A patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in primary care: Development and psychometric evaluation

General Hospital Psychiatry

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 115-120

  Van Der Feltz Cornelis, Christina M ^a   Van Oppen, Patricia ^a   Van Marwijk, Harm W J ^b   De Beurs, Edwin ^c   Van Dyck, Richard ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Helping alliance; Patient doctor relationship; Primary care; Questionnaire; Validation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EPILEPSY; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSICIAN; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SYMPTOM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PILOT PROJECTS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 1642264110     PISSN: 01638343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2003.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Mathers N.J., Gask L. Surviving the 'heartsink' experience. Fam Pract. 12:(2):1995;176-183.
2. O'Dowd T.C. Five years of 'heartsink' patients in general practice. BMJ. 6647:1988;528-530.
3. Hahn S.R., Thompson K.S., Wills T.A., Stern V., Budner N.S. The difficult doctor-patient relationship somatisation, personality and psychopathology. J Clin Epid. 47:(6):1994;647-657.
4. Wiefferink C.H., De Best-Waldhober M., Mellenbergh G.J. Moeilijke patienten in de huisartspraktijk de validering van de Nederlandse versie van de DDPRQ (Difficult patients in primary care: validation of the Dutch version of the DDPRQ). Tijdschr Soc Gez. 76:1998;298-304.
5. Gerrard T.J., Riddell J.D. Difficult patients black holes and secrets. BMJ. 6647:1988;530-532.
6. Groves J.E. Taking care of the hateful patient. N Engl J Med. 16:1978;883-887.
7. Jackson J.L., Kroenke K. Difficult patient encounters in the ambulatory clinic clinical predictors and outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 159:(10):1999;1069- 1075.
8. Hahn S.R., Kroenke K., Spitzer R.L., Brody D., Williams J.B., Linzer M., deGruy F.V. The difficult patient prevalence, psychopathology, and functional impairment. J Gen Intern Med. 11:(1):1996;1-8.
9. Van der Feltz-Cornelis C.M., Wijkel D., Verhaak P.F.M., Collijn D.H., Huyse F.J., Dyck van R. Psychiatric consultation for somatizing patients in the family practice setting a feasibility study. Int J Psychiatry Med. 26:(2):1996;223-239.
10. Van der Feltz-Cornelis C.M. Psychiatric consultation for patients with somatoform disorder in general practice. 2002;Dissertation Free Universital Medical Center, Amsterdam.
11. Bensing J.M. Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. An observation study into affective and instrumental behaviour in general practice. Academic dissertation. 1991;NIVEL, Utrecht.
12. Bensing J.M. Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. Soc Sci Med. 32:1991;1301-1310.
13. Van Dulmen A.M., Verhaak P.F.M., Bilo H.J. Shifts in doctor-patient communication during a series of outpatient consultations in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Pat Educ Couns. 30:(3):1997;227-237.
14. Gore J., Ogden J. Developing, validating and consolidating the doctor-patient relationship the patients' views of a dynamic process. Br J Gen Pract. 432:1998;1391-1394.
15. Inui T.S., Carter W.B., Kukull W.A., Haigh V.H. Outcome-based doctor-patient interaction analysis I. Comparison of techniques. Med Care. 20:(6):1982;535-549.
16. Bensing J.M., Dronkers J. Instrumental and affective aspects of physician behaviour. Med Care. 4:1992;283-298.
17. Lerman C.E., Brody D.S., Caputo G.C., Smith D.G., Lazaro C.G., Wolfson H.G. Patients' Perceived Involvement in Care Scale relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 5:(1):1990;29-33.
18. Baker R. Development of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 341:1990;487-490.
19. Poulton B.C. Use of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire to examine patients' satisfaction with general practitioners and community nurses reliability, replicability and discriminant validity. Br J Gen Pract. 402:1996;26-31.
20. Steven I.D., Thomas S.A., Eckerman E., Browning C., Dickens E. A patient determined general practice satisfaction questionnaire. Austr Family Physician. 28:(4):1999;342-348.
21. Rubin H.R., Gandek B., Rogers W.H., Kosinski M., McHorney C.A., Ware J.E. Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 270:1993;835-840.
22. Alexander L.B., Luborsky L., Greenberg L.S., Pinsof W.M. The Penn Helping Alliance Scales. Greenberg L., Pinsof W. The Psychotherapeutic Process A Research Handbook. 1986;325-366 The Guilford Press, New York.
23. Horvath A., Gaston L., Luborsky L. The therapeutic Allience and its measures. Miller N.E., Barber J.P., Docherty J.P. Psychoynamic Treatment Research A Handbook for Clinical Practice. 1993;247-273 Basic Books, New York.
24. Van der Linden MHM. De verstandhouding tussen cliënt en therapeut: een empirisch onderzoek naar de kwaliteit van de therapeutische werkrelatie en effect bij psychodynamische psychotherapie. Academisch proefschrift, Universiteit van Amsterdam. (The relationship between therapist and client: an empirical investigation of the quality of the therapeutic relationship and the effect of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Academic dissertation.), 1994
25. th ed:2001;Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights.
26. rd ed:1994;McGraw-Hill, New York.
27. Poulton B.C. Use of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire to examine patients' satisfaction with general practitioners and community nurses reliability, replicability and discriminant validity. Br J Gen Pract. 402:1996;26-31.
28. Goodger B., Byles J., Higganbotham N., Mishra G. Assessment of a short scale to measure social support among older people. Austr NZ J Publ Health. 23:(3):1999;260-265.