Matching the anatomy with the technique and vascular approach in carotid artery stenting. The role of systematic multidetector CT angiography

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 339-342

  Montorsi, Piero ^a   Galli, Stefano ^a   Ravagnani, Paolo M ^a   Bartorelli, Antonio L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA ARCH; BRAIN CIRCULUS ARTERIOSUS; CAROTID ARTERY BIFURCATION; CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CONGENITAL BLOOD VESSEL MALFORMATION; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; FEMALE; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; STENT; THORACIC AORTA;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; AORTA, THORACIC; CAROTID ARTERY, INTERNAL; CAROTID STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; STENTS; VASCULAR MALFORMATIONS;

EID: 84864545083     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: 15451550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/11-3730C.1     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. Levy EI, Mocco J, Samuelson RM, et al. Optimal treatment of carotid artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:979-985. (Pubitemid 351343802)
2. Schneider PA, Kasirajan K. Difficult anatomy: what characteristics are critical to good outcomes of either CEA or CAS? Semin Vasc Surg. 2007;20:216-225. (Pubitemid 350235863)
3. Faggioli GL, Ferri M, Freyrie A, et al. Aortic arch anomalies are associated with increased risk of neurological events in carotid stent procedures. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33:436-441. (Pubitemid 46336601)
4. U-King-Im J, Young V, Gillard JH. Carotid-artery imaging in the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:569-580.
5. Tholen AT, de Monyé C, Genders TS, et al. Suspected carotid artery stenosis: cost-effectiveness of CT angiography in work-up of patients with recent TIA or minor ischemic stroke. Radiology. 2010;256:585-597.
6. Berko NS, Jain VR, Godelman A, et al. Variants and anomalies of thoracic vasculature on computed tomographic angiography in adults. J Computed Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:523-528.
7. Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Valentine RJ, et al. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:257-264. (Pubitemid 47102089)
8. Wyers MC, Powell RJ, Fillinger MF, et al. The value of 3D-CT angiographic assessment prior to carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:614-622.
9. Choi HM, Hobson RW, Goldstein J, et al. Technical challenges in a program of carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:746-751. (Pubitemid 39311643)
10. Shaw JA, Gravereaux EC, Eisenhauer AC. Carotid stenting in the bovine arch. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;60:566-569. (Pubitemid 37466772)
11. Montorsi P, Galli S, Ravagnani P, et al. Carotid stenting through the right brachial approach for left internal carotid artery stenosis and bovine aortic arch configuration. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2009-2015.
12. Ventoruzzo G, Biondi-Zoccai G, Maioli F, et al. A tailored approach to overcoming challenges of a bovine aortic arch during left internal carotid artery stenting. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19:329-338.
13. Kiemeneij F, Laarmsan GJ, Oderkerken D, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the Access study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1269-2375.