Use of Multiparametric MR with Neurovascular Bundle Evaluation to Optimize the Oncological and Functional Management of Patients Considered for Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy

Journal of Sexual Medicine

Volumn 9, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 2157-2166

  Panebianco, Valeria ^a   Salciccia, Stefano ^a   Cattarino, Susanna ^a   Minisola, Francesco ^a   Gentilucci, Alessandro ^a   Alfarone, Andrea ^a   Ricciuti, Gian Piero ^a   Marcantonio, Andrea ^a   Lisi, Danilo ^a   Gentile, Vincenzo ^a   Passariello, Roberto ^a   Sciarra, Alessandro ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Erctile Dysfunction; Multiparametric MRI; Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy; Prostate Cancer

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERNATIONAL INDEX OF ERECTILE FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVE SPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PENIS ERECTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

EID: 84864528585     PISSN: 17436095     EISSN: 17436109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02794.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Lee SE, Hong SK, Han JH, Han BK, Yu JH, Jeong SJ, Byunn SS, Lee HJ. Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2007;69:510-4.
2. Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T, Tomita K, Yonemasu H, Nakamura M, Oda Y, Naito S, Hasegawa Y. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: A histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2004;34:463-8.
3. Hricak H, Wang L, Wei DC, Coakley FV, Akin O, Reuter VE, Gonen M, Kattan MW, Onyebuchi CN, Scardino PT. The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 2004;100:2655-63.
4. McNeal JE. Cancer volume and site of origin of adenocarcinoma in the prostate: Relationship to local and distant spread. Hum Pathol 1992;23:258-66.
5. Rosen MA, Goldstone L, Lapin S, Wheeler T, Scardino PT. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1992;148:331-7.
6. Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, Mottet N, Schmid H-P, van der Kwast T, Wiegel T, Zattoni F. EAU guidelines 2011 on the prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis and treatment of clinically localized disease. Urology 2011;59:61-71.
7. Sciarra A, Barentsz J, Bjartell A, Easthman J, Hricak H, Panebianco V, Witjes JA. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging: How they are changing the management of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2011;59:962-77.
8. Sciarra A, Panebianco V, Salciccia S, Alfarone A, Gentilucci A, Lisi D, Passariello R, Gentile V. Use of 3D T2-weighted MR sequence for the assessment of neurovascular bundle changes after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP): A potential diagnostic tool for optimal management of erectile dysfunction after RRP. J Sex Med 2009;6:1430-7.
9. Han M, Partin AW. Nomograms for clinically localized prostate cancer. Part I: Radical prostatectomy. Semin Urol Oncol 2002;20:123-30.
10. Sciarra A, Cristini C, Von Heland M, Salciccia S, Gentile V. Randomized trial comparing an anterograde versus a retrograde approach to open radical prostatectomy: Results in terms of positive margin rate. Can Urol Assoc J. 2010;4:192-8.
11. Budäus L, Isbarn H, Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Haese H, Steuber T, Salomon G, Huland H, Graefen M. Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2009;56:317-24.
12. Sciarra A, Salciccia S, Panebianco V. Proton spectroscopic and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance: A modern approach in prostate cancer imaging. Eur Urol 2008;54:485-8.
13. Weinreb JC, Blume JD, Coakley FV, Wheeler TM, Cormack JB, Sotto CK, Cho H, Kawashima A, Tempany-Afdhal CM, Macura KJ, Rosen M, Gerst SR, Kurhanewicz J, etal. Prostate cancer: Sextant localization at MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging before prostatectomy-results of ACRIN prospective multi-institutional clinicopathologic study. Radiology 2009;251:122-33.
14. Labanaris AP, Zugor V, Takriti S, Smiszek R, Engelhard K, Nutzel R, Kuhn R. The role of conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision of whether to preserve or resect the neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2009;43:25-31.
15. Ogura K, Maekawa S, Okubo K, Aoki Y, Okada T, Oda K, Watanabe Y, Tsukayama C, Arai Y. Dynamic endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for local staging and detection of neurovascular bundle involvement of prostate cancer: Correlation with histopathologic results. Urology 2001;57:721-6.
16. Brown JA, Rodin DM, Harisinghani M, Dahl DM. Impact of preoperative MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate. Urol Oncol 2009;27:174-9.
17. Briganti A, Gallina A, Suardi N, Capitanio U, Tutolo M, Bianchi M, Passoni N, Salonia A, Colombo R, Di Girolamo V, Guazzoni G, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Predicting erectile function recovery after bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: A proposal of a novel preoperative risk stratification. J Sex Med 2010;7:2521-31. Epub 2010 May 4.
18. Ko WJ, Truesdale MD, Hruby GW, Landman J, Badani KK. Impacting factors for recovery of erectile function within 1 year following robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2011;8:1805-12.
19. Moskovic DJ, Alphs H, Nelson CJ, Rabbani F, Eastham J, Touijer K, Guillonneau B, Scardino PT, Mulhall JP. Subjective characterization of nerve sparing predicts recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy: Defining the utility of a nerve sparing grading system. J Sex Med 2011;8:255-60.