Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 257-264

  Timaran, Carlos H ^a   Rosero, Eric B ^a   Valentine, R James ^a   Modrall, J Gregory ^a   Smith, Stephen ^a   Clagett, G Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; CAROTID ARTERIOGRAPHY; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENT; STROKE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ANGIOPLASTY; AORTA, THORACIC; CAROTID ARTERIES; CAROTID STENOSIS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34547096283     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.03.051     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Hessel S.J., Adams D.F., and Abrams H.L. Complications of angiography. Radiology 2 (1981) 273-281
2. Enochs W.S., Ackerman R.H., Kaufman J.A., and Candia M. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries. J Neuroimaging 4 (1998) 185-190
3. Scarabino T., Carriero A., Giannatempo G.M., Marano R., De M.P., Bonomo L., et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of the carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). J Neuroradiol 2 (1999) 87-91
4. Randoux B., Marro B., Koskas F., Duyme M., Sahel M., Zouaoui A., et al. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology 1 (2001) 179-185
5. Hathout G.M., Duh M.J., and El-Saden S.M. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: linear regression analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 9 (2003) 1747-1756
6. Anzalone N., Scomazzoni F., Castellano R., Strada L., Righi C., Politi L.S., et al. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Radiology 1 (2005) 204-213
7. Veith F.J., Amor M., Ohki T., Beebe H.G., Bell P.R.F., Bolia A., et al. Current status of carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders. J Vasc Surg 2 (2001) S111-S116
8. Ohki T., Veith F.J., Grenell S., Lipsitz E.C., Gargiulo N., Mckay J., et al. Initial experience with cerebral protection devices to prevent embolization during carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 6 (2002) 1175-1185
9. Ohki T., Roubin G.S., Veith F.J., Iyer S.S., and Brady E. Efficacy of a filter device in the prevention of embolic events during carotid angioplasty and stenting: An ex vivo analysis. J Vasc Surg 6 (1999) 1034-1042
10. Yadav J.S., Wholey M.H., Kuntz R.E., Fayad P., Katzen B.T., Mishkel G.J., et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 15 (2004) 1493-1501
11. Ringleb P.A., Allenberg J., Bruckmann H., Eckstein H.H., Fraedrich G., Hartmann M., et al. 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 9543 (2006) 1239-1247
12. Mas J.L., Chatellier G., Beyssen B., Branchereau A., Moulin T., Becquemin J.P., et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 16 (2006) 1660-1671
13. Hobson R.W. CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial): background, design, and current status. Semin Vasc Surg 2 (2000) 139-143
14. Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST - 2). MRC asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST) collaborative group. http://www.acst.org.uk/index.htm. Accessed December 30, 2006.
15. Lin P.H., Bush R.L., Peden E.K., Zhou W., Guerrero M., Henao E.A., et al. Carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection: assessing the learning curve and treatment outcome. Am J Surg 6 (2005) 850-857
16. Verzini F., Cao P., De R.P., Parlani G., Maselli A., Romano L., et al. Appropriateness of learning curve for carotid artery stenting: an analysis of periprocedural complications. J Vasc Surg 6 (2006) 1205-1211
17. Yadav J.S., Roubin G.S., King P., Iyer S., and Vitek J. Angioplasty and stenting for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Initial experience. Stroke 11 (1996) 2075-2079
18. Ouriel K., Hertzer N.R., Beven E.G., O'hara P.J., Krajewski L.P., Clair D.G., et al. Preprocedural risk stratification: identifying an appropriate population for carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg 4 (2001) 728-732
19. Ohki T., Timaran C.H., and Yadav J.S. Technique of Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting. In: Moore W.S. (Ed). Vascular and endovascular surgery: a comprehensive review. 7th ed. (2006), Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, Pa 355-382
20. Gray W.A., Hopkins L.N., Yadav S., Davis T., Wholey M., Atkinson R., et al. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg 2 (2006) 258-268
21. Taylor D.W. Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis. N Engl J Med 7 (1991) 445-453
22. Huston J., Nichols D.A., Luetmer P.H., Rydberg C.H., Lewis B.D., Meyer F.B., et al. MR angiographic and sonographic indications for endarterectomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2 (1998) 309-315
23. Myla S.V. Carotid access techniques: an algorithmic technique. Carotid Interv (2001) 2-12
24. Lin S.C., Trocciola S.M., Rhee J., Dayal R., Chaer R., Morrissey N.J., et al. Analysis of anatomic factors and age in patients undergoing carotid angioplasty and stenting. Ann Vasc Surg 6 (2005) 798-804
25. Setacci C., de D.G., Chisci E., Setacci F., Pieraccini M., Cappelli A., et al. Is carotid artery stenting in octogenarians really dangerous?. J Endovasc Ther 3 (2006) 302-309
26. Johnston D.C., Eastwood J.D., Nguyen T., and Goldstein L.B. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid arteries: utility in routine clinical practice. Stroke 12 (2002) 2834-2838
27. Serfaty J.M., Chirossel P., Chevallier J.M., Ecochard R., Froment J.C., and Douek P.C. Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2 (2000) 455-463
28. Mitra D., Connolly D., Jenkins S., English P., Birchall D., Mandel C., et al. Comparison of image quality, diagnostic confidence and interobserver variability in contrast enhanced MR angiography and 2D time of flight angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis. Br J Radiol 939 (2006) 201-207
29. The Value of 3D-CT Angiographic Assessment Prior to Carotid Stenting. Available at: http://www.vascularweb.org/CONTRIBUTIONPAGES/AnnualMeeting/Abstracts/2006/WyersTheValueof3D-CTAngiographicAssessment.html. Accessed January 8, 2007.
30. Chewning R.H., and Murphy K.J. Gadolinium-based contrast media and the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with renal insufficiency. J Vasc Interv Radiol 3 (2007) 331-333
31. Hammer F.D., Lacroix V., Duprez T., Grandin C., Verhelst R., Peeters A., et al. Cerebral microembolization after protected carotid artery stenting in surgical high-risk patients: results of a 2-year prospective study. J Vasc Surg 5 (2005) 847-853
32. Hatsukami T.S., Ferguson M.S., Beach K.W., Gordon D., Detmer P., Burns D., et al. Carotid plaque morphology and clinical events. Stroke 1 (1997) 95-100