Quick anomaly detection by the Newcomb-Benford Law, with applications to electoral processes data from the USA, Puerto Rico and Venezuela

Statistical Science

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 502-516

  Pericchi, Luis ^a   Torres, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO   (Puerto Rico)

Author keywords

Bayes Factors; Election forensics; Electronic elections; Newcomb Benford Second Digit Law 2BL; P value corrections; Quick anomaly detection; Restricted Newcomb Benford Law; Universal lower bound

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864509699     PISSN: 08834237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1214/09-STS296     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BENFORD, F. (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 78 551-572.
2. BERGER, J. O. and PERICCHI, L. R. (2001). Objective Bayesian methods for model selection: Introduction and comparison (with discussion). In Model Selection 135-207. IMS, Beachwood, OH. MR2000753
3. BUTTORFF, G. (2008). Detecting fraud in America's gilded age. Technical report, Univ. Iowa.
4. THE CARTER CENTER (2005). Observing the Venezuela Presidential Recall Referendum. http://www.cartercenter.org/documents/2020.pdf Comprehensive Report. Feb. 2005.
5. The Economist. Feb. 24th-March 2nd, 2007. Pages 93-94. Political Science: Election forensics. http://www.economist.com/science/
6. HILL, T. (1995). Base-invariance implies Benford's law. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 123 887-895. MR1233974
7. HILL, T. (1996). A statistical derivation of the Significant-Digit Law. Statist. Sci. 10 354-363. MR1421567
8. MEBANE, W. R. (2006). Election Forensics: The Second-digit Benford's Law Test and Recent American Presidential Elections. Election Fraud Conference, Salt Lake Ciy, Utah, September 29-30.
9. MEBANE, W. R. (2007a). Statistics for Digits. 2007 Summer Meeting of the Political Methodology Society, Pennsylvania State Univ., July 18-21.
10. MEBANE, W. R. (2007b). Evaluating voting systems to improve and verify accuracy. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American. Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, Feb. 16, 2007. Available at http://em.fis.unam.mx/~mochan/elecciones/paperMebane.pdf.
11. NEWCOMB S. (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the Different Digits in Natural Numbers. Amer. J. Math. 4 39-40. MR1505286
12. NIGRINI, M. (1995). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford's Law. J. Amer. Taxation Assoc. 18 72-91.
13. PERICCHI, L. R. and TORRES, D. (2004). La Ley de Newcomb-Benford y sus aplicaciones al Referendum Revocatorio en Venezuela. Reporte Técnico no-definitivo 2a, Octubre 01, 2004. Presented on Sept. 23, 2004 on the Third Universidad Simon Bolivar Seminar on: Statistical Analyses of the Venezuelan Recall Referendum. Available at https://sites.google.com/a/upr.edu/probability-and-statistics/home/techical-reports.
14. PIETRONERO, L., TOSATTI, E. and VESPIGNANI, A. (2001). Explaining the uneven distribution of numbers in nature: The Laws of Benford and Zipf. Physica A 293 297-304.
15. RAIMI, R. (1976). The first digit problem. Amer. Math. Monthly 102 322-327. MR0410850
16. SELLKE, T., BAYARRI, M. J. and BERGER, O. J. (2001). Calibration of p-values for testing precise null hypotheses. Amer. Statist. 55 62-71. MR1818723
17. TAYLOR, J. (2005). Too many ties? An empirical analysis of the Venezuelan recall referendum counts. Technical report.
18. TAYLOR, J. (2009). Too many ties? An empirical analysis of the Venezuelan recall referendum counts. Statist. Sci. To appear.
19. TORRES NÚÑEZ D. A. (2006). Newcomb-Benford's Law Applications to Electoral Processes, Bioinformatics, and the Stock Index. Supervised by L. R. Pericchi. May 2006. MS thesis.
20. TORRES, J., FERNANDEZ, S., GAMERO, A. AND SOLA, A. (2007). How do numbers begin? (the first digit law). Eur. J. Phys. 28 L17-L25.