Sensitization of food reinforcement is related to weight status and baseline food reinforcement

International Journal of Obesity

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1102-1107

  Temple, J L ^a   Epstein, L H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

energy intake; food reinforcement; motivation; satiation; sensitization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; OBESITY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; REVIEW; SATIETY; SENSITIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BODY MASS INDEX; DIET, HIGH-FAT; EATING; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; FOOD HABITS; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; OBESITY; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SATIATION; THINNESS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864681299     PISSN: 03070565     EISSN: 14765497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2011.210     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Bickel WK, Marsch LA, Carroll ME. Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal. Psychopharmacology 2000; 153: 44-56. (Pubitemid 32127903)
2. Epstein LH, Wright SM, Paluch RA, Leddy J, Hawk Jr LW, Jaroni JL et al. Food hedonics and reinforcement as determinants of laboratory food intake in smokers. Physiol Behav 2004; 81: 511-517. (Pubitemid 38591541)
3. Epstein LH, Wright SM, Paluch RA, Leddy JJ, Hawk Jr LW, Jaroni JL et al. Relation between food reinforcement and dopamine genotypes and its effect on food intake in smokers. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80: 82-88. (Pubitemid 41115559)
4. Saelens BE, Epstein LH. Reinforcing value offood in obese and non-obese women. Appetite 1996; 27: 41-50. (Pubitemid 26313170)
5. Temple JL, Legierski CM, Giacomelli AM, Salvy SJ, Epstein LH. Overweight children find food more reinforcing and consume more energy than do nonoverweight children. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87: 1121-1127. (Pubitemid 351679748)
6. Epstein LH, Saad FG, Handley EA, Roemmich JN, Hawk LW, McSweeney FK. Habituation of salivation and motivated responding forfood in children. Appetite 2003; 41: 283-289. (Pubitemid 37444071)
7. Myers Ernst M, Epstein LH. Habituation of responding for food in humans. Appetite 2002; 38: 224-234. (Pubitemid 34734858)
8. Raynor HA, Epstein LH. The relative-reinforcing value offood under differing levels of food deprivation and restriction. Appetite 2003; 40: 15-24. (Pubitemid 36288459)
9. Temple JL, Giacomelli AM, Roemmich JN, Epstein LH. Dietary variety impairs habituation in children. Health Psychol 2008; 27: S10-S19. (Pubitemid 351754906)
10. Lappalainen R, Epstein LH. A behavioral economics analysis offood choice in humans. Appetite 1990; 14: 81-93.
11. Goldfield GS, Epstein LH. Can fruits and vegetables and activities substitute for snack foods? Health Psychol 2002; 21: 299-303.
12. Clark EN, Dewey AM, Temple JL. Effects of daily snack food intake on food reinforcement depend on body mass index and energy density. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 91: 300-308.
13. Temple JL, Bulkley AM, Badawy RL, Krause N, McCann S, Epstein LH. Differential effects of daily snack food intake on the reinforcing value of food in obese and nonobese women. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 90: 304-313.
14. Temple JL, Chappel A, Shalik J, Volcy S, Epstein LH. Daily consumption of individual snack foods decreases their reinforcing value. Eat Behav 2008; 9: 267-276. (Pubitemid 351781276)
15. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis ofdrug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory ofaddiction. Brain Res 1993; 18: 247-291. (Pubitemid 23219500)
16. Hobbs M, Remington B, Glautier S. Dissociation ofwanting and liking for alcohol in humans: a test of the incentive-sensitisation theory. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2005; 178: 493-499. (Pubitemid 40486989)
17. Ostafin BD, Marlatt GA, Troop-Gordon W. Testing the incentive- sensitization theory with at-risk drinkers: wanting, liking, and alcohol consumption. Psychol Addict Behav 2010; 24: 157-162.
18. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 2008; 363: 3137-3146.
19. Keiflin R, Isingrini E, Cador M. Cocaine-induced reinstatement in rats: evidencefor a critical role ofcocaine stimulus properties. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2008; 197: 649-660.
20. Keiflin R,Vouillac C, Cador M. Level ofoperant training rather than cocaine intake predicts level of reinstatement. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2008; 197: 247-261.
21. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 2001; 96: 103-114. (Pubitemid 32099343)
22. Spitzer RL, Yanovski S, Wadden T, Wing R, Marcus MD, Stunkard A et al. Binge eating disorder: its further validation in a multisite study. IntJEatDisord 1993; 13: 137-153. (Pubitemid 23089545)
23. Gormally J, Black S, Daston S, Rardin D. The assessment of binge eating severity among obese persons. Addict Behav 1982; 7: 47-55. (Pubitemid 12131037)
24. Reiss S, Havercamp S. The sensitivity theory of motivation: implications for psychopathology. Behav Res Ther 1996; 34: 621-632. (Pubitemid 26316906)
25. Epstein LH, Temple JL, Neaderhiser BJ, Salis R, Leddy JJ. Food reinforcement, the dopamine D2 receptor genotype, and energy intake in obese and non-obese humans. Behav Neurosci 2007; 121: 877-886. (Pubitemid 350051291)
26. Casey PH, Goolsby SL, Lensing SY, Perloff BP, Bogle ML. The use of telephone interview methodology to obtain 24-hourdietary recalls. JAm DietAssoc 1999; 99: 1406-1411. (Pubitemid 29523643)
27. Tran KM, Johnson RK, Soultanakis RP, Matthews DE. In-person vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: validation with doubly labeled water. JAm DietAssoc2000; 100: 777-783.
28. NHLBI Obesity Education Initiative Expert Panel. Clinical Guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults-The evidence report. Obes Res 1998; 6 (Suppl 2): 51S-209S.
29. Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res 1985; 29: 71-83. (Pubitemid 15134378)
30. Epstein LH, Truesdale R, Wojcik A, Paluch RA, Raynor HA. Effects of deprivation on hedonics and reinforcing value offood. Physiol Behav 2003; 78: 221-227. (Pubitemid 36170184)
31. Epstein LH, Temple JL, Neaderhiser BJ, Salis RJ, Erbe RW, Leddy JJ. Food reinforcement, the dopamine D2 receptor genotype, and energy intake in obese and nonobese humans. Behav Neurosci 2007; 121: 877-886. (Pubitemid 350051291)
32. Podlesnik CA, Shahan TA. Reinforcer satiation and resistance to change of responding maintained by qualitatively different reinforcers. BehavProcesses 2009; 81: 126-132.
33. Hetherington MM, Bell A, Rolls BJ. Effects of repeated consumption on pleasantness, preference, and intake. Br Food J 2000; 102: 507-521.
34. Hetherington MM, Foster R, Newman T, Anderson AS, Norton G. Understanding variety: tasting different foods delays satiation. Physiol Behav 2006; 87: 263-271. (Pubitemid 43188822)
35. Hetherington MM, Pirie LM, Nabb S. Stimulus satiation: effects of repeated exposure to foods on pleasantness and intake. Appetite 2002; 38: 19-28. (Pubitemid 34412107)
36. Raynor HA, Epstein LH. Dietary variety, energy regulation, and obesity. Psychol Bull 2001; 127: 325-341. (Pubitemid 33610285)
37. Hill C, Saxton J, Webber L, Blundell J, Wardle J. The relative reinforcing value of food predicts weight gain in a longitudinal study of 7-10-y-old children. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 90: 276-281.
38. Carelli RM. Nucleus accumbens cell firing and rapid dopamine signaling during goal-directed behaviors in rats. Neuropharmacology 2004; 47 (Suppl 1): 180-189. (Pubitemid 39298263)