Lessons from the english national programme for IT about structure, process and utility

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 174, Issue , 2012, Pages 17-22

  Swindells, Matthew ^a,b   De Lusignan, Simon ^b  

^a Global Consulting   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health care quality access and evaluation; Medical informatics; Medical records systems computerized; Patient care management

Indexed keywords

AUTHENTICATION; DATA TRANSFER; HEALTH CARE; QUALITY CONTROL;

BACK OFFICE SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC PATIENT RECORD; ELECTRONIC TRANSFERS; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; INFORMATION SHARING; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS; PATIENT CARE;

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE;

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REGISTER; UNITED KINGDOM;

COMMUNICATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; REGISTRIES; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 84864502731     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-052-9-17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. J. Aarts, R. Koppel, Implementation of computerized physician order entry in seven countries, Health Aff (Millwood) 28, 2 (2009), 404-14.
2. B. Chaudhry, J. Wang, S. Wu, et al., Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care, Ann Intern Med 144, 10 (2006):742-52.
3. L.P. Casalino, A. Elster, A. Eisenberg, et al., Will pay-for-performance and quality reporting affect health care disparities? Health Aff (Millwood) 26, 3 (2007):w405-14 (May-Jun).
4. W.L. Holzemer, C.A. Reilly, Variables, variability, and variations research: implications for medical informatics, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2, 3 (1995),183-90.
5. K. Kawamoto, C.A. Houlihan, E.A. Balas, D.F. Loabach, Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review, BMJ 330, 7494 (2005), 765.
6. S. deLusignan, C. van Weel, The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges, FamPract 23, 2 (2006), 253-63.
7. A.D. Black, J. Car, C. Pagliari, et al., The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview, PLoS Med 8 ,1 (2011), e1000387.
8. S. Brennan, The NHS IT Project. The biggest computer programme in the world. Ever!, Radcliffe, Oxford, 2005
9. National Audit Office, Department of Health, The National Programme for IT in the NHS: an update on the delivery of detailed care records systems, Norwich, TSO (The Stationery Office), 2011.
10. R. Pawson, N. Tilley, Evidence-based Policy, a Realist Perspective, Sage, London, 2006.
11. A. Donabedian, Evaluating the quality of medical care, Milbank Mem Fund Q 44, 3 (1966), 166-206.
12. S. de Lusignan, The barriers to clinical coding in general practice: a literature review, Med Inform Internet Med 30, 2 (2005), 89-97 (Jun).
13. A. Vaziri, et al., Are we setting about improving the safety of computerised prescribing in the right way? A workshop report, Inform Prim Care 17, 3 (2009), 175-182.
14. S. Debar, P. Kumarapeli, J.C. Kaski, S. de Lusignan, Addressing modifiable risk factors for coronary heart disease in primary care: an evidence-base lost in translation, FamPract 27, 4 (2010), 370-8.
15. S. de Lusignan, F. Sullivan, Integration, interoperability or linkage: which elements of national IT strategy best support primary care, In: A. Reichert, et al. (Edrs.) Integrating Biomedical Information: From eCell to ePatient, 79-84, IOS Press and Akad. Verlagsgesellschaft Aka GmbH, Berlin 2006.
16. Department of Health, Health Informatics review, http://www.dh.gov.uk/ prod-consum-dh/groups/dh-digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh-086127. pdf (Accessed 19/12/2011)
17. S. de Lusignan, P. Krause, The Hayes principles: learning from the national pilot of information technology and core generalisable theory in informatics. Inform Prim Care 18, 2 (2010):737.
18. P. Krause, S. de Lusignan, Procuring interoperability at the expense of usability: a case study of UK National Programme for IT assurance process, In: B. Blobel, et al. (Edrs.) Seamless Care - Safe Care: The Challenges of Interoperability and Patient Safety in Health Care, 143-149, Series Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 155, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2010.
19. K. Kawamoto, et al., Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success, BMJ 330, 7494 (2005):765.
20. R. Hillestad, J. Bigelow, A. Bower, et al., Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs, Health Aff (Millwood) 24, 5 (2005):1103-17.