Supreme Court of Canada Decision on the Assisted Human Reproduction Act Creates Urgent Need for Action

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 317-319

  Baylis, Françoise ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ACT; ASSISTED HUMAN REPRODUCTION ACT; CANADA; COURT; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; FEDERAL LEGISLATION; GENETIC INFORMATION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INFORMATION; JURISDICTION; LAW; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLICATION; WELLBEING; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 80051627468     PISSN: 17012163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34845-9     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Fisher J. Infertility and assisted reproduction. World Health Organization. Mental health aspects of women's reproductive health: a global review of the literature 2009, 128-146. WHO Press, Geneva.
2. Assisted Human Reproduction Act, S.C. 2004, c. 2 [AHR Act].
3. Canada. Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. Proceed with care: final report of the Royal Commission of New Reproductive Technologies. Ottawa: Minister of Government Services Canada;1993.
4. Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act, 2010 SCC 61.
5. Constitution Act, 1867, ss. 91, 92.
6. Baylis F. The regulation of assisted human reproductive technologies and related research: a public health, safety and morality argument. Expert opinion;August 2006.