Open access colonoscopy in the training setting: Which factors affect patient satisfaction and pain?

Endoscopy

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 98-105

  Eckardt, Alexander J ^a,c   Swales, C ^a   Bhattacharya, K ^a   Wassef, W Y ^a   Phelan, N P ^a   Zubair, S ^a   Martins, N ^a   Patel, S ^a   Moquin, B ^a   Anwar, N ^a   Leung, K ^b   Levey, J M ^a  

^a UMASS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Biostatistics Research Group   (United States)

^c CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OPEN ACCESS COLONOSCOPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SEDATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONOSCOPY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 39749197475     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995469     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cohen L, Delaney P, Boston P. Listening to the customer: implementing a patient satisfaction measurement system. Gastroenterol Nurs 1994; 17:110-115
2. Ahorny L, Strasser S. Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to explore. Med Care Rev 1993; 50: 49-80
3. Yacavone RF Locke R, Gostout CJ et al. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 703-710
4. Sincock J, Dunn SV, Pretty L. Patient satisfaction with an outpatient endoscopic service. Gastroenterol Nurs 1999: 22: 193-198
5. Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, de Groen PC. Utility of web-based assessment of patient satisfaction with endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1016-1021
6. Larsen IK, Grotmol T, Bretthauer M et al. Continuous evaluation of patient satisfaction in endoscopy centres. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 7: 850-855
7. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 544-560
8. Cram P. Fendrick M, Inadomi J et al. The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening. The Katie Couric effect. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 1601-1605
9. Vijan S, Inadomi J, Hayward RA et al. Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20: 507-515
10. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1872-1885
11. Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Dong FB et al. Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States? Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 1661-1669
12. Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Bowen NJ et al. Patient satisfaction with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 1790-1796
13. Jackson JL, Osgard E, Fincher RK. Resident participation in flexible sigmoidoscopy does not affect patient satisfaction. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 1563-1566
14. Cockburn J, Hill D, Irwig L et al. Development and validation of an instrument to measure satisfaction of participants at breast screening programmes. Eur J Cancer 1991; 27: 827-831
15. Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Baum A. Development of a simple instrument to measure patient satisfaction with flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 1995; 108: A34
16. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Portish V. Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 554-559
17. Waring JP, Baron TH, Hirota WK et al. Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 317-322
18. Kisloff B, Peele PB, Shararn R et al. Quality of patient referral information for open-access endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 565-569
19. Keats AS. The ASA classification of physical status: A recapitulation. Anesthesiology 1978; 49: 233
20. Cohen JA. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20:37-46
21. Church J. Oakley J, Milsorn J et al. Colonoscopy training: The need for patience (patients). ANZJ Surg 2002; 72: 89-91
22. Fasih T, Varma JS, Tabaqchali MA. Prospective audit of quality of colonoscopy in a surgical coloproctology unit. Surgeon 2004; 2: 170
23. Chak A, Cooper GS, Blades EW et al. Prospective assessment of colonoscopic intubation skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 54-57
24. Marshali JB. Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 287-291
25. Chung KC, Hamill JB, Kim HM et al. Predictors of patient satisfaction in an outpatient plastic surgery clinic. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 42: 56-60
26. Boudreaux ED, Friedman J, Chansky ME et al. Emergency department patient satisfaction: examining the role of acuity. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11: 162-168
27. Hedges JR, Trout A. Magnusson AR. Satisfied patients exiting the emergency department (SPEED) study. Acad Emerg Med 2002; 9: 15-21
28. Takahashi Y, Tanaka H, Kinjo M et al. Prospective evaluation of factors predicting difficulty and pain during sedation -free colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1295-1300
29. Speroni KG, Hannah J, Atherton M et al. Evaluation of demographic, behavioral, and procedural factors on pain perception by patients undergoing colonoscopy and moderate sedation. Gastroenterol Nurs 2005; 28: 502-508
30. Bini EJ, Firoozi B, Choung RJ et al. Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: a prospective 30-day outcomes study. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 8-16