Decentralization: New Modes of Governance and Administrative Responsibility

Administration and Society

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 595-624

  Bannink, Duco ^a   Ossewaarde, Ringo ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

administrative reform; decentralization; shifts in governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864704578     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: 15523039     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095399711419096     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Agranoff R.,McGuire M.Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2003:.
2. Bannink D.The reform of Dutch disability insurance. A confrontation of a policy learning and a policy feedback approach to welfare state change. Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente; 2004:.
3. Bannink D.,Bosselaar H.,Trommel W.Reform of the Dutch social assistance act: From income protection to an activating policy paradigm. Research project commissioned by the French Government represented by the Direction de la Recherche, des Etudes, de l'Evaluation et des Statistiques. Amsterdam, Netherlands: VU University Amsterdam; 2011:.
4. Bannink D.,Hoogenboom M.Hidden change: Disaggregation of welfare regimes for greater insight into welfare state change.Journal of European Social Policy. 2007;17:19-32.
5. Bannink D.,Kuipers S.,Lantink T.Reform in Europe: Breaking the barriers in government. Heyse L.Resodihardjo S.Lantink T.Lettinga B., ed. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate; 2006:107-126.
6. Bellah R. N.,Madsen R.,Sullivan W. M.,Swidler A.,Tipton S. M.The good society. New York, NY: Vintage Books; 1992:.
7. Berkowitz E.,McQuaid K.Creating the welfare state: The political economy of twentieth-century reform. New York, NY: Praeger; 1980:.
8. Bevir M.,Trentmann F.Governance, consumers and citizens: Agency and resistance in contemporary politics. London, England: Palgrave MacMillan; 2007:.
9. Bieber U.,Bannink D.Ausflug ins Reform-Labyrinth der Niederländisches Erwerbsminderungsrenten.Deutsche Renten Versicherung. 2005;60:599-620.
10. Bosselaar H.,Bannink D.,van Deursen G.,Trommel W.Werkt de WWB? Resultaten van de ontwikkeling van nieuwe verhoudingen tussen Rijk en gemeenten. Eindrapport evaluatie Wet Werk en Bijstand. The Hague, Netherlands: Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment; 2007:.
11. Bovens M.The quest for responsibility: Accountability and citizenship in complex organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998:.
12. Carozza P. G.Subsidiarity as a structural principle of international human rights law.American Journal of International Law. 2003;97:38-79.
13. CitiM.RhodesM. (2007). New modes of governance in the EU: Common objectives versus national preferences(European Governance Papers N-07-01). Retrieved from http://connex-network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-newgov-N-07-01.pdf.
14. Clarke J.,Newman J.The managerial state: Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1997:.
15. Cohen J.Whose sovereignty? Empire versus international law.Ethics & International Affairs. 2004;18 (3): 1-24.
16. Cox R.The development of the Dutch welfare state: From workers' insurance to universal entitlement. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press; 1993:.
17. Dahrendorf R.The modern social conflict: An essay on the politics of liberty. New York, NY: Weidenfeld & Nicolson; 1988:.
18. De la Porte C.,Pochet P.,Room G.Social benchmarking, policy making and new governance in the EU.Journal of European Social Policies. 2001;11:291-307.
19. De Swaan A.In care of the state: Health care, education and welfare in Europe and the USA in the modern era. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1988:.
20. De Vries W.De totstandkoming van de Ongevallenwet 1901. De invloed van werkgevers en werknemers op de eerste sociale verzekeringswet in Nederland. Deventer, Netherlands: Kluwer; 1970:.
21. Meer dan ooit. Sociale diensten en participatiebevordering. Divosa-monitor 2009. Utrecht, Netherlands: Author; 2009:.
22. Scherp aan de wind. Sociale diensten en participatiebevordering. Divosa-monitor 2010. Utrecht, Netherlands: Author; 2010:.
23. Durant R.Whither the neoadministrative state? Toward a polity-centered theory of administrative reform.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2000;10:79-109.
24. Etzioni A.Sovereignty as responsibility.Orbis. 2006;50:71-85.
25. Falk R.Revisiting Westphalia, discovering post-Westphalia.Journal of Ethics. 2002;6:311-352.
26. Falkner G.EU social policy in the 1990s: Towards a corporatist policy community. London, England: Routledge; 1998:.
27. Ferrera M.,Matsanganis M.,Sacchi S.Open coordination against poverty: The new EU "social inclusion process".Journal of European Social Policies. 2002;12:227-239.
28. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Hall P.Soskice D., ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001:.
29. Héritier A.Common goods: Reinventing European and international governance. Héritier A., ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2002:185-206.
30. Héritier A.,Eckert S.New modes of governance in the shadow of hierarchy: Self-regulation by industry in Europe.Journal of Public Policy. 2008;28:113-138.
31. Hoogerwerf A.Overheidsbeleid. Hoogerwerf A.Herweijer M., ed. Deventer, Netherlands: Kluwer; 2003:17-36.
32. Huber J.,Shipan C.Deliberate discretion? The institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
33. Jacobsson K.Soft regulation and the subtle transformation of states: The case of EU employment policy.Journal of European Social Policies. 2004;14:355-370.
34. Knill C.,Lehmkuhl D.Common goods: Reinventing European and international governance. Héritier A., ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2002:85-104.
35. KnillC.LenschowA. (2003). Modes of regulation in the governance of the European Union: Towards a comprehensive evaluation (European Integration Online Papers No. 7). Retrieved from http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2003-001a.htm.
36. Krasner S.Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1999:.
37. Levy D.,Sznaider N.Sovereignty transformed: A sociology of human rights.British Journal of Sociology. 2006;57:657-676.
38. Lipsky M.Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 1980:.
39. Loughlin J.Sovereignties in transition. Walker N., ed. Oxford, UK: Hart; 2003:55-86.
40. Mayntz R.Societal change between market and organization. Child J.Crozier M.Mayntz R., ed. Aldershot, UK: Avebury; 1993:3-18.
41. Meunier S.The French exception.Foreign Affairs. 2000;79:104-116.
42. Beleidsbrief Mantelzorg en Vrijwilligerswerk 2008-2011. The Hague, Netherlands: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; 2007:.
43. Moe T.Political control and the power of the agent.Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization. 2005;22:1-29.
44. Nakamura R.,Smallwood F.The politics of policy implementation. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press; 1980:.
45. O'Connor J.Policy coordination, social indicators and the social-policy agenda in the European Union.Journal of European Social Policies. 2005;15:345-361.
46. Olson M.The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1971:.
47. Osborne D.,Gaebler T.Reinventing government How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1992:.
48. Osiander A.Sovereignty, international relations, and the Westphalian myth.International Organization. 2001;55:251-287.
49. Ossewaarde M.The new social contract and the struggle for sovereignty in the Netherlands.Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics. 2007a;42:491-512.
50. Ossewaarde M.Three rival versions of political enquiry: Althusius and the concept of sphere sovereignty.Monist. 2007b;90:106-125.
51. Ostrom E.Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
52. Pollitt C.,Bouckaert G.Public management reform: A comparative analysis. 2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (2nd ed.) Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2004:.
53. Robinson M.Hybrid states: Globalisation and the politics of state capacity.Political Studies. 2008;56:566-583.
54. Scharpf F.Notes toward a theory of multilevel governing in Europe.Scandinavian Political Studies. 2001;24:1-26.
55. Schmitter P.Still the century of corporatism?.Review of politics. 1974;36:85-131.
56. Schwitters R.De risico's van de arbeid. Het ontstaan van de Ongevallenwet 1901 in sociologisch perspectief. Groningen, Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff; 1991:.
57. Handreiking Burgerparticipatie in de Wmo. The Hague, Netherlands: Author; 2006:.
58. Jaarrapport benchmark Wwb 2009. The Hague, Netherlands: Author; 2009:.
59. Skocpol T.Social policy in the United States: Future possibilities in historical perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1995:.
60. Skocpol T.The Tocqueville problem: Civic engagement in American democracy.Social Science History. 1997;21:455-478.
61. Arboconvenanten nieuwe stijl. Beleidsstrategie voor de komende vier jaar (1999-2002). The Hague, Netherlands: Documents Second Chamber of Dutch Parliament; 1998-1999:.
62. Wet Werk en Bijstand. Memorie van Toelichting. The Hague, Netherlands: Documents Second Chamber of Dutch Parliament; 2002-2003:.
63. Wet maatschappelijke ondersteuning. Memorie van toelichting. The Hague, Netherlands: Documents Second Chamber of Dutch Parliament; 2005-2006:.
64. Wet maatschappelijke ondersteuning. Amendement over het compensatiebeginsel. The Hague, Netherlands: Documents Second Chamber of Dutch Parliament; 2005-2006:.
65. De herverdeelde samenleving. Ontwikkeling en herziening van de Nederlandse verzorgingsstaat. Trommel W.Van der Veen R., ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press; 1999:.
66. De stagnerende verzorgingsstaat. Van Doorn J.Schuyt C., ed. Meppel, Netherlands: Boom; 1978:.
67. Van Kersbergen K.,Van Waarden F."Governance" as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy.European Journal of Political Research. 2004;43:143-171.
68. Van Ours J.De werking van de Wet werk en bijstand.Entrepreneur & Self-Employed Business. 2007;92:292-295.
69. Van Thiel S.,Leeuw F.Productivity in review: The performance paradox in the public sector.Public Performance & Management Review. 2002;25:267-281.
70. Veerman T.,de Jong P.,de Vroom B.,Bannink D.,Mur S.,Ossewaarde M.,Vellekoop N.Convenanten in context: Aggregatie en analyse van de werking en opbrengsten van het beleidsprogramma Arboconvenanten. The Hague, Netherlands: Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment; 2007:.
71. Visser J.,Hemerijck A.A Dutch miracle: Job growth, welfare reform and corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press; 1997:.
72. Walker N.Sovereignties in transition. Oxford, UK: Hart; 2003:.
73. Ziller J.Sovereignties in transition. Walker N., ed. Oxford, UK: Hart; 2003:261-277.