Validation of the activities assessment scale in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery

Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 205-210

  Barber, Matthew D ^a   Kenton, Kim ^b   Janz, Nancy K ^c   Hsu, Yvonne ^d   Dyer, Keisha Y ^e   Greer, W Jerod ^f   White, Amanda ^g   Meikle, Susie ^h   Ye, Wen ^c  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional activity; Pelvic organ prolapse; Pelvic reconstructive surgery; Postoperative activity; Scales

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS;

ASSESSMENT SCALE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; EFFECT SIZE; FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIES; LONGITUDINAL DATA; LOWER CORRELATION; PEARSON CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY; SCALES; STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCES;

SURGERY;

AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PSYCHOMETRY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STRESS INCONTINENCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS;

EID: 84864668307     PISSN: 21518378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31825e6422     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, et al. Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:88-92.
2. Bombardier C, Melfi CA, Paul J, et al. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med Care 1995;33:AS131-AS144.
3. Josbeno DA, Kalarchin M, Sparto PJ, et al. Physical activity and physical function in individuals post-bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2010;6(4): 361-366.
4. Miller GD, Nicklas BJ, You T, et al. Physical function improvements after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2009;5:530-537.
5. Yamashita T, Aota Y, Kushida K, et al. Changes in physical function after palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumor: association of the revised Tokuhashi score with neurologic recovery. Spine 2008;33: 2341-2348.
6. McCarthy M Jr, Jonasson O, Chang CH, et al. Assessment of patient functional status after surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:171-178.
7. Neumayer L, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R, et al. Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: the design of a trial to compare open and laparoscopic surgical techniques. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:743-752.
8. Eckardt AJ, Swales C, Bhattacharya K, et al. Open access colonoscopy in the training setting: which factors affect patient satisfaction and pain? Endoscopy 2008;40:98-105.
9. Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, et al. The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008;33:S39-S51.
10. Koch CG, Khandwala F, Cywinski JB, et al. Health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting: a gender analysis using the Duke Activity Status Index. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:284-295.
11. Taenzer AH, Clark C, Curry CS. Gender affects report of pain and function after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Anesthesiology 2000;93:670-675.
12. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Menefee S, et al. Operations and pelvic muscle training in the management of apical support loss (OPTIMAL) trial: design and methods. Contemp Clin Trials 2009;30:178-189.
13. Ware JE Jr. Users Guide for SF-36v2 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorportated; 2007.
14. Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56: 395-407.
15. Nygaard I, Handa V, Brubaker L, et al. Physical activity in women planning sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J 2007;18:33-37.
16. Nygaard I, Handa VL, Brubaker L, et al. Changes in physical activity after abdominal sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:570.e1-570.e5.
17. Jorgensen S, Hein HO, Gyntelberg F. Heavy lifting at work and risk of genital prolapse and herniated lumbar disc in assistant nurses. Occup Med 1994;44:47-49.
18. Chiaffarino F, Chatenoud L, Dindelli M, et al. Reproductive factors, family history, occupation and risk of urogenital prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;82:63-67.
19. Mallett VT, BrubakerL, Stoddard AM, et al for the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. The expectations of patients who undergo surgery for stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198: 308.e1-308.e6.
20. Yost KJ, Eton DT. Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: the FACIT experience. Eval Health Prof 2005;28:172-191.
21. Leidy NK, Wyrwich KW. Bridging the gap: using triangulation methodology to estimate minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). COPD 2005;2:157-165.