The expectations of patients who undergo surgery for stress incontinence

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 198, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 308.e1-308.e6

  Mallett, Veronica T ^a   Brubaker, Linda ^b   Stoddard, Anne M ^c   Borello France, Diane ^d   Tennstedt, Sharon ^c   Hall, Lynn ^e   Hammontree, Lee ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

^d DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

informed consent; patient expectation; surgical outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BURCH COLPOSUSPENSION; COLPOSUSPENSION; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT EXPECTATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECTUS FASCIAL SLING; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYMPTOM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE; URINARY FREQUENCY; URINARY URGENCY; URINE INCONTINENCE;

EID: 39649105654     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Chaikin D.C., Rosenthal J., and Blaivas J.G. Pubovaginal fascial sling for all types of stress urinary incontinence: long-term analysis. J Urol 160 (1998) 1312-1316
2. Ostergard D.R. Primary slings for everyone with genuine stress incontinence?. The argument against. Int Urgynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 8 (1997) 321-322
3. Elkadry E.A., Kenton K.S., FitzGerald M.P., Shott S., and Brubaker L. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189 (2003) 1551-1558
4. Mahajan S.T., Elkadry E.A., Kenton K.S., Shott S., and Brubaker L. Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 (2006) 722-728
5. Mahomed N.N., Liang M.H., Cook E.F., et al. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 29 (2002) 1273-1279
6. Jones K.R., Burney R.E., and Christy B. Patient expectations for surgery: are they being met?. J Qual Improve 26 (2000) 349-360
7. McKinley R.K., Stevenson K., Adams S., and Manku-Scott T.K. Meeting patient expectations of care: the major determinant of satisfaction with out-of-hours primary medical care?. Fam Pract 19 (2002) 333-338
8. Tennstedt S. Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network: design of the stress incontinence surgical treatment efficacy trial (SISTEr). Urology 66 (2005) 1213-1217
9. Borello-France D, Zyczynski H, Mallett V, Tennstedt S, FitzGerald M, for the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Patient expectations and satisfaction following surgery for stress incontinence [abstract]. American Urogynecologic Society Meeting, San Francisco, CA. 2002
10. Herzog A.R., Diokno A.C., Brown M.B., Normolle D.P., and Brock B.M. Two-year incidence, remission, and change patterns of urinary incontinence in non-institutionalized older adults. J Gerontol 45 (1990) M67-M74 16
11. Richter H., Burgio K., Brubaker L., et al., Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Factors associated with incontinence frequency in a surgical cohort f stress incontinent women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193 (2005) 2088-2093
12. Nam C.B., and Terrie E.W. 1980-based Nam-Powers occupational status scores: 1988 Working Paper 38-48 (1988), Center for the Study of Population, Florida State University, Tallahassee (FL)
13. Ware Jr. J.E., and Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 (1992) 473-483
14. Shumaker S.A., Wyman Uebersax J.S., McClish D., and Fantl J.A. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory: Continence Program in Women Research group. Qual Life Res 3 (1994) 291-306
15. Iversen M.D., Daltroy L.H., Fossel A.H., and Katz J.N. The prognostic importance of patient pre-operative expectations of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient Educ Council 34 (1998) 169-178
16. Nettleman M.D. Patient satisfaction: what's mew?. Clin Perform Qual Health Care 6 (1998) 33-37
17. Douglas T.S., Mann N.H., and Hodge A.L. Evaluation of preoperative patient education and computer assisted instructions. J Spinal Disord 11 (1998) 28-35
18. Peck B.M., Asch D.A., Gool S.D., et al. Measuring patient expectations: does the instrument affect satisfaction or expectations?. Med Care 39 (2001) 100-108
19. Bandura A. Self efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84 (1977) 181-197
20. Carrol D.L. The importance of self efficacy in elderly patients recovering from coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Lung 24 (1995) 50-59
21. Mondloch M.V., Cole D.C., and Frank J.W. Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do?. A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes. JAMA 16555 (2001) 174-179
22. Lutz G.K., Butzlaff M.E., Atlas S.J., et al. The relationship between expectations and outcomes in surgery for sciatica. J Gen Intern Med 14 (1999) 740-744