Addressing modifiable risk factors for coronary heart disease in primary care: An evidence-base lost in translation

Family Practice

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 370-378

  Debar, Safia ^a   Kumarapeli, Pushpa ^b   Kaski, Juan Carlos ^a   de Lusignan, Simon ^a  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computerized; Guidelines; Heart disease; Medical record systems; Preventive health practice; Public health practice; Quality of health care; Risk; Vascular disease

Indexed keywords

HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSIGN; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY MASS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CASE REPORT; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ETHRISK TOOL; FEMALE; FRAMINGHAM RISK SCORE; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MALE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QRISK TOOL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMOKING;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; COMORBIDITY; CONSENSUS; CORONARY DISEASE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; GREAT BRITAIN; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SOFTWARE;

EID: 77955236966     PISSN: 02632136     EISSN: 14602229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmq025     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. European Heart Network. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2008. http://www.ehnheart.org/files/statistics%202008 %20web-161229A.pdf (accessed on 14 April 2010).
2. British Heart Foundation publications. G30 Coronary Heart Disease Statistics for the UK 2008. http://www.bhf.org.uk/publications/ view_publication.aspx?ps=1001141. (accessed on 14April 2010).
3. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 2004; 364: 937-52.
4. de Lusignan S, Chan T. The development of primary care information technology in the United Kingdom. J Ambul Care Manage 2008; 31: 201-10.
5. Department of Health. National Service Frameworks. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/NationalServiceFrameworks/index.htm (accessed on 14 April 2010).
6. Campbell S, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E et al. Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 181-90.
7. Darzi A. High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. Norwich, UK: The Stationary Office (TSO), 2008.
8. de Lusignan S, Belsey J, Hague N, Dhoul N, van Vlymen J. Auditbased education to reduce suboptimal management of cholesterol in primary care: a before and after study. J Public Health (Oxf) 2006; 28: 361-9.
9. Belsey J, de Lusignan S, Chan T, van Vlymen J, Hague N. Abnormal lipids in high-risk patients achieving cholesterol targets: a cross-sectional study of routinely collected UK general practice data. Curr Med Res Opin 2008; 24: 2551-60.
10. Davies M, Khunti K, Chauhan U et al. The handbook for vascular risk assessment, risk reduction and risk management. A report prepared for the UK National Screening Committee by the University of Leicester. Leicester UK:University of Leiciester, 2008.
11. St George's University of London Cardiovascular Research Group. Managing Global Cardiovascular Disease in General Practice. http://www.cardiosymposia.com (accessed on 14 April 2010).
12. QSR Nvivo version 2.0.163. Manufacturer QSR International. http://www.qsrinternational.com (accessed on 14 April 2010).
13. Fitch K, Bernstein S, Aguilar M et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2001. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1269/ (accessed on 14 April 2010).
14. Kannel WB, McGee D, Gordon T. A general cardiovascular risk profile: the Framingham Study. Am J Cardiol 1976; 38: 46-51.
15. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Vinogradova Y, May M, Brindel P. Derivation and validation of QRISK, a new cardiovascular disease risk score for the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study. BMJ 2007; 335: 136-41.
16. National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care. Cardiovascular Risk Assessment: the Modification of Blood Lipids for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease-Full Guideline DRAFT. 2007. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11628/35630/35630.pdf (accessed on 14 April 2010).
17. British Cardiac Society; British Hypertension Society;DiabetesUK; HEART UK; Primary Care Cardiovascular Society; Stroke Association. JBS 2: Joint British Societies' guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice. Heart 2005; 91 (suppl 5): v1-52 http://heart.bmj.com/content/91/suppl_5/v1.long (accessed on 14 April 2010).
18. Woodward M, Brindle P, Tunstall-Pedoe H. Adding social deprivation and family history to cardiovascular risk assessment: the ASSIGN score from the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort (SHHEC). Heart 2007; 93: 172-6. http://www.assignscore.com/ (accessed on 14 April 2010).
19. SIGN guideline 97. Risk Estimation and the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign97.pdf (accessed on 14 April 2010).
20. Jackson R. Updated New Zealand cardiovascular disease risk-benefit prediction guide. BMJ 2000; 320: 709-10.
21. Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald AP et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 987-1003.
22. Ramsay LE, Haq IU, Jackson PR, Yeo WW. The Sheffield table for primary prevention of coronary heart disease: corrected. Lancet 1996; 348: 1251.
23. Brindle P, May M, Gill P et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a webbased risk score for seven British black and minority ethnic groups. Heart 2006; 92: 1595-602.
24. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Vinogradova Y et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2. BMJ 2008; 336: 1475-82.
25. Ornstein S, Nietert PJ, Jenkins RG et al. Improving the translation of research into primary care practice: results of a national quality improvement demonstration project. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008; 34: 379-90.
26. Feifer C, Ornstein SM, Jenkins RG et al. The logic behind a multimethod intervention to improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines in a nationwide network of primary care practices. Eval Health Prof 2006; 29: 65-88.
27. Jackson R, Marshall R, Kerr A, Riddell T, Wells S. QRISK or Framingham for predicting cardiovascular risk? BMJ 2009; 339: b2673. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2673.
28. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Woodward M, Watt G. ASSIGN, QRISK, and validation. BMJ 2009; 339: b3514. doi: 10.1136/ bmj.b3514.