The usability of six physical performance tasks in a rehabilitation population with chronic low back pain

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 989-998

  Smeets, Rob J E M ^a   Hijdra, Helma J M ^a   Kester, Arnold D M ^b   Hitters, Minou W G C ^a   Knottnerus, J André ^c  

^a Rehabilitation Centre Blixembosch   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLIMBING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; REHABILITATION CENTER; SCORING SYSTEM; TASK PERFORMANCE; WALKING; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; EXERCISE TEST; MULTICENTER STUDY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 34250632346     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215506070698     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Simmonds MJ, Olson SL, Jones S et al. Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine 1998; 23: 2412-21.
2. Waddell G. A new clinical model of low back pain and disability. The back pain revolution. Churchill Livingstone, 1998.
3. Parks KA, Crichton KS, Goldford RJ, McGill SM. A comparison of lumbar range of motion and functional ability scores in patients with low back pain: assessment for range of motion validity. Spine 2003; 28: 380-84.
4. Wittink H. Functional capacity testing in patients with chronic pain. Clin J Pain 2005; 21: 197-99.
5. Newton M, Thow M, Somerville D, Henderson I, Waddell G. Trunk strength testing with isokinetic lifting-machines. Part 2: Experimental evaluation of the Cybec II back testing system in normal subjects and patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 1993; 18: 812-24.
6. Gibbons LE, Videman T, Crites Battié M. Determinants of isokinetic and psychophysical lifting strength and static back muscle endurance: a study of male monozygotic twins. Spine 1997; 23: 2412-21.
7. Kankaanpaa M, Taimela S, Laaksonen D, Hanninen O, Airaksinen O. Back and hip extensor fatigability in chronic low back pain patients and controls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 412-17.
8. Keller A, Hellesnes J, Brox JI. Reliability of the isokinetic trunk extensor test, Biering-Sorensen test, and Astrand bicycle test: assessment of intraclass correlation coefficient and critical difference in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy individuals. Spine 2001; 26: 771-77.
9. Harding VR, Williams AC, Richardson PH et al. The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients. Pain 1994; 58: 367-75.
10. Watson PJ. Non-psychological determinants of physical performance in musculoskeletal pain. In Mitchell M ed. Pain 1999-an updated review: Refresher course syllabus 9th World Congress on Pain. IASP Press, 1999: 153-58.
11. World Health Organization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), second edition. WHO, 2001.
12. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005; 113: 9-19.
13. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. Functional restoration for spinal disorders: the sports medicine approach. Lea & Febiger, 1988.
14. Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Groothoff JW, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13: 207-18.
15. Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Goeken LN. Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil 2002; 12: 269-75.
16. Mayer TG, Barnes D, Kishino ND et al. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. I. A standardized protocol and normative database. Spine 1988; 13: 993-97.
17. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Barnes D, Mayer H, Mooney V. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. Erratum notice. Spine 1990; 15: 5.
18. Ljungquist T, Harms Ringdahl K, Nygren A, Jensen I. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of an 11-test package for assessing dysfunction due to back or neck pain. Physiother Res Int 1999; 4: 214-32.
19. Strand LI, Moe Nilssen R, Ljunggren AE. Back Performance Scale for the assessment of mobility-related activities in people with back pain. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 1213-23.
20. Magnussen LMPT, Strand LIPPT, Lygren HMPT. Reliability and validity of the Back Performance Scale: observing activity limitation in patients with back pain. Spine 2004; 29: 903-907.
21. Smeets RJ, Vlaeyen JW, Hidding A et al. Active rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: cognitive-behavioral, physical, or both? First direct post-treatment results from a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN22714229]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 5.
22. Mayer TG, Barnes D, Nichols G et al. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. II. A comparison with isokinetic lifting in a disabled chronic low-back pain industrial population. Spine 1988; 13: 998-1002.
23. Novy DM, Simmonds MJ, Olson SL, Lee CE, Jones SC. Physical performance: differences in men and women with and without low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 195-98.
24. Lee CE, Simmonds MJ, Novy DM, Jones S. Self-reports and clinician-measured physical function among patients with low back pain: a comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 227-31.
25. Novy DM, Simmonds MJ, Lee CE. Physical performance tasks: what are the underlying constructs? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 44-47.
26. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 1983; 8: 141-44.
27. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-28.
28. Rankin G, Stokes M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 187-99.
29. Fleiss J. Reliability of measurement. In Fleiss J ed. Design and analysis of clinical experiments. John Wiley & Sous, 1986: 1-32.
30. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1(8476): 307-10.
31. Altman DG. Some common problems in medical research. In Altman DG ed. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, 1991: 396-403.
32. Lygren H, Dragesund T, Joensen J, Ask T, Moe Nilssen R. Test-retest reliability of the Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE). Spine 2005; 30: 1070-74.
33. Brouwer S, Kuijer W, Dijkstra PU, Goeken LN, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH. Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire: intra class correlation and limits of agreement. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 162-65.
34. Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 2000; 30: 1-15.