Declining mammography screening in a state medicaid fee-for-service program: 1999-2008

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 821-829

  Bhanegaonkar, Abhijeet ^a   Madhavan, S Suresh ^a   Khanna, Rahul ^b   Remick, Scot C ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAID; MEDICAL FEE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; RURAL AREA; SCREENING RATE; SCREENING TEST; TREND STUDY; UNITED STATES; URBAN AREA;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEE-FOR-SERVICE PLANS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAID; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC ASSISTANCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RURAL POPULATION; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES; URBAN POPULATION; WEST VIRGINIA;

EID: 84864667836     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: 1931843X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2011.2748     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer overview, 2009. Available at www.cancer.org/acs/groups/cid/documents/webcontent/003037-pdf.pdf Accessed August 23, 2010.
2. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts & figures 2009-2010. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2009.
3. Chagpar AB, McMasters KM. Trends in mammography and clinical breast examination: A population-based study. J Surg Res 2007;140:214-219.
4. Hansen NM, Growney A. Breast cancer: pre-and postop-erative imaging for staging. Surg Oncol Clin north Am 2007;16:447-463.
5. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts & figures 2007-2008. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2007.
6. Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1672-1680.
7. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos B, Chan BK, Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: An update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. AHRQ Publication No. 10-05142-EF-5, 2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf09/breastcancer/brcanup. htm Accessed December 20, 2010.
8. Garfinkel L, Boring CC, Heath CW Jr. Changing trends. An overview of breast cancer incidence and mortality. Cancer 1994;74(Suppl 1):222-227
9. Barth RJ Jr, Gibson GR, Carney PA, Mott LA, Becher RD, Poplack SP. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:324-329.
10. Feig SA, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, et al. American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:29-33.
11. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137: 347-360.
12. Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA. Beyond randomized controlled trials: Organized mammo-graphic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 2001;91:1724-1731.
13. Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HH, Smith RA, Duffy SW. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after intro-duction of screening. Lancet 2003;361:1405-1410.
14. Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;4: CD001877
15. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:27-41.
16. National Cancer Institute. Breast cancer (PDQ): Mammo-grams. U.S. National Institutes of Health. Available at www. cancer. gov/cancertopics/ factsheet/Detection/mammograms Accessed December 27, 2009.
17. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Breast cancer screening for women ages 40-49, January 21-23, 1997. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89: 1015-1026.
18. Qaseem A, Snow V, Sherif K, Aronson M, Weiss KB, Owens DK. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: A clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:511-515.
19. Brewer NT, Reiter PL. Assessing and increasing breast can-cer screening. Prev Med 2008;47:483-484.
20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009. Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000. Available at www.cdc.gov/cancer/ nbccedp/legislation/law106-354.htm Accessed July 7, 2010.
21. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010. Volume II: Objectives for improving health (Part B), 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000.
22. Blackman DK, Bennett EM, Miller DS. Trends in self re-ported use of mammograms (1989-1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991-1997)\Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Sys-tem. MMWR CDC Surveillance Communication 1999;48: 1-22.
23. Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: Results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer 2003;97: 1528-1540.
24. Breen N, Cronin K, Meissner HI, Reported drop in mam-mography: Is this cause for concern? Cancer 2007;109:2405-2409.
25. Davis TC, Arnold C, Berkel HJ, Nandy I, Jackson RH, Glass J. Knowledge and attitude on screening mammography among low-literate, low-income women. Cancer 1996;78: 1912-1920.
26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Use of mammog-raphy services by women aged >or =65 years in Medicare\United States, 1991-1993. MMWR 1995;44:777-781.
27. Pearlman DN, Rakowski W, Ehlrich B, Clark MA. Breast cancer screening practices among black, Hispanic, and white women: Reassessing differences. Am J Prev Med 1996;12: 327-337.
28. Halpern MT, Bian J, Ward EM, Schrag NM, Chen AY. In-surance status and stage of cancer at diagnosis among wo-men with breast cancer. Cancer 2007;110:403-411.
29. Halliday T, Taira DA, Davis J, Chan H. Socioeconomic dis-parities in breast cancer screening in Hawaii. Prev Chronic Dis 2007;4:A91.
30. Ives DG, Lave JR, Traven ND, Schulz R, Kuller LH. Mam-mography and Pap smear test use among older rural wo-men. Public Health Rep 1996;111:244-250.
31. Rimer BK, Trock B, Engstrom PF, Lerman C, King E. Why do some women get regular mammograms? Am J Prev Med 1991;7:69-74.
32. Bjurstam N, Björneld L, Duffy SW, et al. The Gothenburg Breast Cancer Screening Trial: Preliminary results on breast cancer mortality for women aged 39-49. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997;22:53-55.
33. Chu KC, Smart CR, Tarone RE. Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health In-surance Plan clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988;80:1125-1132.
34. Adams EK, Breen N, Joski PJ. Impact of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on mam-mography and Pap test utilization among white, Hispanic, and African American women: 1996-2000. Cancer 2007; 109(Suppl 2):348-358.
35. Khanna R, Bhanegaonkar A, Colsher P, Madhavan SS, Halverson J. Breast cancer screening, incidence, and mor-tality in West Virginia. WV Med J 2009;105:24-32.
36. McAlearney AS, Reeves KW, Tatum C, Paskett ED. Per-ceptions of insurance coverage for screening mammography among women in need of screening. Cancer 2005;103:2473-2480.
37. Lyttle NL, Stadelman K. Assessing awareness and knowl-edge of breast and cervical cancer among Appalachian wo-men. Prev Chronic Dis 2006;3:A125.
38. Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Hall HI, Logan P, Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998-1999. Cancer 2002;94:2801-2812.
39. Mobley LR, Kuo TM, Clayton LJ, Evans WD. Mammo-graphy facilities are accessible, so why is utilization so low? Cancer Causes Control 2009;20:1017-1028.
40. Schueler KM, Chu PW, Smith-Bindman R Factors associated with mammography utilization: A systematic quantitative review of the literature. J Womens Health. 2008;17:1477-1498.
41. O'Malley AS, Forrest CB, Mandelblatt J. Adherence of low-income women to cancer screening recommendations. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:144-154.
42. Gierisch JM, O'Neill SC, Rimer BK, DeFrank JT, Bowling JM, Skinner CS. Factors associated with annual-interval mam-mography for women in their 40s. Cancer Epidemiol 2009; 33:72-78.
43. Peek ME, Han JH. Disparities in screening mammography. Current status, interventions and implications. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:184-194.
44. Borrayo EA, Jenkins SR. Feeling frugal: Socioeconomic sta-tus, acculturation, and cultural health beliefs among women of Mexican descent. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 2003;9:197-206.
45. Fiscella K, Franks P, Doescher MP, Saver BG. Disparities in health care by race, ethnicity, and language among the in-sured. Med Care 2002;40:52-59.
46. DeVoe JE, Fryer GE, Phillips R, Green L. Receipt of pre-ventive care among adults: Insurance status and usual source of care. Am J Public Health 2003;93:786-791.
47. Hedegaard HB, Davidson AJ, Wright RA. Factors associated with screening mammography in low-income women. Am J Prev Med 1996;12:51-56.
48. Sabatino SA, Coates RJ, Uhler RJ, Breen N, Tangka F, Shaw KM. Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race,ethnicity, income, and health in-surance status, 1993 and 2005. Med Care 2008;46:692-700.
49. Roetzheim RG, Pal N, Tennant C, et al. Effects of health insurance and race on early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1409-1415.
50. DuBard CA, Schmid D, Yow A, Rogers AB, Lawrence WW. Recommendation for and receipt of cancer screenings among Medicaid recipients 50 years and older. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:2014-2021.
51. Riley G, Potosky A, Lubitz J, Brown M. Stage of cancer at diagnosis for Medicare HMO and fee-for-service enrollees. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1598-1604.
52. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service (ERS). Measuring rurality: Rural-urban continuum codes (2004). Available at www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Rurality/RuralUrbCon/Accessed December 20, 2009.
53. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2008. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2008. Available at www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/ @nho/documents/document/2008cafffinalsecuredpdf.pdf Accessed August 23,2010.
54. Glass AG, Lacey JV Jr, Carreon JD, Hoover RN. Breast cancer incidence, 1980-2006: Combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1152-1161.
55. Katalinic A, Rawal R Decline in breast cancer incidence after decrease in utilisation of hormone replacement therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;107:427-430.
56. Ryerson AB, Miller JW, Eheman CR, Leadbetter S, White MC. Recent trends in U.S. mammography use from 2000-2006: A population-based analysis. Prev Med 2008;47: 477-482.
57. Welsh AL, Sauaia A, Jacobellis J, Min SJ, Byers T. The effect of two church-based interventions on breast cancer screen-ing rates among Medicaid-insured Latinas. Prev Chronic Dis 2005;2:A07
58. Kreher NE, Hickner JM, Ruffin MT 4th, Lin CS. Effect of distance and travel time on rural women's compliance with screening mammography: An UPRNet study. Upper Pe-ninsula Research Network. J Fam Pract 1995;40:143-147
59. Breast Screening Frequency Trial Group (BSFTG). The fre-quency of breast cancer screening: Results from the UKCCCR randomized trial. United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research. Eur J Cancer 2002;38:1458-1464.
60. Tang TS, Patterson SK, Roubidoux MA, Duan L. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening ad-herence. Psychooncology 2009;18:727-734.
61. Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: Re-sults of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93:1704-1713.
62. Clark MA, Rakowski W, Bonacore LB. Repeat mammogra-phy: Prevalence estimates and considerations for assess-ment. Ann Behav Med 2003;26:201-211.
63. Freeman JL, Klabunde CN, Schussler N, Warren JL, Virnig BA, Cooper GS. Measuring breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening with Medicare claims data. Med Care 2002; 40(Suppl 8):IV-36-42.
64. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources. The West Virginia 2010 Objectives. Available at www.wvdhhr.com/bph/hp2010/objective/3.htm Accessed De-cember 12, 2009.