Colour and spatial cueing in low-prevalence visual search

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 65, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1327-1344

  Russell, Nicholas C C ^a   Kunar, Melina A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Low prevalence; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864724422     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.656662     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bretz, E. A. 2002. Delayed arrival for US baggage screening. IEEE Spectrum, 39(5): 16-19.
2. Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P. and Shulman, G. L. 2000. Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 3(3): 292-297.
3. Eckstein, M. P., Thomas, J. P., Palmer, J. and Shimozaki, S. S. 2000. A signal detection model predicts effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction and disjunction displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 62: 425-451.
4. Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A. and Garbart, H. 1984. Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(1): 32-39.
5. Evans, J. P. O., Wang, X., Chan, J. W., Downes, D. and Liu, Y. 2006. "Color 3D x-ray imaging for security screening". In IET-The Crime and Security Conference: Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention (pp. 372-377). London, June 2006
6. Fenton, J. J., Taplin, S. H., Carney, P. A., Linn, A., Sickles, E. A.D'Orsi, C. 2007. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. The New England Journal of Medicine, 356(14): 1399-1409.
7. Fleck, M. S. and Mitroff, S. R. 2007. Rare targets are rarely missed in correctable search. Psychological Science, 18(11): 943-947.
8. Godwin, H. J., Menneer, T., Cave, K. R., Helman, S., Way, R. L. and Donnelly, N. 2010. The impact of relative prevalence on dual-target search for threat items from airport X-ray screening. Acta Psychologica, 134(1): 79-84.
9. Guardian Technologies International. 2008. Security Screening Retrieved July 7, 2009, from Guardian Technologies International: http://www.guardiantechintl.com/security.php?npage=pinpoint
10. Hannus, A., van den Berg, R., Bekkering, H., Roerdink, J. B. T. M. and Cornelissen, F. W. 2006. Visual search near threshold: Some features are more equal than others. Journal of Vision, 6: 523-540.
11. Hogg, R. V. and Craig, A. T. 1995. Introduction to mathematical statistics, 5, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International.
12. Itti, L. and Koch, C. 2000. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40: 1489-1506.
13. Jonides, J. 1981. "Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind's eye's movement". In Attention and Performance IX, Edited by: Long, J. B. and Baddeley, A. D. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Kunar, M. A., Rich, A. N. and Wolfe, J. M. 2010. Spatial and temporal separation fails to counteract the effects of low prevalence in visual search. Visual Cognition, 18: 881-897.
15. Leung, J. W., Margolin, F. R., Dee, K. E., Jacobs, R. P., Denny, S. R. and Schrumpf, J. D. 2007. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography in a community practice: Are there differences between specialists and general radiologists?. American Journal of Roentgenology, 188(1): 236-341.
16. Luria, S. M. and Strauss, M. S. 1975. Eye movements during search for coded and uncoded targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 17: 303-308.
17. Michel, S., Koller, S. M., Ruh, M. and Schwaninger, A. 2007. "Do "image enhancement" functions really enhance x-ray image interpretation?". In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society, 1301-1306. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
18. Motter, B. C. and Belky, E. J. 1998. The guidance of eye movements during active visual search. Vision Research, 38: 1805-1815.
19. Navalpakkam, V., Koch, C. and Perona, P. 2009. Homo economicus in visual search. Journal of Vision, 9(1): 1-16.
20. Parks, L. 2007. Points of departure: The culture of US airport screening. Journal of Visual Culture, 6(2): 183-200.
21. Posner, M. I. 1980. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32: 3-25.
22. Posner, M. I. and Cohen, Y. 1984. "Components of visual orienting". In Attention & Performance X, Edited by: Bouma, H. and Bouwhuis, D. 531-556. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Remington, R., Johnston, J. C. and Yantis, S. 1992. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 51: 279-290.
24. Rich, A. N., Kunar, M. A., Van Wert, M. J., Hidalgo-Sotelo, B., Horowitz, T. S. and Wolfe, J. M. 2008. Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect. Journal of Vision, 8(15): 1-17.
25. Rubenstein, J. 2001. Test and evaluation plan: X-Ray Image Screener Selection Test (Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-01/47). Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Research
26. Theeuwes, J. 1992. Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51: 599-606.
27. Treisman, A. M. and Gelade, G. 1980. A feature-integreation theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12: 97-136.
28. Van Wert, M. J., Horowitz, T. S. and Wolfe, J. M. 2009. Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71(3): 541-553.
29. Verghese, P. 2001. Visual search and attention: A signal detection theory approach. Neuron, 31(4): 523-535.
30. Williams, D. E. and Reingold, E. M. 2001. Preattentive guidance of eye movements during triple conjunction search tasks: The effects of feature discriminability and saccadic amplitude. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3): 476-488.
31. Wolfe, J. M. 1998. What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search?. Psychological Science, 9(1): 33-39.
32. Wolfe, J. M. 2007. "Guided Search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search". In Integrated models of cognitive systems, Edited by: Gray, W. 99-119. New York, NY: Oxford.
33. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R. and Franzel, S. L. 1989. Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3): 419-433.
34. Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S. and Kenner, N. M. 2005. Rare items often missed in visual search. Nature, 435: 439-440.
35. Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Ven Wert, M. J., Kenner, N. M., Place, S. S. and Kibbi, N. 2007. Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 136(4): 623-638.
36. Wolfe, J. M. and Van Wert, M. J. 2010. Varying target prevalence reveals two, dissociable decision criteria in visual search. Current Biology, 20: 121-124.
37. Zelinsky, G. J. 2003. Detecting changes between real-world objects using spatiochromatic filters. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10: 533-555.
38. Zelinsky, G. J. 2008. A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychological Review, 115(4): 787-835.