GP under streaming data constraints: A case for pareto archiving?

GECCO'12 - Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 703-710

  Atwater, Aaron ^a   Heywood, Malcolm I ^a   Zincir Heywood, Nur ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

coevolution; genetic programming; online learning; pareto archiving; streaming data

Indexed keywords

CLASS IMBALANCE; CO-EVOLUTION; CO-EVOLUTIONARY; COMPETITIVE COEVOLUTION; DATA SETS; FINITE SIZE; MULTI-CLASS; ON-LINE ADAPTATION; ONLINE EVOLUTION; ONLINE LEARNING; PARETO ARCHIVING; RELATIVE IMPACT; STREAMING DATA;

EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; GENETIC PROGRAMMING; PARETO PRINCIPLE;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84864717127     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2330163.2330262     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. H. Abdulsalam, D. B. Skillicorn, and P. Martin. Classification using streaming random forests. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(1):22-36, 2011.
2. J. Cartlidge and D. Ait-Boudaoud. Autonomous virulence adaptation improves coevolutionary optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 15(2):215-229, 2011.
3. E. D. de Jong. A monolithic archive for pareto-coevolution. Evolutionary Computation, 15(1):61-93, 2007.
4. I. Dempsey, M. O'Neill, and A. Brabazon. Adaptive trading with grammatical evolution. In IEEE CEC, pages 2587-2592, 2006.
5. J. A. Doucette, A. R. McIntyre, P. Lichodzijewski, and M. I. Heywood. Symbolic coevolutionary genetic programming: A benchmarking study under large attribute spaces. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 13(1):71-101, 2012.
6. S. G. Ficici and J. Pollack. Pareto optimality in coevolutionary learning. In European Conference on Advances in Artificial Life, pages 316-325, 2001.
7. C. Gathercole and P. Ross. Dynamic training subset selection for supervised learning in genetic programming. In PPSN, pages 312-321, 1994.
8. M. Kotanchek, G. Smits, and E. Vladislavleva. Exploiting trustable models via pareto GP for targeted data collection. In Genetic Programming Theory and Practice VI, pages 145-162. Springer, 2009.
9. M. Lemczyk. Pareto-cevolutionary genetic programming classifier. Master's thesis, Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, 2006. http://web.cs.dal.ca/~mheywood/Thesis/MCS.html.
10. P. Lichodzijewski and M. I. Heywood. Pareto-coevolutionary genetic programming for problem decomposition in multi-class classification. In ACM GECCO, pages 464-471, 2007.
11. P. Lichodzijewski and M. I. Heywood. Managing team-based problem solving with symbiotic bid-based genetic programming. In ACM GECCO, pages 363-370, 2008.
12. A. R. McIntyre and M. I. Heywood. Cooperative problem decomposition in pareto competitive classifier models of coevolution. In European Conference on Genetic Programming, pages 289-300, 2008.
13. R. W. Morrison. Designing evolutionary algorithms for dynamic environments. Springer, 2004.
14. J. Noble and R. A. Watson. Pareto coevolution: Using performance against coevolved opponents in a game as dimensions for pareto selection. In ACM GECCO, pages 493-500, 2001.
15. M. O'Neill, L. Vanneschi, S. Gustafson, and W. Banzhaf. Open issues in genetic programming. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 11(3):339-363, 2010.
16. N. Wagner, Z. Michalewicz, M. Khouja, and R. R. McGregor. Time series forecasting for dynamic environments: The DyFor genetic program model. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11(4):433-452, 2007.
17. S. X. Wu and W. Banzhaf. Rethinking multilevel selection in genetic programming. In ACM GECCO, pages 1403-1410, 2011.
18. X. Zhu, P. Zhang, X. Lin, and Y. Shi. Active learning from stream data using optimal weight classifier ensemble. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B, 40(6):1607-1621, 2010.