A comparison of performance outcomes between the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test and the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test

Work

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 97-102

  Surrey, Lynn R ^a   Nelson, Kimberly ^a   Delelio, Cheri ^a   Mathie Majors, Danielle ^a   Omel Edwards, Natasha ^a   Shumaker, Jack ^a   Thurber, Gretchen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INDIANAPOLIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Hand manipulation tests; Manual dexterity; Standardization procedures

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AIRPORT; COLLEGE STUDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FUNCTION TEST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOTOR COORDINATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; RANDOMIZATION; RATING SCALE; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNITED STATES; WORK CAPACITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; HAND; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; MOTOR SKILLS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY;

EID: 0037278923     PISSN: 10519815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. American Guidance Service, The Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Tests. Circle Pines, Minnesota, 1969.
2. P.L. Baxter-Petralia, L.A. Bruening, S.M. Blackmore and P.M. McEntee, Physical capacity evaluation, in: Rehabilitation of the Hand: Surgery and Therapy, 3rd ed., J.M. Hunter, L.H. Schneider, E.J. Mackin and A.D. Callahan, eds, St. Louis, Missouri, 1990.
3. J. Bear-Lehman and A.B. Colon, Evaluating the hand: Issues inreliability and validity, Phys Ther 69 (1989), 33-41.
4. S.M. Blackmore and L. Bruening-Reilly, Returning the hand-injured patient to work, in: Concepts in Hand Rehabilitation, B.G. Stanley and S.M. Tribuzi, Eds., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1992.
5. F. Chou, S. Sheen-Chen and C. Leong, Neuromuscular recovery afterparathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism, Surg 117 (1995), 18-25.
6. R.D. Drussel, Relationship of the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test with the industrial work performance of the adult cerebral palsied, Am J of Occup Th 13 (1959), 93-96, 105.
7. I.L. Elfant, Correlation between kinesthetic discrimination and manual dexterity, Am J of Occup Th 31 (1995), 23-28.
8. F.E. Ewing, Hand rehabilitation, in: Willard & Spackman's Occupational Therapy, 8th ed., H. Hopkins and H. Smith, eds, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1993.
9. D.S. Gloss and M.G. Wardle, Use of the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test for disability evaluation, Percept and Motor Skills 55 (1982), 527-532.
10. W.S. Husak and R.A. Magill, Correlations among perceptual-motor ability, self-concept and reading achievement in early elementary grades, Percept and Motor Skills 48 (1979), 447-450.
11. Lafayette Instrument Company, The Complete Minnesota Dexterity Test Examiner's Manual. Lafayette, Indiana, 1991.
12. R.J. Mandell, D.L. Nelson and S.A. Cermak, Differential laterality of hand function in right-handed and left-handed boys, Am J of Occup Ther 38 (1984), 114-120.
13. University of Nebraska Press, Tests in Print, Vol. 1, L.L. Murphy, J.C. Conolex, and J.C. Impara, Eds,. Lincoln, Nebraska, 1994.
14. D.F. Ortega, Relaxation exercises with cerebral palsied adults showing spasticity, J of App Beh Analysis (1978), 447-451.
15. E. Spencer, Hand rehabilitation, in: Willard & Spackman's Occupational Therapy, 8th ed., H. Hopkins and H. Smith, eds, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1993.
16. P.A. Totten and S. Flinn-Wagner, Functional evaluation, in: Philadelphia, B.G. Stanley and S.M. Tribuzi, S.M., eds, Pennsylvania, 1992.
17. C.A. Trombly, Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction, 4th ed., Baltimore, Maryland, 1995.