Talk to act: How Internet use empowers users to participate in collective actions offline

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7284 LNCS, Issue , 2012, Pages 79-89

  Schumann, Sandy ^a   Klein, Olivier ^a   Douglas, Karen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

anonymity; collective actions; psychological empowerment; social media

Indexed keywords

ANONYMITY; COLLECTIVE ACTION; IDENTIFIABILITY; INTERNET USE; OFFLINE; ONLINE INTERACTIVITY; PANEL DISCUSSIONS; PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT; REWARD SYSTEMS; SOCIAL MEDIA;

TECHNOLOGY;

INTERNET;

EID: 84864646036     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Postmes, T., Brunsting, S.: Collective Action in the Age of the Internet: Mass Communication and Online Mobilization. Social Science Computer Review 3, 290-301 (2002)
2. Boulianne, S.: Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis Research. Political Communication 26, 193-211 (2009)
3. Wright, S.C., Taylor, D.M., Moghaddam, F.M.: Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58, 994-1003 (1990)
4. Rafaeli, S., Ariel, Y.: Assessing Interactivity in Computer-Mediated Research. In: Joinson, A., McKenna, K., Postmes, T., Reips, U.-D. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of Internet Psychology, pp. 165-186. Oxford University Press, New York (2007)
5. Xenos, M., Moy, P.: Direct and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement. Journal of Communication 57, 704-718 (2007)
6. Van Laer, J., Van Aelst, P.: Cyber-protest and civil society: the Internet and action repertoires in social movements. In: Jewkes, Y., Yar, M. (eds.) Handbook of Internet Crime, pp. 230-254. Willian Publishing, Devon (2010)
7. Wall, M.: Social Movements and email: expressions of online identity in the globalization protests. New Media & Society 9, 258-277 (2007)
8. Norris, P., Jones, P.: Virtual Democracy. Harvard International Journal for Press/Politics 293, 474-480 (1998)
9. Bimber, B.: The Internet and Citizen Communication with Government. Does the Medium matter? Political Communication 16, 409-429 (1999)
10. Krueger, B.S.: Assessing the potential for Internet political participation in the United States: A resource approach. American Politics Research 30, 476-498 (2002)
11. Fisher, D.R., Boekkooi, M.: Mobilizing friends and strangers: Understanding the role of the internet in the Step IT UP day. Information, Communication & Society 2, 193-208 (2010)
12. Gil de Zúniga, H., Valenzuela, S.: The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement. Communication Research 10, 1-25 (2010)
13. Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360-1380 (1973)
14. Kavada, A.: Web 2.0 platforms and Political Communication: Conceptual and methodological challenges. In: Annual meeting of the International Association for Media and Communication Research (2010)
15. Spreitzer, G.: Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. Academy of Management Journal 5, 1442-1465 (1995)
16. Thomas, K.W., Velthouse, B.A.: Cognitive elements of empowerment. Academy of Management Review 15, 666-681 (1990)
17. Wallace, J.C., Johnson, P.D., Mathe, K., Paul, J.: Structural and Psychological empowerment Climates, Performance, and the Moderating Role of Shared Felt Accountability: A Managerial Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 4, 840-850 (2011)
18. Seibert, S.E., Wang, G., Courtright, S.H.: Antecedents and Consequences of Psychological and Team Empowerment in Organizations: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Applied Psychology 5, 981-1003 (2011)
19. Kantner, R.M.: The new Managerial work. Harvard Business Review 66, 85-92 (1989)
20. Reicher, S.D.: Collective action and the (re)construction of the self. In: Oosterwegel, A., Wicklund, R. (eds.) The self in European and North American Cultures: Development and Processes. Kluwer, Amsterdam (1994)
21. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., Wetherell, M.S.: Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Blackwell, Oxford (1987)
22. Spears, R., Lea, M.: Panacea or Panopticon?: The hidden Power in Computer-Mediated Communication. Communication Research 21, 427-459 (1994)
23. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lea, M.: Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 25, 689-715 (1998)
24. Leiner, D.J.: oFb - the online questionnaire (2011), https://www. soscisurvey.de
25. Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K.D.: The new environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education 9, 10-19 (1978)
26. Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., Kampmeier, C., Spahlinger, P.: Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, 646-658 (1998)
27. Krizan, Z., Baron, R.S.: Group polarization and choice-dilemmas: How important is self-categorization? European Journal of Social Psychology 37, 191-201 (2007)
28. Zimet, G., Dahlem, N., Zimet, S.G., Farley, G.: The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment 52, 30-41 (1988)
29. Lamm, H., Myers, D.B.: Group-induced polarization of attitudes and behavior. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 147-195. Academic Press, New York (1978)
30. Burnstein, E., Vinokur, A.: Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13, 315-332 (1977)
31. Petty, R.E., Krosnik, J.A.: Attitude strength: antecedents and consequences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1995)