Proton Spectroscopic and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance: A Modern Approach in Prostate Cancer Imaging

European Urology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 485-488

  Sciarra, Alessandro ^a   Salciccia, Stefano ^a   Panebianco, Valeria ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INVASION; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER THERAPY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE; ECHOGRAPHY; EDITORIAL; FOLLOW UP; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROTON SPECTROSCOPY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT PLANNING; TUMOR BIOPSY;

CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MALE; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PROTONS; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 47949123903     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.032     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Hricak H. MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging in the pre-treatment evaluation of prostate cancer. Br J Radiol 78 (2005) 103-111
2. Sciarra A., Panebinanco V., Salciccia S., et al. Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 54 (2008) 589-600
3. Kirkham A.P.S., Emberton M., and Allen C. How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate?. Eur Urol 50 (2006) 1163-1175
4. Anastasiadis A.G., Lichy M.P., Nagele U., et al. MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur Urol 50 (2006) 738-749
5. Rajesh A., Coakley F.V., and Khrhanewicz J. 3D spectroscopic imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 62 (2007) 921-929
6. Kurhanewicz J., Vigneron D.B., Hricak H., Navayan P., Carroll P., and Nelson S.I. Three-dimensional 1H MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high spatial resolution. Radiology 198 (1996) 795-805
7. Rajesh A., and Coakley F.V. MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 12 (2004) 557-579
8. Zakian K.L., Sircan K., and Hricak H. Correlation of proton MR spectroscopic imaging with Gleason score grade based on step-section pathology after radical prostatectomy. Radiology 234 (2005) 804-814
9. Coakley F.V., The H.S., and Qayyum A. Endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiation therapy: preliminary experience. Radiology 233 (2004) 441-448
10. Mullerad M., Hricak H., and Kuroiwa K. Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer. J Urol 174 (2005) 2158-2163