Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 174-179

  Brown, James A ^a   Rodin, David M ^b   Harisinghani, Mukesh ^b   Dahl, Douglas M ^b  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Endorectal MRI; Laparoscopic prostatectomy; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Nerve sparing; Neurovascular bundle sparing; Positive margins; Prostatectomy; Surgical margins

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY;

ADULT; AGED; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEURONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTUM;

EID: 61649104605     PISSN: 10781439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Walsh P.C., Epstein J.I., and Lowe F.C. Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle. J Urol 138 (1987) 823-827
2. Cangiano T.G., Litwin M.S., Naitoh J., et al. Intraoperative frozen section monitoring of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 162 (1999) 655-658
3. Katz R., Salomon L., Hoznek A., et al. Patient reported sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 168 (2002) 2078-2082
4. Hernandez D.J., Epstein J.I., Trock B.J., et al. Radical retropubic prostatectomy. How often do experienced surgeons have positive surgical margins when there is extraprostatic extension in the region of the neurovascular bundle?. J Urol 173 (2005) 446-449
5. Ward J.F., Zincke H., Bergstralh E.J., et al. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 172 (2004) 328-332
6. Kamat A.M., Jacobsohn K.M., Troncoso P., et al. Validation of criteria used to predict extraprostatic cancer extension: A tool for use in selecting patients for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 174 (2005) 1262-1265
7. Shah O., Robbins D.A., Melamed J., et al. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 169 (2003) 2147-2152
8. Viadya A., Hawke C., Tiguert R., et al. Intraoperative T staging in radical retropubic prostatectomy: Is it reliable?. Urology 57 (2001) 949-954
9. Park E.L., Dalkin B., Escobar C., et al. Site-specific positive margins at radical prostatectomy: Assessing cancer-control benefits of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle on a side with cancer on biopsy. BJU Int 91 (2003) 219-222
10. Arai Y., Kanamaru H., Moroi S., et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: Local tumor extension and prognosis. Int J Urol 3 (1996) 373-378
11. Goharderakhshan R.Z., Sudilovsky D., Carroll L.A., et al. Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy. Urology 59 (2002) 709-714
12. Bernstein M.R., Cangiano T., D'Amico A., et al. Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging and clinicopathology findings in T1c adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Urol Oncol 5 (2000) 104-107
13. Cornud F., Hamida K., Flam T., et al. Endorectal color Doppler sonography and endorectal MR imaging features of nonpalpable prostate cancer: Correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175 (2000) 1161-1168
14. May F., Treumann T., Dettmar P., et al. Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 87 (2001) 66-69
15. Hricak H., Wang L., Wei D.C., et al. The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 100 (2004) 2655-2663
16. Horiguchi A., Nakashima J., Horiguchi Y., et al. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate 56 (2003) 23-29
17. Nakashima J., Tanimoto A., Imai Y., et al. Endorectal MRI for prediction of tumor site, tumor size, and local extension of prostate cancer. Urology 64 (2004) 101-105
18. Cornud F., Flam T., Chauveinc L., et al. Extraprostatic spread of clinically localized prostate cancer: Factors predictive of pT3 tumor and of positive endorectal MR imaging examination results. Radiology 224 (2002) 203-210
19. Ukimura O., Gill I.S., Desai M.M., et al. Real-time transrectal ultrasonography during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 172 (2004) 112-118
20. Ukimura O., and Gill I.S. Real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Pictorial essay. J Urol 175 (2006) 1311-1319
21. Tewari A., Takenaka A., Matui E., et al. The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: Importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 98 (2006) 314-323