Copy number variations (CNVs) in human pluripotent cell-derived neuroprogenitors

Gene

Volumn 506, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 377-379

  Corrales, Nestor L Lopez ^a   Mrasek, Kristin ^b   Voigt, Martin ^b   Liehr, Thomas ^b   Kosyakova, Nadezda ^b  

^a CnPQ Fellowship ^*  (Brazil)

^b JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH); Copy number variations (CNVs); Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC); Neuroprogenitor cell lines (NPC)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHROMOSOME 14Q; CHROMOSOME 15Q; CHROMOSOME 5Q; CHROMOSOME 6Q; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NEURAL STEM CELL; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; GENE DOSAGE; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; KARYOTYPING; MODELS, GENETIC; NEURONS; SCHIZOPHRENIA;

EID: 84864540769     PISSN: 03781119     EISSN: 18790038     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Amps K., et al. The International Stem Cell Initiative. (2011).Screening ethnically diverse human embryonic stem cells identifies a chromosome 20 minimal amplicon conferring growth advantage. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29:1132-1144.
2. Cahan P., Li Y., Izumi M., Graubert T.A. The impact of copy number variation on local gene expression in mouse hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41:430-437.
3. Catalina P., et al. Human ESCs predisposition to karyotypic instability: is a matter of culture adaptation or differential vulnerability among hESC lines due to inherent properties?. Mol. Cancer 2008, 7:76.
4. Chang C.C., et al. Genomic profiling of plasmablastic lymphoma using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH): revealing significant overlapping genomic lesions with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2009, 2:47.
5. Choy K.W., Setlur S.R., Lee C., Lau T.K. The impact of human copy number variation on a new era of genetic testing. BJOG 2010, 117:391-398.
6. Cook E.H., Scherer S.W. Copy-number variations associated with neuropsychiatric conditions. Nature 2008, 455:919-923.
7. Dahl J.A., et al. Genetic and epigenetic instability of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells expanded in autologous serum or fetal bovine serum. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2008, 52:1033-1042.
8. De Temmerman N., et al. CTG repeat instability in a human embryonic stem cell line carrying the myotonic dystrophy type 1 mutation. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2008, 14:405-412.
9. Dereli-Öz A., Versini G., Halazonetis T.D. Studies of genomic copy number changes in human cancers reveal signatures of DNA replication stress. Mol. Oncol. 2011, 5:308-314.
10. Elliott A.M., Elliott K.A., Kammesheidt A. High resolution array-CGH characterization of human stem cells using a stem cell focused microarray. Mol. Biotechnol. 2010, 46:234-342.
11. Fraga A.M., et al. Establishment of a Brazilian line of human embryonic stem cells in defined medium: implications for cell therapy in an ethnically diverse population. Cell Transplant. 2011, 20:431-440.
12. Ghadimi B.M., et al. Centrosome amplification and instability occurs exclusively in aneuploid, but not in diploid colorectal cancer cell lines, and correlates with numerical chromosomal aberrations. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000, 27:183-190.
13. Gore A., et al. Somatic coding mutations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2011, 471:63-67.
14. Grozeva D., et al. Independent estimation of the frequency of rare CNVs in the UK population confirms their role in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2012, 135:1-7.
15. Hussein S.M., et al. Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency. Nature 2011, 471:58-62.
16. Imreh M.P., et al. In vitro culture conditions favoring selection of chromosomal abnormalities in human ES cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2006, 99:508-516.
17. Inzunza J., et al. Comparative genomic hybridization and karyotyping of human embryonic stem cells reveals the occurrence of an isodicentric X chromosome after long-term cultivation. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2004, 10:461-466.
18. Kirov G., et al. De novo CNV analysis implicates specific abnormalities of postsynaptic signalling complexes in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 2012, 17:142-153.
19. Laurent L.C., et al. Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8:106-180.
20. Liang Q., Conte N., Skarnes W.C., Bradley A. Extensive genomic copy number variation in embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:17453-17456.
21. Martins-Taylor K., Xu R.H. Concise review: genomic stability of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 2012, 30:22-27.
22. Martins-Taylor K., et al. Recurrent copy number variations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29:488-491.
23. Mkrtchyan H., et al. The human genome puzzle-the role of copy number variation in somatic mosaicism. Curr. Genomics 2010, 11:426-431.
24. Mkrtchyan H., et al. Early embryonic chromosome instability results in stable mosaic pattern in human tissues. PLoS One 2010, 95:e9591.
25. Närvä E., et al. High-resolution DNA analysis of human embryonic stem cell lines reveals culture-induced copy number changes and loss of heterozygosity. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:371-377.
26. Paulsen, B.D., et al., (in press). Altered oxygen metabolism associated to neurogenesis of induced pluripotent stem cells derived from a schizophrenic patient. Cell Transplant.
27. Persson F., et al. High-resolution genomic profiling of adenomas and carcinomas of the salivary glands reveals amplification, rearrangement, and fusion of HMGA2. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2009, 48:69-82.
28. Piotrowski A., et al. Somatic mosaicism for copy number variation in differentiated human tissues. Hum. Mutat. 2008, 29:1118-1124.
29. Redon R., et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 2006, 444:444-454.
30. Scherer S.W., et al. Challenges and standards in integrating surveys of structural variation. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39:S7-S15.
31. Spits C., et al. Recurrent chromosomal abnormalities in human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26:1361-1363.
32. Taapken S.M., et al. Karotypic abnormalities in human induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29:313-314.
33. Thomson J.A., Marshall V.S. Primate embryonic stem cells. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 1998, 38:133-165.
34. Thomson J.A., Marshall V.S., Trojanowski J.Q. Neural differentiation of rhesus embryonic stem cells. APMIS 1998, 106:149-156.
35. van der Veken L.T., et al. Low grade mosaic for a complex supernumerary ring chromosome 18 in an adult patient with multiple congenital anomalies. Mol. Cytogenet. 2010, 3:13.
36. Weise A., et al. Microdeletion and microduplication syndromes. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2012, 60:346-358.