Physical effect of work on healthy individuals: Implications for FCE testing

Work

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 233-239

  Kyi, Min Trevor ^a,b   Fischer, Jodi Ann ^a,b   Penner, Jaclyn ^c   Read, Jennifer A ^d   Backman, Catherine L ^b,e  

^a Functional Outcomes Rehabilitation Services Inc   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c Rehabilitation Unit   (Canada)

^d Orion Health Inc   (Canada)

^e ARTHRITIS RESEARCH CENTRE OF CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Disability; functional capacity evaluation; occupational therapy; vocational rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CANADA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DYNAMOMETER; ENDURANCE; FEMALE; FITNESS; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROTATOR CUFF; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; STATISTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; URBAN POPULATION; WALKING; WORK CAPACITY; WORKLOAD;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRITISH COLUMBIA; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE STRENGTH DYNAMOMETER; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; PHYSICAL ENDURANCE; PHYSICAL FITNESS; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROTATOR CUFF; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; TIME AND MOTION STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; URBAN POPULATION; WALKING; WORK CAPACITY EVALUATION; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84864621079     PISSN: 10519815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1346     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bechtol CO. Grip Test: The use of a Dynamometer with Adjustable Handle Spacings. J Bone Joint Surg Am.; 1954; 36:820-832.
2. Bellamy N, Sothern R, Campbell J and Buchanan W. Circadian rhythm in pain, stiffness, and manual dexterity in rheumatoid arthritis: Relation between discomfort and disability. Ann Rheum Dis 1991; 50:243-48.
3. BellamyN, SothernR,Campbell J and BuchananW. Rhythmic variations in pain, stiffness, and manual dexterity in hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61:1075-1080.
4. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology. Fitness Publications: Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire. Available from http://www.csep.ca. Accessed August 15, 2008.
5. Carrier J, Monk T. Circadian rhythms of performance: new trends. Chronobiol Int 2000; 17:719-32.
6. Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Hebert R, Bravo G. The Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test: Reliability, validity and reference values studies with healthy elderly people. Can J Occup Ther 1997; 64:270-76.
7. Gifford L. Circadian variation in human flexibility and grip strength. Australian J Physiotherapy 1987; 33:3-9.
8. Hamilton A. Grip strength testing reliability. J Hand Ther 1994; 7:163-170.
9. Innes E. Handgrip strength testing: A review of the literature. Aust Occup Ther J 1999; 46:120-40.
10. Lafayette Instrument Company. Complete Minnesota Dexterity Test: Test Administrators Manual; 1998.
11. McGarvey M. Reliability of isometric strength testing: Temporal factors and strength variation. Clinical Orthop Related R 1984; 185:185-301.
12. Marras WS, Wongsham PE. Flexibility and velocity of the normal and impaired lumbar spine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67:213-17.
13. Roy Matheson and Associates, The Matheson Functional Capacity Evaluation Certification Program Residency Manual, Keene, NH, Roy Matheson and Associates, 2010.
14. Mathiowetz V. Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength. Occup Ther Int 2002; 9:201-9.
15. Mathiowetz V. Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1985; 66:69-72.
16. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surgery 1984; 9:222-27.
17. Monk T, Buysse D, Reynolds C, Berga S, Jarrett D, Begley A, et al. Circadian rhythms in human performance and mood under constant conditions. J Sleep Res 1997; 6:9-18.
18. National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Occupational Classification and Analysis. Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT): Part I -Current Population Survey, April 1971, Augmented with DOT Characteristics, and Part II -Fourth edition Dictionary of DOT Scores for 1970 Census Categories 2003. Available from: Http://www.occupationalinfo.org/index.html. Accessed January 4, 2008.
19. Norman G, Streiner D. Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials. 2nd ed. Hamilton, ON: B.C. Decker Inc; 2000.
20. Novy D, Simmonds M, Olson S, Lee C, Jones C. Physical performance: Differences inmen andwomenwith andwithout low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80:195-8.
21. Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU,Westmaas M, Hoeken LNH. Test-Retest Reliability of Lifting and Carrying in a 2-day Functional Capacity Evaluation. J. Occup. Rehab 2002; 12: 269-275
22. Simmonds MJ, Olson SL, Jones S, Hussein T, Lee CE, Novy D, et al. Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine 1998; 23:2412-21.
23. Smeets R, Hijdra H, Kester A, Hitters M, Knottnerus J. The usability of six physical performance tasks in a rehabilitation population with chronic low back pain. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20:989-98.
24. Soer R, Gerrits E, Reneman MF. Test-retest reliability of a WRULD functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults. Work 2006; 26:273-80.
25. Surrey, LR, Nelson, K, Delelio, C, Mathie-Majors, D, Omel-Edwards, N, Shumaker, J, et al. A comparison of performance outcomes between theMinnesota rate ofmanipulation test and the Minnesota manual dexterity test. Work 2003; 20:97-102.
26. Young V. Fluctuation in grip and pinch strength among normal subjects. J Hand Surgery 1989; 14:125-9.