Probation officers' Perceptions of Youths' Risk of reoffending and use of risk assessment in case management

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 487-505

  Perrault, Rachael T ^a   Paiva Salisbury, Melissa ^b   Vincent, Gina M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CASE MANAGEMENT; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLICE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CASE MANAGEMENT; CHILD; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLICE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84864755624     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: 10990798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2015     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ægisdorrie, S., White, M. J., Spengler, P. M., Maugherman, A. S., Anderson, L. A., Cook, R. A., ... Rush, J. D. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 341-382. DOI: 10.1177/0011000005285875
2. Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct 4th ed. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
3. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39-55. DOI:10.1037/a0018362
4. Andrews, D. A., & Dowden, C. (2006). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50, 88-100. DOI:10.1177/0306624X05282556
5. Arkes, H. R. (1981). Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 323-330. Retrieved from
6. Aspel, A. D., Willis, W. G., & Faust, D. (1998). School psychologists' diagnostic decision-making processes: Objective-subjective discrepancies. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 137-149. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4405(98)00002-8
7. Bonta, J., Bogue, B., Crowley, M., & Mottuk, L. (2001). Implementing offender classification systems: Lessons learned. In: G. A. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington, A. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice (pp. 227-245). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
8. Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T., Bourgon, G., & Yessine, A. K. (2008). Exploring the black box of community supervision. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47, 248-270. DOI: 10.1080/10509670802134085
9. Borum, R. (1996). Improving the clinical practice of violent risk assessment: Technology, guidelines and training. American Psychologist, 51, 945-956. DOI: 10.1177/009385402236734
10. Borum, R., & Douglas, K. (2003). New directions in violence risk assessment. Psychiatric Times, 20(3), 102-103.
11. Borum, R., & Verhaagen, D. (2006). Assessing and Managing Violence Risk in Juveniles. New York: The Guilford Press.
12. Borum, R., Bartel, P. A., & Forth, A. (2006). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Florida: Psychological Assessment Resource, Inc.
13. Borum, R., Lodewijks, H., Bartel, P. A., & Forth, A. E. (2010). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). In: R. K. Otto, K. S. Douglas (Eds). Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 63-79). New York: Routledge/Taylor 8c Francis Group.
14. Calley, N. G., & Richardson, E. M. (2011). Clinical prediction making: Examining influential factors related to clinician predictions of recidivism among juvenile offenders. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling, 32, 2-15. DOI:10.1002/j.2161-1874.2011.tb00203.x
15. Douglas, K. S., Webster, C. D., Hart, S. D., Eaves, D., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (Eds.) (2001). HCR-20: Violence risk management companion guide. Burnaby, BC, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University, and Department of Mental Health Law & Policy, University of South Florida.
16. Flores, A. W., Travis, L. F., & Latessa, E. J. (2004). Case classification for juvenile corrections: An assessment of the Youth Level of Service/ Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI), executive summary (98-JB-VX-0108). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
17. Gatti, U., Trembley, R. E., & Vitaro, F. (2009). Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 991-998. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02057
18. Gauron, E. F., & Dickinson, J. K. (1966). Diagnostic decision making in psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 14, 225-232.
19. Giles, M., & Mullineux, J. (2000). Assessment and decision-making: Probation officers' constructing of factors relevant to risk. Legal and Criminal Psychology, 5, 165-185. Retrieved from
20. Gottfredson, S. D., & Moriarty, L. J. (2006). Clinical versus actuarial judgments in criminal justice decisions: Should one replace the other? Federal Probation, 70(2), 15-18.
21. Griffin, P., & Torbet, P. (2002). Desktop guide to good juvenile probation practice: Mission-Driven, performance-based, outcome-focused probation. Retrieved February 10, 2012, from
22. Griffin, P., & Bozynski, M. (2003). National overviews: State juvenile justice profiles. Retrieved November 5, 2003, from
23. Grisso, T., Vincent, G. M., & Seagrave, D. (Eds.) (2005). Mental Health Screening and Assessment for Juvenile Justice. New York: Guilford Press.
24. Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323. Retrieved from
25. Guy, L. S. (2008). Performance indicators of the structured professional judgment approach for assessing risk for violence to others: A meta-analytic survey. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
26. Guy, L. S., & Vincent, G. M. (2011, March). Field inter-rater reliability of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI with probation officers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology Law Society, Miami, FL.
27. Hanson, R. K. (2009). The psychological assessment of risk for crime and violence. Canadian Psychology, 50, 172-182. DOI: 10.1037/a0015726
28. Harris, P. M., Gingerich, R., & Wittaker, T. A. (2004). The "effectiveness" of differential supervision. Crime and Delinquency, 50(2), 235-271. DOI: 10.1177/0011128703258939
29. Hart, S. D., & Logan, C. (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. In: P. Sturney, M. McMurran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation. DOI: 10.1002/9781119977018.ch4
30. Hoge, R. D. (2002). Standardized instruments for assessing risk and need in youthful offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 380-396.
31. Hoge, R. D. (2009). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. In: R. Otto, K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment. Oxford, UK: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
32. Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (2006). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory: User's manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
33. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237-251. DOI:10.1037/h0034747 DOI:dx.doi.org
34. Latessa, E. J., & Lovins, B. (2010). The role of offender risk assessment: A policy maker guide. Victims & Offenders, 5, 203-219. DOI:10.1080/15564886.2010.485900
35. Latessa, E. J., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2005). What are criminogenic needs and why are they important? For the Record, 4th Quarter, 15-16.
36. Latessa, E. J., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2006). What Works in Reducing Recidivism? University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 3(3), 521-535.
37. Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4, 124-147. DOI:10.1080/15564880802612573
38. Lodewijks, H. P. B., Doreleijers, T. H. A., & de Ruiter, C. (2008). SAVRY risk assessment in violent Dutch adolescents: Relation to sentencing and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 696-709. DOI: 10.1177/0093854808316146
39. Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2004). Understanding the risk principle: How and why correctional interventions can harm low-risk offenders. In Topics and community corrections (pp. 3-8). Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
40. Meehl, P. E. (1996). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence (pp. v-xii). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield/Jason Aronson. (Original work published 1954).
41. Meehl, P. E., & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 194-216. DOI:10.1037/h0048070
42. Oleson, J. C., VanBenschoten, S. W., Robinson, C. R., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2011). Training to see risk: Measuring the clinical and actuarial risk assessments among federal probation officers. Federal Probation, 75(2), 52-56.
43. Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2009). Risk assessment with young offenders: A meta-analysis of three assessment measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 329-353. DOI:10.1177/0093854809331457
44. Puzzanchera, C., Adams, B., & Sickmund, M. (2011). Juvenile Court Statistics 2008. Report. Pittsburgh, Pa: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
45. Richardson, M. (2008). Risky business: An examiniation of probation officers' attitudes towards risk assessment (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland). Retrieved from
46. Schwalbe, C. S. (2007). A meta-analysis of juvenile risk assessment predictive validity. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 449-462. DOI:10.1007/s 10979-006-9071-7
47. Schwalbe, C. S. (2008). A meta-analysis of juvenile justice risk assessment instruments: Predictive validity by gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1367-1381. DOI: 10.1177/0093854808324377
48. Towberman, D. B. (1992). A national survey of juvenile risk assessment. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 43, 61-67. DOI:10.1111/j.1755-6988.1992.tb00720.x
49. Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., Gershenson, B. G., & Fusco, S. L. (2012). Field reliability of the SAVRY with probation officers: Implications for training. Law and Human Behavior. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/s10979-011-9284-2
50. Vincent, G. M., Paiva-Salisbury, M., Cook, N. E., Guy, L. S., & Perrault, R. T. (2012). Impact of Risk/Needs Assessment on Juvenile Probation Officers' Decision-Making: Importance of Implementation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1037/a0027186
51. Vincent, G. M., Terry, A., & Maney, S. (2009). Risk/Needs tools for antisocial behavior and violence among youthful populations. In: J. Andrade (Ed). Handbook of Violence Risk Assessment and Treatment for Forensic Mental health Practitioners (pp. 337-424). New York: Springer.
52. Welsh, J., Schmidt, F., McKinnon, L., Chatta, H. K., & Meyers, J. R. (2008). A comparative study of adolescent risk assessment instruments: Predictive and incremental validity. Assessment, 15, 104-115.
53. Yang, M., Wong, S. C. P., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740-767. DOI: 10.1037/a0020473