Assessment of pan-sharpening methods applied to image fusion of remotely sensed multi-band data

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 165-175

  Yuhendra, ^a,b   Alimuddin, Ilham ^a,c   Sumantyo, Josaphat Tetuko Sri ^a   Kuze, Hiroaki ^a  

^a CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Padang Institute of Technology   (Indonesia)

^c Hasanudin University   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Fusion methods; Image quality; Noised based metric; Pan sharpening; SVM

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; GAUSSIAN METHOD; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RESOLUTION; PANCHROMATIC IMAGE; POISSON RATIO; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUICKBIRD; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

EID: 84864502741     PISSN: 15698432     EISSN: 1872826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2012.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Acerbi, F.W., Clevers, J.G.P.W., Schaepman, M.E., 2006. The assessment of multisensor image fusion using wavelet transform for mapping the Brazalian Savana. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinform. 8, 278-288.
2. Al-amri, S.S., Kalyankar, N.V., Khamitkar, S.D., 2010. A comparative study of removal noise from remote sensing image. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues 7 (1), 32-36.
3. Andrea, G., Filippo, N., 2007. Pan sharpening of remote sensing images using a multi scale Kalman filter. J. Pattern Recogn. Soc. 40, 3568-3577.
4. Bovolo, F., Bruzzone, L., Capobianco, L., Garzelli, A., Marchesi, S., 2010. Analysis of effect of pan-sharpening in change detection. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 7 (1), 53-57.
5. Bradley, A.P., 1997. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recogn. 30 (7), 1145.
6. Canga, E.F., Nikolov, S.G., Canagarajah, C.N., Bull, D.R., Dixon, T.D., Noyes, J.M., Troscianko, T., 2005. Characterisation of image fusion quality metric for surveillance application over band limited channels. In: Proc. 8th Int. Symp. Geoscience Remote Sensing, 25-28 July, Waterfall Solutions, UK, pp. 484-490.
7. Chavez, P.S., Berlin, G.L., Sowers, L.B., 1982. Statistical method for selecting Landsat MSS ratios. J. Appl. Photogr. Eng. 8, 23-30.
8. Choi, M., 2006. A new intensity-hue-saturation fusion approach to image fusion with a tradeoff parameter. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44, 1672-1682.
9. Congalton, R.G., Green, K., 1999. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
10. Damera-Venkata, N., Thomas, D.K., Wilson, S.G., Brian, L.E., Bovik, A.C., 2000. Image quality assessment based on a degradation model. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9 (4), 635-636.
11. Du, Q., Younan, N.H., King, R., Shah, V.P., 2007. On the performance evaluation of pan-sharpening techniques. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 4 (4), 518-522.
12. Ehler, M., Klonus, S., Astrand, P.J., Rosso, P., 2010. Multi-sensor for pansharpening in remote sensing. Int. J. Image Data Fusion 1 (1), 25-45.
13. Foody, G.M., Mathur, A., 2005. A relative evaluation of multiclass image classification by Support Vector Machines. IEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 42 (6), 1335-1343.
14. Gonzalez, M., Saleta, J.S., Catalan, R.G., Garcia, R., 2004. Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images using improved IHS and PCA mergers based on wavelet decomposition. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 42 (6), 1291-1299.
15. Jensen, J.R., 2005. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Prospective. Series in Geographic Information Science, 3rd ed. Prentice-Hall, pp. 163-164.
16. Karathanassi, V., Kolokousis, P., Ionnidou, S., 2007. A comparison study on fusion methods using evaluation indicators. Int. J. Remote Sens. 28 (10), 2309-2341.
17. Kavzoglu, T., Colkesen, I., 2009. A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinform. 11, 352-359.
18. King, R.L., Wang, J., 2001. A wavelet based algorithm for pan sharpening landsat 7 imagery. In: Geosci. and Remote Sens. Symp., 2001, IGARSS'01. IEEE 2001 Int., vol. 2, pp. 849-851.
19. Knorn, J., Rabe, A., Radeloff, V.C., Kuemmerle, T., Kozak, J., Hostert, P., 2009. Land cover mapping of large areas using chain classification of neighboring Landsat satellite images. Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 957-964.
20. Kravchenko, V., Perez-Meana, H., Ponomaryov, V., 2009. Adaptive Digital Processing of Multidimensional Signals with Applications. FizMatLit Edit, Moscow, ISBN: 978-5-9221-110-6. Available from: http://www.posgrados.esimecu.ipn.mx.
21. Kumar, U., Mukhopadhyay, C., Ramachandra, T.V., 2009. Pixel based fusion using IKONOS imagery. Int. J. Recent Trend Eng. 1 (1), 173-175.
22. Kumar, U., Dasgupta, A., Mukhopadhyay, C., Joshi, N.V., Ramachandra, T.V., 2011.
23. Comparison of 10 multi-sensor image fusion paradigms for IKONOS images. Int. J. Res. Rev. Comput. Sci. (IJRRCS) 2 (1).
24. Laben, C.A., Brower, B.V., 2000. Process for Enhancing the Spatial Resolution of Multispectral Imagery using Pan-sharpening. United States Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY. US Patent 6,011,875. http://www.freepatentsonline. com/6011875.html.
25. Li, Z., Jing, Z., Yang, X., Sun, S., 2005. Color transfer based remote sensing image fusion using non-separable wavelet frame transform. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 26 (13), 2006-2014.
26. Li, S., Li, Z., Gong, J., 2010. Multivariate statistical of measures for assessing the quality of image fusion. Int. J. Image Data Fusion 1, 47-66.
27. Ling, Y., Ehler, M., Usery, E.L., Madden, M., 2007. FFT-enhanced IHS transform method for fusing high-resolution satellite images. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 61 (2007), 381-392.
28. Liu, Z., Forsyth, D.S., Laganiere, R., 2008. A feature-based metric for the quantitative evaluation of pixel-level image fusion. Comput. Vis. Image Understand. 109, 56-68.
29. Milos, K., Branislav, B., Bosko, G., 2010. Soil type classification and estimation of soil properties using support vector machines. Int. J. Geoderma 154, 340-347.
30. Moser, G., Serpico, S.B., 2009. Unsupervised change detection from multichannel SAR data by Markovian data fusion. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 47 (7), 2114-2128.
31. Nencini, F., Garzeli, A., Baronti, S., Alparone, L., 2007. Remote sensing image fusion using the curvelet transform. Inform. Fusion 8, 143-156.
32. Oommen, T., Misra, D., Twarakavi, N.K.C., Prakash, A., Sahoo, B., Bandopadhyay, S., 2008. An objective analysis of support vector machine based classification for remote sensing. Math. Geosci. 40, 409-424.
33. Otuke, J.R., Blaschke, T., 2010. Land cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and maximum likelihood classification algorithms. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinform. 12, S27-S31.
34. Petropoulos, G.P., Knorr, W., Scholze, M., Boschetti, L., Karantounias, G., 2010.
35. Combining ASTER multispectral imagery analysis and support vector machines for rapid and cost-effective post-fire assessment: a case study from the Greek wildland fires of 2007. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 10, 305-317.
36. Petrovic, V., 2007. Subjective test for image fusion evaluation and objective metric validation. Inform. Fusion 8, 208-216.
37. Pohl, C., Van Genderen, J.L., 1998. Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods, and applications. Int. J. Remote Sens. 19 (5), 823-854.
38. Schowengerdt, R.A., 1998. Reconstruction of multispatial, multispectral image data using spatial frequency content. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 46 (10), 1325-1334.
39. Shah, V.P., Younan, N.H., King, R.L., 2008. An efficient pansharpening method via a combined adaptive PCA approach and contourlets. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 4.
40. Shi, W., Zhu, C., Tian, Y., Nichol, J., 2005. Wavelet-based image fusion and quality assessment. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinform. 6, 241-251.
41. Siddiqui, Y., 2003. The modified IHS methods for using satellite imagery. In: Proc. American Soc. Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Anchorage, Alaska.
42. Taric, A., Dikbas, S., Altunbasak, Y., 2009. A histogram modification framework and its application for image contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 18 (9), 1921-1935.
43. Tsagaris, V., Anastassopoulus, V., 2005. Multispectral image fusion for improved RGB based on perceptual attributes. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26 (15), 3241-3254.
44. Tu, T.-M., Su, S.-C., Shyu, H.-C., Huang, P.S., 2001. A new look at HIS-like image fusion methods. Inform. Fusion 2, 177-186.
45. Van der Linden, S., Janz, A., Waske, B., Eiden, M., Hostert, P., 2007. Classifying segmented hyperspectral data from a heterogeneous urban environment using support vector machines. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 1, 013543.
46. Vijayaraj, V., Younan, N., O'Hara, C., 2006. Concepts of image fusion in remote sensing application. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 10 (6), 3781-3784.
47. Vrabel, J., Doraiswamy, P., McMurtrey, J., Stern, A., 2002. Demonstration of the accuracy of improved resolution hyperspectral imagery. SPIE Symp. Proc. 4725, 556-567.
48. Wald, L., Ranchin, T., Mangolini, M., 1997. Fusion of satellite images of different spatial resolutions: assessing the quality of resulting images. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 63 (6), 691-699.
49. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., 2002. A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Process Lett. 9 (3), 81-84.
50. Wang, Z., Ziou, D., Armenakis, C., Li, D., Li, Q., 2005. A comparative analysis of image fusion methods. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 43 (6), 1391-1402.
51. Xue, H.Q., 2005. Study on data fusion and classification of Landsat 7 ETM + imagery. J. Remote Sens. 9 (2), 186-194.
52. Zhang, Y., 2002. Problems in the fusion of commercial high-resolution satellite images as well as Landsat 7 images and initial solutions. In: International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (IAPRS), GeoSpatial Theory, Processing and Applications, vol. 34, Part 4.