, Value Health 2008 11 1110 9 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00340.x 18489505
8. A Review of WTA/WTP Studies. JK Horowitz KE McConnell, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2002 44 426 447 10.1006/jeem.2001.1215 (Pubitemid 35235477)
9. Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ? WM Hanemann, Am Econ Rev 1991 81 635 647
10. Resolving differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingnes to Accept. JF Shogren SY Shin DJ Haynes JB Kliebenstein, Am Econ Rev 1994 84 255 270
11. Researching Preferences, Valuation and Hypothetical Bias. RM Guzman CHD Kolstad, Environmental and Resource Economics 2007 37 465 487 10.1007/s10640-006-9034-y (Pubitemid 46855394)
12. Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice - a Reference- Dependent Model. Y Tversky D Kahneman, Q J Econ 1991 106 1039 1061 10.2307/2937956
13. A new explanation for the WTP/WTA disparity. J Zhao CL Kling, Econ Lett 2001 73 293 300 10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00511-0
14. Is there a kink in consumers' threshold value for cost-effectiveness in health care? BJ O'Brien K Gertsen AR Willan LA Faulkner, Health Econ 2002 11 175 180 10.1002/hec.655 11921315
15. Why cost-effectiveness should trump (clinical) efectiveness: the ethical economics of the SouthWest quadrant. J Dowie, Health Econ 2004 13 453 459 10.1002/hec.861 15127425
16. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and a reluctance to lose. JL Severens DE Brunenberg EA Fenwick B O'Brien MA Joore, Pharmacoeconomics 2005 23 1207 1214 10.2165/00019053-200523120-00005 16336015
17. [Factors conditioning primary care services utilization. Empirical evidence and methodological inconsistencies]. M Sez, Gac Sanit 2003 17 412 419 10.1157/13053655 14599425
18. [Public healthcare coverage versus double healthcare coverage: what are the differences?]. J Fusté E Séculi P Brugulat A Medina S Junc Gac Sanit 2005 19 15 21 10.1157/13071812 15745664
19. Evaluacián de la satisfaccián de los usuarios de los Servicios de la Asistencia Sanitaria Pblica de la Comunidad de Madrid. Atencián Primaria. Servicio Madrilẽo de Salud. Direccián General de Atencián al Paciente, http://www.madrid.org/cs/Satellite?c=CM- InfPractica-FA&cid=1142537203010&idConsejeria=1109266187266& idListConsj=1109265444710&idOrganismo=1109266228174&language= es&pagename=ComunidadMadrid%2FEstructura&sm=1109266100977
20. Impoverishment and patients' "willingness" and "ability" to pay for improving the quality of health care in Palestine: an assessment using the contingent valuation method. A Mataria R Giacaman R Khatib JP Moatti, Health Policy 2006 75 312 328 10.1016/j.healthpol. 2005.03.014 15869821
21. Perception of the economic value of primary care services: A willingness to pay study. J Martín-Fernndez T Gámez-Gascán J Oliva-Moreno MI Del Cura-Gonzlez J Domínguez-Bidagor M Beamud-Lagos T Sanz-Cuesta, Health Policy 2010 94 266 272 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.001 19945763
22. A patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in primary care: development and psychometric evaluation. CM Van der Feltz-Cornelis P Van Oppen HW Van Marwijk E De Beurs R Van Dyck, Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2004 26 115 120 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2003.08.010 15038928
23. [Proposal of an indica tor of "social class" based on the occupation]. A Domingo Salvany J Marcos Alonso, Gac Sanit 1989 3 320 326 2498222
24. Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Standard Errors in the Linear Regression Model. JS Long LH Ervin, The American Statistician 2000 54 217 224 10.2307/2685594
25. The Role of 'Property Rights' in Determining Economic Values for Environmental Costs and Benefits. D Pearce, Report to The Environment Agency. Bristol December 2002 http://www.environment-agency.info/static/documents/ Research/wtawtp-pearce-1485692.pdf
26. Report of the NOAA Panel of Contingent Valuation. K Arrow R Solow PR Portney EE Leamer R Radner H Schuman, Federal Register 1993 58 4601 4614
27. Measuring the value of time for methadone maintenance clients: willingness to pay, willingness to accept, and the wage rate. NN Borisova AC Goodman, Health Econ 2003 12 323 334 10.1002/hec.738 12652518
28. Informe 2007 del estado de salud de la poblacián de la Comunidad de Madrid. Direccián General de Salud Pblica y Alimentacián, http://www.madrid.org/cs/Satellite?pagename=PortalSalud/Page/PTSA-home
29. The usefulness of area-based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in health in Southern Europe. F Domínguez-Berján C Borrell M Rodríguez-Sanz V Pastor, Eur J Public Health 2006 16 54 61 10.1093/eurpub/cki069 16093303
30. Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies? JA List, Q J Econ 2003 118 47 71
31. Individual-Level Loss Aversion in Riskless and Risky Choices. S Gaechter EJ Johnson A Herrmann, IZA Discussion Paper No. 2961 http://ssrn.com/abstract= 1010597
32. Contingent valuation in health care: Does it matter how the 'good' is described? RD Smith, Health Econ 2008 17 607 617 10.1002/hec.1280 17764076
33. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. M Ryan V Watson, Health Econ 2009 18 389 401 10.1002/hec.1364 18677721
34. Willingness to pay for social health insurance among informal sector workers in Wuhan, China: a contingent valuation study. T Bärnighausen Y Liu X Zhang R Sauerborn, BMC Health Serv Res 2007 7 114 10.1186/1472-6963-7-114 17659084
35. Willingness to pay for preventive travel health measures among Hong Kong Chinese residents. R Yeung AS Abdullah SM McGhee AJ Hedley, J Travel Med 2005 12 66 71 15996450