The sacred and the absurd--an electrophysiological study of counterintuitive ideas (at sentence level)

Social Neuroscience

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 445-457

  Fondevila, Sabela ^a   Martín Loeches, Manuel ^a,b   Jiménez Ortega, Laura ^a,b   Casado, Pilar ^a,b   Sel, Alejandra ^a   Fernández Hernández, Anabel ^a   Sommer, Werner ^c  

^a INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Core knowledge; Minimally counterintuitive; N400; Religion; Semantics

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RELIGION; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; RELIGION; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864658885     PISSN: 17470919     EISSN: 17470927     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2011.641228     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Allen, L. A. 1975. Time before morning: Art and myth of the Australian Aborigines, New York, NY: Crowell.
2. American Electroencephalographic Society. 1991. Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 3: 38-42.
3. Anonymous. 1981. The Rig Veda, London, UK: Penguin Books.
4. Anonymous. 1982. The Kojiki. Records of Ancient Matters, Singapore: Tuttle.
5. Anonymous. 2008a. The Egyptian Book of the Dead. Or the papyrus of Ani, London, UK: Penguin Classics.
6. Anonymous. 2008b. Polpoh Vhu, Madrid, Spain: Trotta.
7. Atran, S. 2002. In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Baggio, G. and Hagoort, P. 2011. "The balance between memory and unification in semantics: A dynamic account of the N400". In Language and Cognitive Processes Vol. 26, 1338-1367.
9. Barrett, J. L. 2000. Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4: 29-34.
10. Barrett, J. L. 2004. Why would anyone believe in God?, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
11. Barrett, J. L. 2008. Coding and quantifying counterintuitiveness in religious concepts: Theoretical and methodological reflections. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 20: 308-338.
12. Barrett, J. L. and Nyhof, M. A. 2001. Spreading nonnatural concepts: The role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and transmission of cultural materials. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1: 69-100.
13. Boyer, P. 1994a. "Cognitive constraints on cultural representations: Natural ontologies and religious ideas". In Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in culture and cognition, Edited by: Hirschfeld, L. A. and Gelman, S. A. 391-411. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Boyer, P. 1994b. The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion, Berkeley, USA: University of California Press.
15. Boyer, P. 1998. "Cognitive aspects of religious ontologies: How brain processes constrain religious concepts". In Theory and method in the study of religion, Edited by: Alhbäck, T. 134-157. Abo, Finland: Donner Institute.
16. Boyer, P. 2001. Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought, New York, NY: Basic Books.
17. Boyer, P. 2003. Religious thought and behaviour as by-products of brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7: 119-124.
18. Boyer, P. and Bergstrom, B. 2008. Evolutionary perspectives on religion. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37: 111-113.
19. Boyer, P. and Ramble, C. 2001. Cognitive templates for religious concepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations. Cognitive Science, 25: 535-564.
20. Bulbulia, J. 2004. The cognitive and evolutionary psychology of religion. Biology and Philosophy, 19: 655-686.
21. Bulbulia, J. 2009. Charismatic signalling. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature, Culture, 3(4): 518-551.
22. Culotta, E. 2009. Origins. On the origin of religion. Science, 326: 784-787.
23. Dennett, D. 2006. Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon, New York, NY: Viking Press.
24. Federmeier, K. D. and Kutas, M. 1999. A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 31: 469-495.
25. García Noblejas, G. 2007. Mitología de la antigua China, Madrid, Spain: Alianza.
26. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. and Donchin, E. 1983. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55: 468-484.
27. Guthrie, S. 1993. Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion, New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
28. Hagoort, P., Baggio, G. and Willems, R.M. 2009. "Semantic unification". In The cognitive neurosciences, 4th, Edited by: Gazzaniga, R. M. 819-836. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M. and Petersson, K. M. 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304: 438-441.
30. Hald, L. A., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G. and Hagoort, P. 2007. The interaction of discourse context and world knowledge in online sentence comprehension: Evidence from the N400. Brain Research, 1146: 210-218.
31. Harris, S., Kaplan, J. T., Curiel, A., Bookheimer, S. Y., Iacoboni, M. and Cohen, M. S. 2009. The neural correlates of religious and nonreligious belief. PLoS ONE, 4: e0007272
32. Kapogiannis, D., Barbey, A. K., Su, M., Krueger, F. and Grafman, J. 2009. Neuroanatomical variability of religiosity. PLoS ONE, 4: e7180
33. Kapogiannis, D., Barbey, A. K., Su, M., Zamboni, G., Krueger, F. and Grafman, J. 2009. Cognitive and neural foundations of religious belief. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106: 4876-4881.
34. Kim, A. E. and Osterhout, L. 2005. The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52: 205-225.
35. Knappert, J. 1988. Reyes, dioses y espíritus de la mitología Africana, Anaya.
36. Kolk, H. H. J. and Chwilla, D. J. 2007. Late positivities in unusual situations. Brain and Language, 100(3): 257-261.
37. Kuperberg, G. R., Kreher, D. A., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D. and Holcomb, P. J. 2007. The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 100(3): 223-238.
38. Kutas, M. and Federmeier, K. D. 2000. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12): 463-470.
39. Kutas, M. and Federmeier, K. D. 2011. Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62: 621-647.
40. Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S. A. 1980. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207: 203-205.
41. Lau, E. F., Phillips, C. and Poeppel, D. 2008. A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9: 920-933.
42. Lindeman, M., Cederstrom, S., Simola, P., Simula, A., Ollikainen, S. and Riekki, T. 2008. Sentences with core knowledge violations increase the size of N400 among paranormal believers. Cortex, 44: 1307-1315.
43. Lisdorf, A. 2004. The spread of non-natural concepts. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4(1): 151-173.
44. Martin-Loeches, M., Nigbur, R., Casado, P., Hohlfeld, A. and Sommer, W. 2006. Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: A brain potential study of noun-adjective agreement in Spanish. Brain Research, 1093: 178-189.
45. Molinaro, N., Conrad, M., Barber, H. A. and Carreiras, M. 2009. On the functional nature of the N400: Contrasting effects related to visual word recognition and contextual semantic integration. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1: 1-7.
46. Nieuwland, M. S. and Van Berkum, J. J. 2006. When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18: 1098-1111.
47. Norenzayan, A. and Atran, S. 2004. "Cognitive and emotional processes in the cultural transmission of natural and nonnatural beliefs". In The psychological foundations of culture, Edited by: Schaller, M. and Crandall, C. 149-169. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
48. Norenzayan, A., Atran, S., Faulkner, J. and Schaller, M. 2006. Memory and mystery: The cultural selection of minimally counterintuitive narratives. Cognitive Science, 30: 1-23.
49. Oldfield, R. C. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9: 97-113.
50. Osterhout, L. and Holcomb, P. J. 1992. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31: 785-806.
51. Ovid. 2004. The metamorphoses, London, UK: Penguin Classics.
52. Poignant, R. 1967. Oceanic mythology: The myths of Polynesia, Micronesia, Melanesia, Australia, London, UK: Hamlyn.
53. Pyysiäinen, I. 2003. How religion works: Towards a new cognitive science of religion, Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
54. Pyysiäinen, I. and Hauser, M. 2010. The origin of religion: Evolved adaptation or by-product?. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14(3): 104-109.
55. Pyysiäinen, I., Lindeman, M. and Hakela, T. 2003. Counterintuitiveness as the hallmark of religiosity. Religion, 33: 341-355.
56. Resenberg, D. 2001. World mythology: An anthropology of great myths and epics, London, UK: MacGraw-Hill.
57. Sebastián, N., Cuetos, F., Martí, M. and Carreiras, M. 2000. LEXESP: Léxico informatizado del español. Ediciones de la Universidad de Barcelona Spain
58. Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
59. Van Berkum, J. J. A. 2010. The brain is a prediction machine that cares about good and bad -any implications for neuropragmatics?. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22: 181-208.
60. Van Berkum, J. J., Hagoort, P. and Brown, C. M. 1999. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11: 657-671.
61. Wade, N. 2006. Before the dawn: Recovering the lost history of our ancestors, New York, NY: Penguin.
62. Wilson, D. S. 2005. Testing major evolutionary hypotheses about religion with a random sample. Human Nature, 16(4): 419-446.